AEC Involved in Questionable Suspect Behaviour, Says Jamie McIntyre
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Jamie McIntyre
Feb 25, 2014, 12:01:56 PM2/25/14
to publish-the...@googlegroups.com
*****************************************************************
Message delivered directly to members of the group:
publish-the...@googlegroups.com
*****************************************************************
Please consider this free-reprint article written by:
Jamie McIntyre
*****************************
IMPORTANT - Publication/Reprint Terms
- You have permission to publish this article electronically in free-only publications such as a website or an ezine as long as the bylines are included.
- You are not allowed to use this article for commercial purposes. The article should only be reprinted in a publicly accessible website and not in a members-only commercial site.
- You are not allowed to post/reprint this article in any sites/publications that contains or supports hate, violence, porn and warez or any indecent and illegal sites/publications.
- You are not allowed to use this article in UCE (Unsolicited Commercial Email) or SPAM. This article MUST be distributed in an opt-in email list only.
- If you distribute this article in an ezine or newsletter, we ask that you send a copy of the newsletter or ezine that contains the article to http://www.isnare.com/eta.php?aid=1884709
- If you post this article in a website/forum/blog, ALL links MUST be set to hyperlinks and we ask that you send a copy of the URL where the article is posted to http://www.isnare.com/eta.php?aid=1884709
- We request that you ask permission from the author if you want to publish this article in print.
The role of iSnare.com is only to distribute this article as part of its Article Distribution feature ( http://www.isnare.com/distribution.php ). iSnare.com does NOT own this article, please respect the author's copyright and this publication/reprint terms. If you do not agree to any of these terms, please do not reprint or publish this article.
*****************************
Article Title: AEC Involved in Questionable Suspect Behaviour, Says Jamie McIntyre
Author: Jamie McIntyre
Word Count: 1115
Article URL: http://www.isnare.com/?aid=1884709&ca=Politics
Format: 64cpl
Contact The Author: http://www.isnare.com/eta.php?aid=1884709
Easy Publish Tool: http://www.isnare.com/html.php?aid=1884709
*********************** ARTICLE START ***********************
21st Century Australia Party Founder Jamie McIntyre says: ‘if people think that the AEC is just incompetent and not involved in more questionable suspect behaviour, then they are naïve’.
Ex candidate for the seat of New England, Jamie McIntyre was the first to allege wrongdoing by the AEC even before Clive Palmer took a stand against their suspect and incompetent practices.
McIntyre says that the AEC needs to be replaced and a new body that is both competent and eliminates questionable tactics should be founded to run elections for the 21st Century.
HERE IS A RECENT STATEMENT RELEASED BY JAMIE MCINTYRE REGARDING AEC’S ALLEGED INTERFERENCE:
The fact that we don’t vote online in the age of the Internet is a joke. AEC claiming that online voting isn’t safe is nonsense as the current system is designed to maximise vote rigging.
Why else are there only pencils and not pens to vote? Why are there no ID checks to vote? Why are names deliberately added to electoral roles of people who don’t exist? Many voters are unable to be found on the list despite being registered voters and the fact that anyone can vote as many times as they like at different booths on Election Day is signs of a system designed to enable election rigging if and when needed.
Much of this is gross incompetence, but that is not the biggest issue at hand as not all of it can be explained as simple bureaucratic bungling.
When I was running for the Federal Electorate of New England against Barnaby Joyce and Tony Windsor (until he quit), I was shocked at the number of legitimate and credible allegations raised against the AEC regarding how vote rigging occurs.
This shouldn’t have surprised me, especially after studying the 1993 election, which many claim was clearly rigged by the Labor Party and was perhaps one of the most disgraceful episodes in our political history.
Yet where are the investigative journalists that have the courage to call a suspect system open to corruption when they see it?
I made serious complaints against the AEC about how they deliberately prevented 21st Century Australia Party from being able to run in the elections- despite having 900 registered members even though only 500 were required.
Yet conveniently many of these registered voters couldn’t be found.
Moreover, we had done everything necessary and on time, however, they still used every dirty, questionable, dodgy and incompetent trick in the book to ensure that the application had to be resubmitted several times in order to stretch it out for three long months.
All they had to do was simply cross check 500 names off a list (3 hours work at the most for a junior staff member) but they deliberately delayed it to the very exact day they required to ensure that the party couldn’t run on the original election date by exactly one day.
Despite having 900 members they would only allow 550 to be submitted at any given time. Therefore all they would need to do to reject an application continually is find 51 members that are not on the electoral role and considering the fact that the AEC database is at least 25% inaccurate, this is almost a mathematical certainty.
If a party was allowed to submit say 600 or 700 names or even 900 names, the 500 could be found within hours and a party would be approved on time.
But as the AEC have not accidental, but deliberate systems in place to ensure that an up and coming political party that has the potential to steal hundreds of thousands of voters from the two major parties and steal their valuable electoral funding, they delay and prevent a party from being on the ballot paper
What’s even worse is that they lie to the media and public stating that it is the party’s bungling and not their deliberate interference.
The naive journalists who buy the sory that was leaked by the AEC accusing my party of having failed to get its paper work in order are a joke. Anyone with any level of above average intelligence can investigate what the AEC has done and see that it is not only gross incompetence but also questionable suspect behaviour.
Suspect questionable tactics to ensure democracy was interfered with and a rapidly growing new political party that had way more grass root support than even the Palmer United Party was stopped from running in the election and hundreds of thousand of voters couldn’t vote for their preferred political party.
Moreover, I was forced to run as an Independent, which in New England is the most toxic brand one can imagine, especially after Windsor and Okashott trashed it.
At least in Zimbabwe they wait to cheat the opposing parties at the polls.
However in Australia that’s clearly plan B, as it is simply easier to stop them from being able to run at all.
And what do we get from the two media company system (just like the two party system we have)?
Not a squeak.
Not a single investigation.
Not a single ‘Maybe we better check out these allegations against the AEC’.
All they did was create smear campaigns to stop any momentum from new parties and new political leaders who threaten the status quo.
Why as a party leader do I have to tolerate digital and print media stories that are planted and deliberately presented with false information?
Is someone threatening to break up the cosy two party monopoly we have in Australia disguised as democracy, which is a big of a threat to their system?
Let’s face it; in Australia we have one major media company in bed with the Coalition and the other in bed with the Labor and Greens.
My prediction is that Australians won’t see real political choice until we see real media choice.
And that is why I said that it will take a new party like 21st Century Australia at least ten years to make a significant impact because the mainstream media in Australia will be controlled by the two dominant political players for almost another decade before their powers start to wane.
The question is do Australians want to wait a decade for real change, real choices and real policies?
*********************** ARTICLE END ***********************
- To distribute your articles go to http://www.isnare.com/distribution.php
- For more free-reprint articles go to http://www.isnare.com
Message delivered directly to members of the group:
publish-the...@googlegroups.com
*****************************************************************
Please consider this free-reprint article written by:
Jamie McIntyre
*****************************
IMPORTANT - Publication/Reprint Terms
- You have permission to publish this article electronically in free-only publications such as a website or an ezine as long as the bylines are included.
- You are not allowed to use this article for commercial purposes. The article should only be reprinted in a publicly accessible website and not in a members-only commercial site.
- You are not allowed to post/reprint this article in any sites/publications that contains or supports hate, violence, porn and warez or any indecent and illegal sites/publications.
- You are not allowed to use this article in UCE (Unsolicited Commercial Email) or SPAM. This article MUST be distributed in an opt-in email list only.
- If you distribute this article in an ezine or newsletter, we ask that you send a copy of the newsletter or ezine that contains the article to http://www.isnare.com/eta.php?aid=1884709
- If you post this article in a website/forum/blog, ALL links MUST be set to hyperlinks and we ask that you send a copy of the URL where the article is posted to http://www.isnare.com/eta.php?aid=1884709
- We request that you ask permission from the author if you want to publish this article in print.
The role of iSnare.com is only to distribute this article as part of its Article Distribution feature ( http://www.isnare.com/distribution.php ). iSnare.com does NOT own this article, please respect the author's copyright and this publication/reprint terms. If you do not agree to any of these terms, please do not reprint or publish this article.
*****************************
Article Title: AEC Involved in Questionable Suspect Behaviour, Says Jamie McIntyre
Author: Jamie McIntyre
Word Count: 1115
Article URL: http://www.isnare.com/?aid=1884709&ca=Politics
Format: 64cpl
Contact The Author: http://www.isnare.com/eta.php?aid=1884709
Easy Publish Tool: http://www.isnare.com/html.php?aid=1884709
*********************** ARTICLE START ***********************
21st Century Australia Party Founder Jamie McIntyre says: ‘if people think that the AEC is just incompetent and not involved in more questionable suspect behaviour, then they are naïve’.
Ex candidate for the seat of New England, Jamie McIntyre was the first to allege wrongdoing by the AEC even before Clive Palmer took a stand against their suspect and incompetent practices.
McIntyre says that the AEC needs to be replaced and a new body that is both competent and eliminates questionable tactics should be founded to run elections for the 21st Century.
HERE IS A RECENT STATEMENT RELEASED BY JAMIE MCINTYRE REGARDING AEC’S ALLEGED INTERFERENCE:
The fact that we don’t vote online in the age of the Internet is a joke. AEC claiming that online voting isn’t safe is nonsense as the current system is designed to maximise vote rigging.
Why else are there only pencils and not pens to vote? Why are there no ID checks to vote? Why are names deliberately added to electoral roles of people who don’t exist? Many voters are unable to be found on the list despite being registered voters and the fact that anyone can vote as many times as they like at different booths on Election Day is signs of a system designed to enable election rigging if and when needed.
Much of this is gross incompetence, but that is not the biggest issue at hand as not all of it can be explained as simple bureaucratic bungling.
When I was running for the Federal Electorate of New England against Barnaby Joyce and Tony Windsor (until he quit), I was shocked at the number of legitimate and credible allegations raised against the AEC regarding how vote rigging occurs.
This shouldn’t have surprised me, especially after studying the 1993 election, which many claim was clearly rigged by the Labor Party and was perhaps one of the most disgraceful episodes in our political history.
Yet where are the investigative journalists that have the courage to call a suspect system open to corruption when they see it?
I made serious complaints against the AEC about how they deliberately prevented 21st Century Australia Party from being able to run in the elections- despite having 900 registered members even though only 500 were required.
Yet conveniently many of these registered voters couldn’t be found.
Moreover, we had done everything necessary and on time, however, they still used every dirty, questionable, dodgy and incompetent trick in the book to ensure that the application had to be resubmitted several times in order to stretch it out for three long months.
All they had to do was simply cross check 500 names off a list (3 hours work at the most for a junior staff member) but they deliberately delayed it to the very exact day they required to ensure that the party couldn’t run on the original election date by exactly one day.
Despite having 900 members they would only allow 550 to be submitted at any given time. Therefore all they would need to do to reject an application continually is find 51 members that are not on the electoral role and considering the fact that the AEC database is at least 25% inaccurate, this is almost a mathematical certainty.
If a party was allowed to submit say 600 or 700 names or even 900 names, the 500 could be found within hours and a party would be approved on time.
But as the AEC have not accidental, but deliberate systems in place to ensure that an up and coming political party that has the potential to steal hundreds of thousands of voters from the two major parties and steal their valuable electoral funding, they delay and prevent a party from being on the ballot paper
What’s even worse is that they lie to the media and public stating that it is the party’s bungling and not their deliberate interference.
The naive journalists who buy the sory that was leaked by the AEC accusing my party of having failed to get its paper work in order are a joke. Anyone with any level of above average intelligence can investigate what the AEC has done and see that it is not only gross incompetence but also questionable suspect behaviour.
Suspect questionable tactics to ensure democracy was interfered with and a rapidly growing new political party that had way more grass root support than even the Palmer United Party was stopped from running in the election and hundreds of thousand of voters couldn’t vote for their preferred political party.
Moreover, I was forced to run as an Independent, which in New England is the most toxic brand one can imagine, especially after Windsor and Okashott trashed it.
At least in Zimbabwe they wait to cheat the opposing parties at the polls.
However in Australia that’s clearly plan B, as it is simply easier to stop them from being able to run at all.
And what do we get from the two media company system (just like the two party system we have)?
Not a squeak.
Not a single investigation.
Not a single ‘Maybe we better check out these allegations against the AEC’.
All they did was create smear campaigns to stop any momentum from new parties and new political leaders who threaten the status quo.
Why as a party leader do I have to tolerate digital and print media stories that are planted and deliberately presented with false information?
Is someone threatening to break up the cosy two party monopoly we have in Australia disguised as democracy, which is a big of a threat to their system?
Let’s face it; in Australia we have one major media company in bed with the Coalition and the other in bed with the Labor and Greens.
My prediction is that Australians won’t see real political choice until we see real media choice.
And that is why I said that it will take a new party like 21st Century Australia at least ten years to make a significant impact because the mainstream media in Australia will be controlled by the two dominant political players for almost another decade before their powers start to wane.
The question is do Australians want to wait a decade for real change, real choices and real policies?
*********************** ARTICLE END ***********************
- To distribute your articles go to http://www.isnare.com/distribution.php
- For more free-reprint articles go to http://www.isnare.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages