On Jun 14, 11:59 am, oliver <
oliver.schoenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This was discussed not long ago in another thread on this list and it was a
> simple matter of adding the extra setup attribute for package. I haven't
> looked at how the use of autopubusbv1 changes this, but the solution of
> implicitely importing setupv1 should take care of any gotchas (if there are
> any -- there is no reason there would be).
>
> Note that the error message indicates that you are in fact NOT using the
> version 1 API. The setupv1 (automatically imported for you if autopubsubv1
> is found) is *exacty* the old API (in fact, it's even the same module file
> put inside the package, with some special import handling for now).
>
> I'll try to look more closely later, if you any of you make any progress
> please post.
> Oliver
>
So I'm using the new API and didn't even know it? I'm pretty sure I