Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
-On [20110405 22:26], Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net) wrote:
>On a bit of a tangent: I have had several problems with Babel breakingThe problem lies in the fact that you get yet another dependency for Babel.
>PO-files during processing, either due to bugs in wrapping or escaping.
>polib (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/polib) gave me much better results
>and appears to see significant uptake, so I am wondering if Babel should
>start using polib instead of having its own po/mo implementation.
On the other hand, holding onto Not Invented Here (NIH) is also not
Need to think some more on this.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.