Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Changes under the hood to event handling
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mike Rumble  
View profile  
 More options Jun 23, 5:53 pm
From: Mike Rumble <mike.rum...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 23 2009 5:53 pm
Subject: Changes under the hood to event handling
I was having a poke around under the hood of the latest RC and noticed
some changes to event handling (I think the changes were actually made
for RC1, but none the less).

The event handling system now uses the new Element Storage to cache
handlers, and I'm interested to learn the rationale for this. Was the
change made simply to adopt Element Storage or are there performance
benefits?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tobie Langel  
View profile  
 More options Jun 23, 6:24 pm
From: Tobie Langel <tobie.lan...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 23 2009 6:24 pm
Subject: Re: Changes under the hood to event handling
The former, I believe. I would tend to think that these changes would
actually cause higher memory consumptions on one-paged applications
(handlers of removed DOM nodes cannot be garbage collected).

On Jun 23, 11:53 pm, Mike Rumble <mike.rum...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google