puppet maintainer list/packages for 0.25.0-rc1

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Nigel Kersten

unread,
Aug 4, 2009, 10:26:45 AM8/4/09
to puppe...@googlegroups.com
So I was thinking that if all of us maintainers come up with packages
for puppet 0.25.0-rc1, that would hugely increase the number of users
testing it....

which led me to think that we might need a puppet-maintainers list? I
mean we can co-ordinate on the puppet-dev list if people prefer, but I
can see some benefits in having a targeted list.

It would be great if we could get everything in order so that we
always have release candidate packages available. Our .0 releases
should be much better then...

--
Nigel Kersten
nig...@google.com
System Administrator
Google, Inc.

Steven Jenkins

unread,
Aug 4, 2009, 10:34:47 AM8/4/09
to puppe...@googlegroups.com
Nigel Kersten wrote:
> So I was thinking that if all of us maintainers come up with packages
> for puppet 0.25.0-rc1, that would hugely increase the number of users
> testing it....
>
> which led me to think that we might need a puppet-maintainers list? I
> mean we can co-ordinate on the puppet-dev list if people prefer, but I
> can see some benefits in having a targeted list.
>
> It would be great if we could get everything in order so that we
> always have release candidate packages available. Our .0 releases
> should be much better then...
>

Another project I'm involved with has a -release mailing list where the
packagers and regular testers can collaborate more easily. It facilitates
things like identifying the show-stopper bugs for a particular release, making
sure basic smoke testing is done, making sure all packages are ready, etc.

A -dev list can be used for that, though. I don't have a strong preference
either way.

Steven

Todd Zullinger

unread,
Aug 4, 2009, 10:57:21 AM8/4/09
to puppe...@googlegroups.com
Nigel Kersten wrote:
> So I was thinking that if all of us maintainers come up with
> packages for puppet 0.25.0-rc1, that would hugely increase the
> number of users testing it....
>
> which led me to think that we might need a puppet-maintainers list?
> I mean we can co-ordinate on the puppet-dev list if people prefer,
> but I can see some benefits in having a targeted list.
>
> It would be great if we could get everything in order so that we
> always have release candidate packages available. Our .0 releases
> should be much better then...

Feel free to subscribe me for any list created for this purpose, if we
end up wanting/needing one. I don't have any strong opinion on
whether we need a separate list or if puppet-dev is suitable. I think
I lean slightly to keeping things here, but then, I've generally had
enough time to follow this list. I realize many maintainer might not.
Perhaps just adding a [MAINTAINERS] tag to the subject of package
related mail would suffice to let busier maintainers keep up?

(I'm working on 0.25.0rc1 packages for Fedora/RHEL/CentOS today. I'll
post a reply to the announce mail when I get those finished and posted
to my repo.)

--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The things most people want to know are usually none of their
business.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages