Is it safe to use Plack::Util::Accessor in frameworks?

[Zbigniew Lukasiak]

Using Plack::Util::Accessor would eliminate one more dependency from
my framework - but the documentation is not clear if this module is
not an internal only Plack util that external code should not rely on.

What I need is assurance that it will play well with MooseX::NonMoose
- i.e. that it will stay hash based.

--
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/

[Tatsuhiko Miyagawa]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak <zzb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using Plack::Util::Accessor would eliminate one more dependency from
> my framework - but the documentation is not clear if this module is
> not an internal only Plack util that external code should not rely on.
>
> What I need is assurance that it will play well with MooseX::NonMoose
> - i.e. that it will stay hash based.

it will most probably, but i can't assure it - if you're worried you
can always use one of those Class::Accessor::* on CPAN that has no
deps.

--
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa