Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion POFiles and Py3k
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven  
View profile  
 More options Apr 6 2011, 1:35 am
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmo...@in-nomine.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 07:35:06 +0200
Local: Wed, Apr 6 2011 1:35 am
Subject: Re: POFiles and Py3k
-On [20110405 22:26], Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net) wrote:

>On a bit of a tangent: I have had several problems with Babel breaking
>PO-files during processing, either due to bugs in wrapping or escaping.
>polib (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/polib) gave me much better results
>and appears to see significant uptake, so I am wondering if Babel should
>start using polib instead of having its own po/mo implementation.

The problem lies in the fact that you get yet another dependency for Babel.
On the other hand, holding onto Not Invented Here (NIH) is also not
productive.

Need to think some more on this.

--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Atone me to my throes curtail...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.