pure-sockets 0.3 and clang

[Ryan Schmidt]

The pure-sockets 0.3 README says:

> This package uses Pure's new bitcode loader to ease porting, so you'll need
> Pure 0.45 or later and an LLVM-based C compiler installed. The Makefile is set
> up for clang (http://clang.llvm.org/) by default, because it's easier to
> install, but you can also use llvm-gcc if you set the CC make variable
> accordingly.

But the Makefile has no mention of clang or llvm-gcc.

pure-sockets 0.2's Makefile did use clang, and had commented-out options for llvm-gcc.

Did the clang / llvm-gcc requirement go away with version 0.3? It seems to compile fine for me with Mac OS X's usual gcc 4.2. Does the README need an update?

[Albert Graef]

On 04/29/2011 02:05 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> The pure-sockets 0.3 README says:
>
>> This package uses Pure's new bitcode loader to ease porting, so you'll need
>> Pure 0.45 or later and an LLVM-based C compiler installed. The Makefile is set
>> up for clang (http://clang.llvm.org/) by default, because it's easier to
>> install, but you can also use llvm-gcc if you set the CC make variable
>> accordingly.
>
> But the Makefile has no mention of clang or llvm-gcc.

Oops, it looks like an old README slipped into that tarball. I fixed
that now. Get the latest one from:

http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/files/pure-sockets-0.3.tar.gz

(Same sources as before, only the README has been updated.)

> Did the clang / llvm-gcc requirement go away with version 0.3?

Yes, the module is now built as a shared library like the others. clang
or llvm-gcc isn't required any more.

Albert

--
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email: Dr.G...@t-online.de, a...@muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de
WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag

[Albert Graef]

On 04/30/2011 12:33 PM, Albert Graef wrote:
> Oops, it looks like an old README slipped into that tarball. I fixed
> that now. Get the latest one from:
>
> http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/files/pure-sockets-0.3.tar.gz

Some glitches in the Makefile have been fixed as well, per
http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/issues/detail?id=57.

[Albert Graef]

On 04/30/2011 01:07 PM, Albert Graef wrote:
> On 04/30/2011 12:33 PM, Albert Graef wrote:
>> Oops, it looks like an old README slipped into that tarball. I fixed
>> that now. Get the latest one from:
>>
>> http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/files/pure-sockets-0.3.tar.gz
>
> Some glitches in the Makefile have been fixed as well, per
> http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/issues/detail?id=57.

It seems that GC doesn't let me update the tarball once again, so I just
bumped the version number and uploaded a new one:

http://pure-lang.googlecode.com/files/pure-sockets-0.4.tar.gz