The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: kiorky <kio...@cryptelium.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:27:48 +0200
Local: Thurs, Apr 12 2012 10:27 am
Subject: Re: What about a pyramid collective ?
Le 12/04/2012 15:58, Michael Merickel a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Domen Kožar<do...@dev.si> wrote: For me it is now about managing rights, it is just to avoid packages >> Having something like djangopackages.com + pypi classifier would achieve the >> same goal. Pull requests are also easy to make, I would propose rather to >> have a good read about preferred way of contributing to package maintainers. > I'm much more +1 on maintaining and improving > http://pyramid.opencomparison.org/ (djangopackages). I've also > requested on catalog-sig a "Framework :: Pyramid" trove classifier. I > think in the era of DVCS it doesn't make much sense to attempt to > manage organizations and commit access rights. deletion. In any case everyone get commit rights, so there are no real managment, just a deletion barrier. the djangopackages and the collective just complete themselves. Its like http://plone.org/products and the collective, they complete > You and your But not then really that simple to contribute. It is a 'less' open way > maintainers own the project repo, other people can submit pull > requests. What is more important is that the source repositories are > easy to find, in my opinion. > for which I think the opencomparison page does a good Yes, the links must be replicated to as many places we can. > job. I think the opencomparison page needs much more visibility within > the community. Cordialement, kiorky You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||