pure-rational license: GPL 2 or 3?

[Ryan Schmidt]

I'm confused about the pure-rational license. The COPYING file, and the documentation on the web site...

http://docs.pure-lang.googlecode.com/hg/pure-rational.html

...say it's under the GPL version 3 or later, but the actual source files have a header saying it's under the GPL version 2 or later.

[Albert Graef]

I think that it should be GPLv2+, since that's what the original Q
sources were distributed under.

Jiri, do you agree?

Albert

--
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email: Dr.G...@t-online.de, a...@muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de
WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag

[jspitz]

On 30 dub, 12:07, Albert Graef <Dr.Gr...@t-online.de> wrote:
> On 04/29/2011 02:24 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> > I'm confused about the pure-rational license. The COPYING file, and the documentation on the web site...
>
> >http://docs.pure-lang.googlecode.com/hg/pure-rational.html
>
> > ...say it's under the GPL version 3 or later, but the actual source files have a header saying it's under the GPL version 2 or later.
>
> I think that it should be GPLv2+, since that's what the original Q
> sources were distributed under.
>
> Jiri, do you agree?

Yes, I do. I will correct it when I return from my holiday.

Jiri