On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Joe Topjian <joe.topj...@cybera.ca> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>> virtual resources are definitely intended to solve the same problem, but
>> they would not work for this use case b/c multiple declarations of the same
>> virtual resource still result in the duplicate definition failures.
>> virtual resources can also be problematic b/c collecting resources also
>> realizes them as a side effect.
> I see. Thank you.
> I incorporated the ensure_resource function into the vhost type:
> It seems to pass the test manifest that I threw at it, but it is giving
> these warnings:
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/functions/create_resources.rb:1: warning:
> multiple values for a block parameter (2 for 1)
> from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/scope.rb:464
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/functions/create_resources.rb:1: warning:
> multiple values for a block parameter (2 for 1)
> from
> /etc/puppet/modules/ensure_resource/lib/puppet/parser/functions/ensure_reso urce.rb:24
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/functions/create_resources.rb:1: warning:
> multiple values for a block parameter (2 for 1)
> from
> /etc/puppet/modules/ensure_resource/lib/puppet/parser/functions/ensure_reso urce.rb:24
should be fixed in master.
> Thanks,
> Joe
> --
> Joe Topjian
> Systems Administrator
> Cybera Inc.
> Cybera is a not-for-profit organization that works to spur and support
> innovation, for the economic benefit of Alberta, through the use
> of cyberinfrastructure.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
