Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Looking for something similar to Oesjkit
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
tonthon  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26, 11:06 am
From: tonthon <tontho...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:06:36 +0100
Local: Sat, Jan 26 2013 11:06 am
Subject: Looking for something similar to Oesjkit
Hi,

I'm looking for some feedback on javascript testing tools.
I'd like to test basic dom manipulation and integrate it as much as
possible with py.test.
Oesjkit looks to what I need, but it doesn't seem very active.

Any advice ?

Regards
Gaston


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jonathan Vanasco  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26, 2:12 pm
From: Jonathan Vanasco <jonat...@findmeon.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Jan 26 2013 2:12 pm
Subject: Re: Looking for something similar to Oesjkit

You should be able to do that with selenium, which has python
bindings.

On Jan 26, 11:06 am, tonthon <tontho...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rafael Reuber  
View profile  
 More options Feb 6, 2:21 pm
From: Rafael Reuber <rafaelreu...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 6 2013 2:21 pm
Subject: Re: Looking for something similar to Oesjkit

Qunit  <http://qunitjs.com/>it's a very easy-to-use and powerful javascript
unit test framework.

Em sábado, 26 de janeiro de 2013 16h12min08s UTC-3, Jonathan Vanasco
escreveu:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andi Balke  
View profile  
 More options Feb 6, 3:55 pm
From: Andi Balke <andi.ba...@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:55:39 +0100
Local: Wed, Feb 6 2013 3:55 pm
Subject: Re: Looking for something similar to Oesjkit
hi gaston,

we tried ``ghost.py`` for a longer time since it integrates very well in integration tests and it seemed to be slim. unfortunately it was really flaky and we needed to spend *a lot* in fixing time (tests where running on some machines, on some not). i tried nodeunit for two hours, seems nice, but not a browser tool (actually this was the reason i tried it to be fast). but its not in your stack and somehow it was a bit difficult to setup everything dom-interactive.

in the end we use selenium and we are happy with that. it seems like a heavy solution, but its not compared to the effort for other tools. additionally these kind of tests should be used rarely anyway.

what i like about selenium:
- you can develop and debug tests in your favourite browser (setting a breakpoint will not cause any timeouts)
- you'll get it to run everywhere, also on your headless ci-server
- it is predictable and stable
- it integrates also very good into python/pyramid stack
- there are many resources around, even the java explanations are helpful since the api is similar

what i don't like about selenium:
- we still have some situations where the ci-server fails even though the local tests run. after some time you know where to wait actively; but in the end its somehow logic and predictable.

i cannot tell you about ``py.test``, but starting a selenium-test should be possible from anywhere.

hope this helps,

andi

On 26.01.2013, at 17:06, tonthon wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »