2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Violations! Was There Any Action Taken?
7 views
Skip to first unread message
euclid...@gmail.com
Apr 5, 2009, 8:32:51 AM4/5/09
to Protest
Date : Saturday 04 April 2009
From : Euclid Megara
To: The USA Government,
pres...@whitehouse.gov [president<at>whitehouse.gov]
vice.pr...@whitehouse.gov [vice.president<at>whitehouse.gov]
singapore....@mail.doc.gov
[singapore.office.box<at>mail.doc.gov]
singapore...@state.gov [singaporeusembassy<at>state.gov]
inq...@useic.org [inquiry<at>useic.org]
singapore...@state.gov [singaporefulbright<at>state.gov]
singap...@state.gov [singaporecon<at>state.gov]
singap...@state.gov [singaporeacs<at>state.gov]
democrat...@foreign.senate.gov
[democrat_interns<at>foreign.senate.gov]
USA....@mail.fedinfo.gov [USA.gov1<at>mail.fedinfo.gov]
wsj....@wsj.com [wsj.ltrs<at>wsj.com]
edit.f...@wsj.com [edit.features<at>wsj.com]
let...@feer.com [letters<at>feer.com]
colum....@feer.com [colum.murphy<at>feer.com]
2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Violations!
Was There Any Action Taken?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Government of United States of America,
As referred in the Annex dated November 07,2007 below there were
violations
against the 2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement committed by the
Government of Singapore.
I would like to know if you people had taken the Annex seriously. If
you think
that this is a prank mail then I am sorry for bothering you.
Thank you for reading and best regards.
__________________________
EUCLID MEGARA (Deceased)
Euclid...@gmail.com [EuclidMegara<at>gmail.com]
Annex A:
----------------
http://groups.google.com.sg/group/soc.culture.singapore/msg/b8913c3e2f84243f?dmode=source
Date: Wednesday November 07, 2007
Are Oppression & Suppression Only In Burma? (Wednesday November 7,
2007)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To:
k...@un.org
wynho...@un.org
maki...@un.org
globalcomp...@un.org
wynho...@un.org
enqu...@dfid.gov.uk
postste...@bmz.bund.de
i...@bmwi.bund.de
postste...@auswaertiges-amt.de
postste...@bpra.bund.de
InternetP...@bundesregierung.de
presserefe...@bundestag.de
presid...@whitehouse.gov
vice_presid...@whitehouse.gov
comme...@whitehouse.gov
sg-web-presid...@ec.europa.eu
euro-ombuds...@europarl.eu.int
s_r_nat...@istana.gov.sg
lee_hsien_lo...@pmo.gov.sg
abdullah_tarm...@parl.gov.sg
p...@parl.gov.sg
siewkumh...@gmail.com
hri.ku...@drewnapier.com
charles_ch...@singaporeair.com.sg
yamk...@pacific.net.sg
chia...@singnet.com.sg
l...@wp.org.sg
chan_sek_ke...@supcourt.gov.sg
koh_beng_...@supcourt.gov.sg
leana_...@supcourt.gov.sg
subct_regist...@subct.gov.sg
chao_hick_...@agc.gov.sg
a...@agc.gov.sg
presid...@lawsoc.org.sg
law...@lawsoc.org.sg
direc...@aware.org.sg
n...@newstoday.com.sg
stfo...@sph.com.sg
t...@sph.com.sg
w...@wp.sg
spea...@singaporedemocrat.org
pa...@pap.org.sg
TheOpti...@yahoogroups.com
TheOptical-ow...@yahoogroups.com
report...@channelnewsasia.com
lett...@iht.com
letters.edi...@ft.com
lett...@feer.com
webadmin.h...@unog.ch
jana...@sph.com.sg
and...@sph.com.sg
newsedit...@wsj.com
feedb...@wsj.com
wolfg...@motzarella.org
Are Oppression & Suppression Only In Burma? (Wednesday November 7,
2007)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear United Nations & Western Regimes,
Lately you guys had been busy pressing for human rights in Burma.
Obviously you had been pressing for changes to improve human rights
and quality of life in Burma. Your call to ASEAN, now chaired by
Singapore, to make a more drastic stance on the situation had been met
with only rhetoric. Of course the governments of Singapore and other
ASEAN states had reiterated that the military junta in Burma is
fundamental and cannot be done away with and that any change must
involve the military junta. In addition to that, ASEAN also stresses
that its influences would mean nothing if the giants India and China
won't help out. So Singapore being the chair of ASEAN had put up an
image that it is all for human rights but only could not act to make
changes. Well should the world believe Singapore Government's
rhetoric? Or should it care to know more about what this Singapore
Government does in its own territory before coming to any conclusion?
Many people in ASEAN nations protested against the arrest of
protestors in Burma. Well as far as I know only in Singapore the
government arrested all four protestors who protested outside the
presidential palace. Those four protestors' demands included that the
Singapore Government clarify its relationship with the Burmese
Government that not only produces and exports narcotics to the rest of
the world but also deny freedom of speech and expression to its people
who want self determination via democracy or via representative
elected cameral.
I now tend to think that the Singapore Government is just giving lip
services to the United Nations to appear good in the eyes of the
Europeans with whom ASEAN is now negotiating a Free Trade Agreement or
something of the like. However the Europeans as are concerned of
human rights violations in ASEAN. For example a few months ago some
European Union Parliament Members made a tour of the ASEAN region.
These European MPs had said that they were able to have public forums
with the people in Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines ...etc. However
these Europeans MPs were denied permission by the Singapore Police to
address the Singapore public in an indoor conference. Even the
Deputy Speaker of Singapore Parliament said that she could not
interfere in police decision since it involved possible law and order
problems. Well that is what the Singapore Government had been using
to suppress and oppress rightful and just political dissent. So if
law and order in public are all that important that the Government of
Singapore has no choice but to resort to strict procedures, laws and
rules in a densely populated city and country, then what law and order
problems are there in the internet forum pages that express political
dissatisfaction with the Government of Singapore that the Government
of Singapore had to resort to Draconian measures to deny freedom of
speech and expression?
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I am affected directly by one such
oppressive suppression. I am sorry that I have to waste your time to
elaborate this.
In Singapore many companies are owned and operated by the government
directly or indirectly. One such company is Singapore
Telecommunications(Singtel) which is more than half owned by Temasek
Holdings which is one of the investment companies of the Ministry of
Finance of Singapore. Lee Hsien Loong the Prime Minister of Singapore
is also the Finance Minister, and his second wife is the Chief
Executive Officer of Temasek Holdings that controls Singapore
Telecommunications.
Singnet, a member of the Singapore Telecommunications Group, offers
subscribers access to Internet. I am personally accessing Internet
via a Singet Internet subscription plan. As an Internet Service
Provider (ISP) Singtel is obligated or at least should be obligated to
provide the services it is collecting fees for. Internet provides
access to many world wide web (WWW) portals like Google, Yahoo, MSN,
AOL ...etc.
Certain world-wide-web portals like Google also provide users access
to read from and post to Newsgroups (also known as USENET).
Newsgroups are electronic forums pages. Example of a Newsgroup via
Google :
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.singapore/browse_frm/thread/44f65126f89918bb/
I am also a user of these Newsgroups. I read from and post to these
Newsgroups for quite sometime by now. Many criticise my postings and
I too criticise many postings of others. I must admit that America
and Europe had done a fantastic job of exporting and making available
freedom of speech and expression to the international community via
the Internet and Newsgroups and I thank you for that.
Even before Google, Newsgroups till the present time are made
available by Newsgroup servers(computers). Messages are read from and
posted to these Newsgroup servers via the use of News Network Transfer
Protocol (NNTP) that is transmittable via the Internet.
NNPT is just an electronic envelope (or electronic frame) that carries
messages and is sent and received through the Internet to post to and
read from Newsgroup servers. There are many Newsgroup servers
worldwide.
Newsgroup Servers would reject these NNTP or electronic envelopes and
the message they carry if these NNTP envelopes did not carry certain
necessary basic information like:
Name (That Poster wish to be displayed in post) :
Organisation (Optional) :
Email Address (The Email Address of poster) :
Reply Email Address (Optional) :
NewsServer Name :
News Port (NNTP) :
NewsServer Account Name :
NewsServer Account Password :
The basic information that I used were as follows:
Name (That Poster wish to be displayed in post) : LKYs Mother
Organisation (Optional) :
Email Address (The Email Address of poster) : LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com
Reply Email Address (Optional) :
NewsServer Name : news.motzarella.net
News Port (NNTP) : 119 (commonly 119 for non-encrypted
communications)
NewsServer Account Name : fernandez1
NewsServer Account Password : **********
So anyone who wants to post to or read from Newsgroups forums using
NNTP must have read or post access to a Newsgroup Server. This
access is granted by the issuing of usernames and passwords by the
Newsgroup servers. Usually there is no need for username and password
to read from Newsgroups Servers but most of the time to post to
Newsgroups Servers username and password are needed.
I find it convenient to use NNTP and had been using it to read from
and post to Newsgroups servers. However lately I could not post to the
Newsgroup Server news.motzarella.net. I suspect that I had been
technically restricted in using NNTP by the Government of Singapore or
by agents or other elements that work directly or indirectly for the
Government of Singapore. From hereon this suspected hackers shall be
referred to as the Singapore Government Hackers. So the Singapore
Government Hackers are selectively denying my NNTP outgoing electronic
traffic.
One might ask how sure am I that it is the Singapore Government
Hackers that are the ones restricting my worldwide Newsgroup access?
Again I have to elaborate here and sorry for the lengthy explanation.
As I had said earlier to access Newsgroups one needs to create unique
username and password. To create a username and password in Newsgroup
news.motzarella.net one needs a valid email address. Usually
transactions in the Internet would most of the time require a valid
email address. So I created the email addresses :
LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com
GODs_Mot...@hotmail.com
Please note that Yahoo and Hotmail(microsoft) are American companies.
With the above addresses I applied for unique usernames and passwords
from the Newsgroup Server : news.motzarella.org (this server is
based in Germany)
Two user names, fernandez1 & fernandez2 with passwords, were created
in the Motzarella Newsgroup Server and I used them to post to the
German Newsgroup server.
Most of the time users would need a software to read and post to
Newsgroup Servers. I use freely downloadable Microsoft Outlook
Express and Netscape Mail & Newsgroup Software to communicate with the
Motzarella Newsgroup Server.
Live was happy till I got a warning on 28 October 2007 from a poster
who went by the poster name "kingsnake". This person warned that a
police report had been made against my usage of the email address:
LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com for NNTP posting purposes. According to this
person the letters 'LKY' could be used only to reference "Lee Kuan
Yew" the founding father of Singapore and any other use would be
defamation and that I am liable to be sued. Please refer to the
Google achieve for the postings :
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.singapore/tree/browse_frm/thread/44f65126f89918bb/ce3e0ebd63f686eb?rnum=1&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fsoc.culture.singapore%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F44f65126f89918bb%2F%3F#doc_e7eba05bdf820191
Of course I did not agree and countered that the term "LKY" could mean
many things to different people and it all depends on the
perspective. However within a few days I encountered the following
problems :
a) I could not post to the German Newsgroup Server news.motzarella.net
using as Source Email Address: LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com and Poster Name:
LKY's Mother. I was denied posting rights and error message given was
that my account was in some ban list.
b) So I Switched to using another Motzarella Server Address :
news1.motzarella.org and posted till I was denied posting rights and
error message given was that my account was in some ban list.
c) Now after changing the Source Email Address to something else but
retaining the same Poster Name I was able to post for sometime till
again the restriction was applied again. Again the error message said
that my account was in the banned list.
d) Next I changed both the Source Email Address and the Poster Name to
something else and I able to post till restrictions applied again.
Again the error message said that my account was in the banned list.
