The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Bruce Smith <ores...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:42:39 -0700
Local: Sun, Oct 30 2011 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: How about a 1.2 release?
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:25 AM, greenmoss <ktygoo...@yoderhome.com> wrote: My $0.000002 on that would be that if tests show it clearly works better on > Is there any chance the ctypes-only clone will be integrated before a > pyglet 1.2 release, or for that matter "any time soon"? FWIW, I tried > the clone, and it was acting a bit "weird" for me. at least one configuration we want to support, we should seriously consider integrating it. I have not looked inside it, but it seems like we could add an option to use it, and the messiness would show up either as a lot of tests for that option, or a lot of duplicated code (if the modules that otherwise would have all those tests would have two variants instead). Further, we might not be able to have a perfect automated choice for how to set the option. But either of those situations seems better to me than just not working well on some important system configuration. But until more test results are in, it's hard to discuss this concretely. Also it might be helpful if you would elaborate a bit on "acting a bit - Bruce Smith You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||