Received: by 10.231.188.75 with SMTP id cz11mr158354ibb.0.1302068237922;
        Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: python-babel@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.32.138 with SMTP id c10ls687685ibd.2.p; Tue, 05 Apr 2011
 22:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.69.12 with SMTP id ya12mr78820icb.99.1302068237409;
        Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.69.12 with SMTP id ya12mr78819icb.99.1302068237400;
        Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <pjen...@underboss.org>
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vw9si28086icb.4.2011.04.05.22.37.16
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.210.182 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of pjen...@underboss.org) client-ip=209.85.210.182;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.210.182 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of pjen...@underboss.org) smtp.mail=pjen...@underboss.org
Received: by mail-iy0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 12so1457294iyj.41
        for <python-babel@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.57.144 with SMTP id wg16mr914179icb.162.1302068235269;
        Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <pjen...@underboss.org>
Received: from [192.168.1.117] (astound-66-234-203-92.ca.astound.net [66.234.203.92])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hc41sm173989ibb.30.2011.04.05.22.37.14
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082.1)
Subject: Re: POFiles and Py3k
From: Philip Jenvey <pjen...@underboss.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110406053506.GH90340@nexus.in-nomine.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:37:12 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B2562C43-8FD9-41D1-AB52-353245926...@underboss.org>
References: <4D8B5C56.6010...@gmail.com> <4D8E3D1F.8090...@oss.schwarz.eu> <4D8EAB9A.4090...@gmail.com> <4D8EF95F.7080...@oss.schwarz.eu> <4D948C7F.40...@gmail.com> <4D94EBAA.3060...@oss.schwarz.eu> <4D9B41FD.1080...@gmail.com> <4D9B7AD7.4020...@wiggy.net> <20110406053506.GH90...@nexus.in-nomine.org>
To: python-babel@googlegroups.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082.1)


On Apr 5, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:

> -On [20110405 22:26], Wichert Akkerman (wich...@wiggy.net) wrote:
>> On a bit of a tangent: I have had several problems with Babel breaking 
>> PO-files during processing, either due to bugs in wrapping or escaping. 
>> polib (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/polib) gave me much better results 
>> and appears to see significant uptake, so I am wondering if Babel should 
>> start using polib instead of having its own po/mo implementation.
> 
> The problem lies in the fact that you get yet another dependency for Babel.
> On the other hand, holding onto Not Invented Here (NIH) is also not
> productive.
> 
> Need to think some more on this.

Does it support Python 3?

--
Philip Jenvey