Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion TextIOWrapper callable encoding parameter
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Rurpy  
View profile  
 More options Jun 11 2012, 11:06 am
From: Rurpy <ru...@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 11 2012 11:06 am
Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] TextIOWrapper callable encoding parameter
As a followup, here are some timing data that seem to confirm
a modest increase in speed as a result of implementing the
callable encoding parameter I proposed (although that would
not be the main reason for wanting to do it.)  These are just
for illustration.  (Among many other reasons, _pyio benchmarks
are not very useful.)

I read four short test files using four methods for determining
the test file's encoding.  The test files are a simplified model
of a python coding declaration (always on first line in our case
with no BOM present [*1]) followed by mixed english and japanese
text.

Method 0 (reopen0):
Use the encoding callable I am proposing.

   def reopen0 (fname):
        def hook (data,buf):
            return get_encoding (data)
        t = io.open (fname, encoding=hook)

Method 1 (reopen1):
Open in binary to determine encoding, then rewrap in a
TextIOWrapper with the correct encoding.

    def reopen1 (fname):
        b = io.open (fname, 'rb')
        line = b.readline()
        enc = get_encoding (line)
        b.seek (0)
        t = io.TextIOWrapper (b, enc, line_buffering=True)
        t.mode = 'r'

Method 2 (reopen2):
Open in binary to determine encoding, then reopen in text mode
with correct encoding.

    def reopen2 (fname):
        b = io.open (fname, 'rb')
        line = b.readline()
        enc = get_encoding (line)
        t = io.open (fname, encoding=enc)

Method 3 (reopen3):
Open in text mode (latin1) to determine encoding, then reopen
in text mode with correct encoding.

    def reopen3 (fname):
        f = io.open (fname, encoding='latin1')
        line = f.readline()
        enc = get_encoding (line)
        t = io.open (fname, encoding=enc)

The same get_encoding() function is used in all methods [*1].

The input test data are all small files (because we want
to measure encoding detection, not how fast read() runs.)
Each has a python/emacs coding declaration in the first line.

test.utf8 -- Tiny python program with coding declaration
  and single print statement in main() function that prints
  a short word (literal) in Japanese.  Encoding is utf-8
  (122 bytes).
test.sjis -- Identical to test.utf8 but sjis encoding
  (111 bytes).
test2.utf8 -- A python coding declaration followed by
  approximately 50 long lines with mixed English and
 Japanese (4274 bytes).
test2.sjis -- Identical to test2.utf8 but sjis encoding
 (3401 bytes).

Results:
---------------------------------------------------------
$ python3 bm.py test.utf8
test.utf8 / reopen0: total time (10000 reps) was 1.188323
test.utf8 / reopen1: total time (10000 reps) was 1.490757
test.utf8 / reopen2: total time (10000 reps) was 1.766081
test.utf8 / reopen3: total time (10000 reps) was 2.141996
$ python3 bm.py test.sjis
test.sjis / reopen0: total time (10000 reps) was 1.175914
test.sjis / reopen1: total time (10000 reps) was 1.471780
test.sjis / reopen2: total time (10000 reps) was 1.764444
test.sjis / reopen3: total time (10000 reps) was 2.122550
$ python3 bm.py test2.utf8
test2.utf8 / reopen0: total time (10000 reps) was 1.690255
test2.utf8 / reopen1: total time (10000 reps) was 1.996235
test2.utf8 / reopen2: total time (10000 reps) was 2.278798
test2.utf8 / reopen3: total time (10000 reps) was 2.727867
$ python3 bm.py test2.sjis
test2.sjis / reopen0: total time (10000 reps) was 1.841388
test2.sjis / reopen1: total time (10000 reps) was 2.147142
test2.sjis / reopen2: total time (10000 reps) was 2.426701
test2.sjis / reopen3: total time (10000 reps) was 2.873278
----------------------------------------------------------

Here is what happen when a test data file is piped
into a program using the four methods above:

  $ cat test.utf8 | python3 stdin.py reopen0
  read 102 characters

  $ cat test.utf8 | python3 stdin.py reopen1
  got exception: [Errno 29] Illegal seek

  $ cat test.utf8 | python3 stdin.py reopen2
  read 0 characters

  $ cat test.utf8 | python3 stdin.py reopen3
  read 0 characters

----
[*1] Here is the get_encoding function used above.  It is
a toy simplified python source encoding line reader.  Toy,
in that is looks at only one line, doesn't consider a BOM,
etc.  It purpose was to allow me to sanity check the benefits
of having a callable encoding parameter.

    def get_encoding (line):
        if isinstance (line, bytes):
            nlpos = line.index(b'\n')
            mo = ENC_PATTERN_B.search (line, 0, nlpos)
            if not mo: return None
            enc = mo.group(1).decode ('latin1')
        else:
            nlpos = line.index('\n')
            mo = ENC_PATTERN_S.search (line, 0, nlpos)
            if not mo: return None
            enc = mo.group(1)
        return enc

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-id...@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.