Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion using inetd/xinetd with puppetrun?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Duncan Hill  
View profile  
 More options Jun 26 2008, 5:06 am
From: "Duncan Hill" <bajand...@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:06:30 +0100
Local: Thurs, Jun 26 2008 5:06 am
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: using inetd/xinetd with puppetrun?
2008/6/25 Peter Meier <peter.me...@immerda.ch>:

> Hi

>>> We're not running it on any virtual hosts and are seeing large memory
>>> footprints as well.  Also seeing really large footprints for the
>>> puppetmaster (though I don't care as much about that).

>> puppetmaster still leaks like a sieve for us.  :/  We have to restart it
>> nightly to keep the system from running out of memory, and even that
> I have the same problem on centos 5 boxes, x86_64 as well i386, all
> running in xenguests and 0.24.4 (as well the guests). I deploy a cron on
> puppetmasters to restart puppetmaster every 4 hours. Just to be on the

Puppetmaster 1 - catalog server.
VIRT 99.6, RES 82.

Puppetmaster 2 - file server.
VIRT 52M, RES 37M

I've also got a restart cron job, but it only smacks the catalog
server, not the file server.  CentOS 5, x86, VMware Server guest.

Before I split the file server out (and I sent a patch to dlutter for
the RHEL init script, perhaps it belongs elsewhere), I'd routinely see
puppetmasterd at 200+ MB of memory on a VM that had 256.  Add in the
backup software taking VIRT 139/RES 4.5, and a postgres instance for
storeconfigs, and I'd also be 200 MB into swap, and compile times
would hit hundreds of seconds.  Even with the cron to restart it, this
happened.

So perhaps splitting the file server out has benefits beyond file
serving hogging CPU on the catalog generation?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google