On 22 Sep 2012 17:50, "Yaroslav Halchenko" <yarikop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> > patsy is missing as a dependency/requirementI would really rather not :-). If you're willing to package it then I would
> since it is a new requirement ;-)
> > Yaroslav, Timmie
> from a quick look -- Nathaniel seems have done a good job keeping patsy
be very grateful. (It should be pretty trivial, it's a completely bog
standard setup.py-using pure-python package.)
> > Nathaniel, SkipperMy goal at this point is to keep the API compatible. At the least I'll
> > How stable is the API of patsy?
being up any incompatible changes for discussion first.
> and should there may be a fresh release, especially if statsmodelsI don't think there's anything in git that statsmodels would need? I
> requires some of the recent changes?
haven't had time to touch it much since getting 0.1 out anyway...
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.