Received: by 10.180.107.101 with SMTP id hb5mr1564161wib.0.1326749391121;
        Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:29:51 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.20.238 with SMTP id q14ls1446307wie.2.gmail; Mon, 16 Jan
 2012 13:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.52.2 with SMTP id d2mr526528wec.4.1326749383975;
        Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.52.2 with SMTP id d2mr526527wec.4.1326749383957;
        Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <ch...@simplistix.co.uk>
Received: from server1.simplistix.co.uk (server1.simplistix.co.uk. [89.151.125.140])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id dq1si3411360wib.1.2012.01.16.13.29.43;
        Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of ch...@simplistix.co.uk designates 89.151.125.140 as permitted sender) client-ip=89.151.125.140;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of ch...@simplistix.co.uk designates 89.151.125.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ch...@simplistix.co.uk
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (cust162-dsl93-89-128.idnet.net [93.89.128.162])
	by server1.simplistix.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8059C4F8045;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:29:43 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4F1496CB.8020306@simplistix.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:29:47 +0000
From: Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
CC: Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com>
Subject: Re: pyramid and zope.component registry
References: <1326739597.3687.29.camel@ellg> <1326740332.24569.11.camel@thinko>
In-Reply-To: <1326740332.24569.11.camel@thinko>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 16/01/2012 18:58, Chris McDonough wrote:
> PS: we just moved the Components code from zope.component.registry to
> zope.interface.registry.  So it's the same code, just with a different
> name.  So it's exactly the same thing, except much cooler, because it
> has a new name. ;-)

For dinosaurs like myself, is there a migration guide anywhere?

(ie: I'm using to calling getSiteManager().registerUtility(), etc, what 
do I do now? Can I still use zope.component's getSiteManager() or will 
things "just not work" (tm))

cheers,

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk