why 2 addresses?
malicks
of one? Do certain client resolver libraries behave differently when
configured with one address vs. a list?
Prem Ramaswami
--
========================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "public-dns-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to public-dn...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
public-dns-disc...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/public-dns-discuss?hl=en
For more information on Google Public DNS, please visit
http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns
========================================================
--
=======================
Prem Ramaswami
Product Manager - Google
http://www.google.co.in/internetbus
=======================
malicks
single Anycast address should still give you network-level redundancy.
On Dec 21, 7:30 pm, Prem Ramaswami <pr...@google.com> wrote:
> it's often best to have a primary and secondary in case of inaccessibility
> to one of the routes.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:31 PM, malicks <mali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am curious why you chose to advertise two Anycast addresses instead
> > of one? Do certain client resolver libraries behave differently when
> > configured with one address vs. a list?
>
> > --
> > ========================================================
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "public-dns-discuss" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to public-dn...@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > public-dns-disc...@googlegroups.com<public-dns-discuss%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
