Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
H2S Experiment Update
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  9 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Matthew Xi  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 2:36 am
From: Matthew Xi <deepwin...@rhus.winterroot.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:36:05 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 2:36 am
Subject: H2S Experiment Update

Hi all,
I wanted to share an update on the H2S experiment we are getting together here in the SF Bay Area.  First of all, re: location.  There appear to be 2 good possibilities for larger salt marshes, the Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge and the Palo Alto Baylands.  Gwen and I visited Don Edwards a few days ago, in certain areas the smell of sulpher is so intense it's almost sickening, and is just by the road.  At Don Edwards, getting cleared for access beyond 'Marshlands Road' is apparently a hurdle, but at the very least we could probably set up canisters along the road without any problem.

I've also had the good fortune to be in touch with a postdoc at Stanford, who has offered to help out finding a good location and gaining access.  She advises that the Palo Alto Baylands is much easier to get a permit to run a study in, much smaller so easier to manage, and also she'd done a 5 year study in an area there where they do know the sediments (at least) contain H2S.   She also advised that the notion of a 'collapsed' salt marsh isn't one she is familiar with, that instead they mostly all are stinky to some degree.  I'm still a bit new to the biogeochemistry, but either way it seems like this will be a good experiment on an environmental source of H2S.  There's a definitely certain areas that smell much more strongly of sulpher than others, but others would have to speak to the reason until I can read more.

So the pieces are coming together to run the experiment, and if things continue to go well we hope to run it in the next couple of weeks.  I've attached a simple KML with both locations to give an idea of what we are looking at.  Also a couple of photos from Marsh Road in Don Edwards.  More updates to follow..  I'll also post this as a research note.

http://wildbay.iriscouch.com/houseofsaltmarsh/1CCE826F-BA57-4FF0-81B6...
http://wildbay.iriscouch.com/houseofsaltmarsh/E8E18EC4-8F49-4640-93AD...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sara Ann Wylie  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 1:35 pm
From: Sara Ann Wylie <sawy...@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:35:04 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: [PLOTS] H2S Experiment Update
Hi Matt,

This is great, I recommend that you read through the materials we've been
gathering together on safety and H2S:

http://publiclaboratory.org/notes/sara/7-18-2012/safety-precautions-h...

Particularly the pdf on symptoms of exposure and exposure levels.

Sara

Quoting Matthew Xi <deepwin...@rhus.winterroot.net>:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Aerial map of palo alto baylands" by Matthew Xi
Matthew Xi  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 4:55 pm
From: Matthew Xi <deepwin...@rhus.winterroot.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:55:40 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 4:55 pm
Subject: Aerial map of palo alto baylands

So one problem that's come up with the proposal of running our experiment at the Palo Alto Baylands is that if we want to do a balloon or kite map, it apparently has to be cleared with air control - because there are many nearby airports.  Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.  It sounds like even researchers at Stanford have a lot of trouble getting permission to do this at this location.  Ideas?

-m


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gwen  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 4:57 pm
From: gwen <myuncleb...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:57:34 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 4:57 pm
Subject: Re: [PLOTS] Aerial map of palo alto baylands
What is the height were restrictions being coming into play? What about
a kite map instead?

On 7/27/12 1:55 PM, Matthew Xi wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gwen  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 4:58 pm
From: gwen <myuncleb...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:58:18 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 4:58 pm
Subject: Re: [PLOTS] Aerial map of palo alto baylands
helps if I read the whole email I suppose - but my question still
stands, what is the height where restrictions come into play?

On 7/27/12 1:55 PM, Matthew Xi wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Liz Barry  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 5:29 pm
From: Liz Barry <eba...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:29:42 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 5:29 pm
Subject: Re: [PLOTS] Aerial map of palo alto baylands

Check out the balloon mapping regulations wiki page for a play by play of
what you have to do near an airport (or three):

http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/balloon-mapping-regulations

-- near an airport , more restrictions than the usual below 500' and <6'
come into play.
I'm traveling now but feel free to call 336-269-1539
On Jul 27, 2012 4:58 PM, "gwen" <myuncleb...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stewart Long  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 5:42 pm
From: Stewart Long <stewartbl...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:42:54 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 5:42 pm
Subject: Re: [PLOTS] Aerial map of palo alto baylands

We should be able to call our Regional Flight Service Station with the FAA and request a NOTAM with our location, date, and altitude
http://www.aopa.org/flightplanning/articles/2007/071004card.pdf
http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/mapping-curriculum-regulatory-situation
I am optimistic; I think we can fly at low altitude if there is a problem with getting a NOTAM.
--
Stewart


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Shannon Dosemagen  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 5:55 pm
From: Shannon Dosemagen <shannon.dosema...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:55:32 -0500
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 5:55 pm
Subject: Re: [PLOTS] Aerial map of palo alto baylands

Hey Matthew, are you doing this mapping in relation to the H2S test? If so,
Scott and I were thinking when we did the test that flying really low,
maybe 50', would be more appropriate for mapping where we laid the test
canisters out. If this thread isn't in relation to H2S then disregard :)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gwen  
View profile  
 More options Jul 27 2012, 6:15 pm
From: gwen <myuncleb...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:15:15 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 27 2012 6:15 pm
Subject: Re: [PLOTS] Aerial map of palo alto baylands

Hi Shannon-

Yes! This is about the H2S tests we'll be running in Palo Alto.

I think, if we can get permission to fly, we'd really like to get images
from higher up than that.  If everything works out in the experiment
we'll have geolocated ground images (from our Rhus app) of exactly where
each canister was placed in addition to the aerial map!

-Gwen

On 7/27/12 2:55 PM, Shannon Dosemagen wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »