Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Can we do better than a mailing list?

Received: by 10.224.27.14 with SMTP id g14mr2873616qac.1.1347029213034;
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: pumping-station-one-public@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.210.4 with SMTP id gi4ls890684qab.2.gmail; Fri, 07 Sep
 2012 07:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.223.84 with SMTP id ij20mr2869479qab.5.1347029212389;
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.18.193 with SMTP id x1msqaa;
        Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.253.5 with SMTP id zw5mr2189918vec.2.1347028956201;
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.253.5 with SMTP id zw5mr2189917vec.2.1347028956193;
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <rb...@panix.com>
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com. [166.84.1.89])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s13si1149253vde.2.2012.09.07.07.42.35;
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rb...@panix.com designates 166.84.1.89 as permitted sender) client-ip=166.84.1.89;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rb...@panix.com designates 166.84.1.89 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rb...@panix.com
Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1])
	by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C0F2EFAA;
	Fri,  7 Sep 2012 10:42:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by panix1.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20005)
	id ACEF214B8D; Fri,  7 Sep 2012 10:42:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:42:35 -0400
From: Ron Bean <makersp...@rbean.users.panix.com>
To: pumping-station-one-public@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PS1-Public] Can we do better than a mailing list?
Message-ID: <20120907144235.GA7232@panix.com>
Reply-To: Ron Bean <makersp...@rbean.users.panix.com>
References: <504957E6.2080105@rhavenindustrys.com>
 <CANttP85R=VL-P7aKY2k_aYuJoM0Msc3OyjujXNyZGnet38oRFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+mo40=1cb8m4O-boY6ahjgXK0opuaS0=CL2XKfLLdGHXeP5vg@mail.gmail.com>
 <504967F0.1040...@rhavenindustrys.com>
 <CABS3eOij6nqDHPdZR2F_SGJO4yzZWM3nyEC5PQ+9ieLpRrZ...@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABS3eOij6nqDHPdZR2F_SGJO4yzZWM3nyEC5PQ+9ieLpRrZ...@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

>I'm not convinced that a message board would be any less opaque to someone
>who doesn't handle mailing lists well.  Is it the technology or the volume
>that causes the trouble?

Googlegroups can be viewed as a message board or a mailing list.
Am I missing something here?