Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion puppet verion 2.7 or 3?

Received: by 10.236.134.232 with SMTP id s68mr3069460yhi.31.1353068016348;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 04:13:36 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.98.103 with SMTP id eh7ls889041qeb.24.gmail; Fri, 16 Nov
 2012 04:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.72.40 with SMTP id a8mr871247qev.13.1353068009671;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 04:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 04:13:28 -0800 (PST)
From: vioilly <oliverle...@gmail.com>
To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <659189f1-eae6-4839-8527-7250a49ed3b8@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOXx1vFfwWVE9-oVPQPnWc9XxB_86zO=gYE=6F1Gg3Lk5F8Qmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f1456537-f703-4dbe-870f-a739f87de6fc@googlegroups.com>
 <CAOXx1vFfwWVE9-oVPQPnWc9XxB_86zO=gYE=6F1Gg3Lk5F8Qmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] puppet verion 2.7 or 3?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_159_15923950.1353068009045"

------=_Part_159_15923950.1353068009045
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_160_3687333.1353068009045"

------=_Part_160_3687333.1353068009045
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

That's a another reason for me to go toward 3.0.1. I assume it is a stable 
release?

On Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:28:03 PM UTC, Jeff McCune wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:45 AM, vioilly <olive...@gmail.com <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > I am just rolling out a new puppet deployment. Which version should i go 
> > for, 2.7 or 3.1? I am looking to use the open source version. 
>
> Puppet 3.0 has a lot of performance improvements and some new 
> functionality compared to Puppet 2.7.  For a new deployment I 
> definitely recommend trying Puppet 3.0.  It's fairly easy to install 
> using the packages we publish at yum.puppetlabs.com and 
> apt.puppetlabs.com.  Information is available at: 
> http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/puppetlabs_package_repositories.html 
>
> The other thing to keep in mind is that Puppet uses semantic version 
> numbers.  There are some incompatibilities between Puppet 2.7 and 3.0. 
>  We will make every effort to preserve compatibility across the entire 
> 3.x series, so starting with 3.0 should give you a really long 
> "compatibility horizon" so to speak. 
>
> Hope this helps, 
> -Jeff 
>

------=_Part_160_3687333.1353068009045
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

That's a another reason for me to go toward 3.0.1. I assume it is a stable release?<br><br>On Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:28:03 PM UTC, Jeff McCune wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:45 AM, vioilly &lt;<a href="javascript:" target="_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto="UuV29MERpooJ">olive...@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:
<br>&gt; Hi,
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; I am just rolling out a new puppet deployment. Which version should i go
<br>&gt; for, 2.7 or 3.1? I am looking to use the open source version.
<br>
<br>Puppet 3.0 has a lot of performance improvements and some new
<br>functionality compared to Puppet 2.7. &nbsp;For a new deployment I
<br>definitely recommend trying Puppet 3.0. &nbsp;It's fairly easy to install
<br>using the packages we publish at <a href="http://yum.puppetlabs.com" target="_blank">yum.puppetlabs.com</a> and
<br><a href="http://apt.puppetlabs.com" target="_blank">apt.puppetlabs.com</a>. &nbsp;Information is available at:
<br><a href="http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/puppetlabs_package_repositories.html" target="_blank">http://docs.puppetlabs.com/<wbr>guides/puppetlabs_package_<wbr>repositories.html</a>
<br>
<br>The other thing to keep in mind is that Puppet uses semantic version
<br>numbers. &nbsp;There are some incompatibilities between Puppet 2.7 and 3.0.
<br>&nbsp;We will make every effort to preserve compatibility across the entire
<br>3.x series, so starting with 3.0 should give you a really long
<br>"compatibility horizon" so to speak.
<br>
<br>Hope this helps,
<br>-Jeff
<br></blockquote>
------=_Part_160_3687333.1353068009045--

------=_Part_159_15923950.1353068009045--