It looked like the Singapore Government Hackers were intercepting my
outgoing NNPT packets (or electronic envelops) and cancelling them if
they contained Poster Names and Email Addresses that they did not like
and they did not like I using the term "LKYs_Mother". They could only
do this kind of diagnostics and interceptive operations with Forensic
Technology and Know How given to them by the American and European
counterparts who had invented and sold them. So I hold the American
and the European Governments directly or indirectly responsible for
supporting and proliferating attacks on politically dissenting speech
and expression in Singapore.
e) Meanwhile I Switched to using another Motzarella Server Address :
news2.motzarella.org but found that the server no longer recognized my
usernames and passwords. Surprisingly my Motzarella usernames and
passwords had been cancelled. Motzarella' web page has a service that
could be triggered to send username and password information to users'
email addresses. When I used this service it replied that none of my
usernames existed. Now how could that happen if Motzarella
administrators were not doing it? Of course there is always the
possibility of Motzarella administrators cancelling my usernames and
passwords, but they are do busy to do that or politically too liberal
to help the Singapore Government fight what may look like possible
dissent in the Newsgroups. So I still could not pin point on whether
the Singapore Government Hackers or Motzarella administrators who were
had cancelled my Motzarella usernames and passwords.
f) Yet I once again used my Yahoo and Microsoft Hotmail Email
Addresses to create new Motzarella usernames and passwords.
Additionally I also created a Google Email Address (also known gmail)
and also used it to create another Motzarella username and password.
Now I used different Poster Name and Email Address that were different
from the term "LKYs Mother" to post to Newsgroups again successfully.
But still this only lasted less than an hour before the restrictions
came again. Well this time the error message was that the
news.motzarella.org server had denied NNTP posts from my IP Address.
That was very comforting and fascinating.
How could a Newsgroup administrator be so available to just waste time
to only restrict my access to the Newsgroups? In addition to that I
also found that the Motzarella usernames and passwords that I had
created with the use of Yahoo and Microsoft Hotmail Email Addresses
were cancelled once again but surprisingly the Motzarella username and
password created using Google's gmail Email Address was not
cancelled. Though I had used all three Motzarella usernames only two
were cancelled this time. This would be highly inefficient if
Motzorella administrator was the one cancelling the my Motzarella
username and passwords. However it is also highly possible that it
could be the work of Singapore Government Hackers. Apparently the
Singapore Government Hackers had intercepted my NNTP outgoing packets
and had cancelled those packets and had also learned my Motzarella
NewsServer usernames. Then they had used the Motzarella online
password recovery service to send information about my Motzarella
usernames and passwords my Yahoo, Microsoft Hotmail and Google gmail
Email Accounts. It seems that the Singapore Government Hackers are
able to hack into Yahoo and Microsoft Hotmail accounts but not
Google's gmail. I think that is how they possibly got to know my
Motzarella usernames and passwords, and with that they must have
cancelled my usernames and passwords by issuing remote control
commands to the Motzarella Newsgroup Server.
Of course one could still argue that the Motzarella username
cancellations were done by the Motzarella administrator but such a
doubt was recently removed when the Singapore Government Hackers
started doing other things.
Though I posted to the Germany based Motzarella Newsgroup Server most
of the time I did not download Newsgroup messages from it. Instead I
found it much faster to download Newsgroup messages from the Newsgroup
Server freenews.netfront.net . Going by its IP (internet protocol)
address it is based in Hong Kong which is much nearer to me. So I
downloaded hundreds of messages from freenews.netfront.net and replied
via news.motzarella.net . I could not post via freenews.netfront.net
because I do not have posting rights there.
All of a Sudden I found that I not only could not access Motzarella
Newsgroup server but also could not access the Nerfront server. So
what are the possibilities of Motzarella administrators manipulating
and restricting my reading access into a Newsgroup server based in
Hong Kong? Definitely this is the work of the Singapore Government
Hackers.
That is because few days ago I could PING the Motzarella and Netfront
Newsgroup Servers but now I could not. PING is an Internet Control
Message Protocol(ICMP) that could be used to check the connectivity
from the user's computer to any destination or target server or
computer. However at the moment when I PING these Newsgroups my
computer reports that it cannot recognise the addresses. That is only
possible if the Internet Service Provider Singnet is messing with the
Domain Name Servers.
Since I am using Singnet Internet service then naturally my computer
is configured to use (DNS) Domain Name Servers of Singnet :
Domain Name Server (DNS) #1: 165.21.83.88
Domain Name Serfer (DNS) #2: 165.21.100.88
Every computer server in the Internet has a unique numerical address
and with these addresses the computers communicate with each other.
But we humans are not comfortable to remember server addresses when
they are numbers. So we give meaningful memorable names like www.singnet.com.sg
to servers. Domain Name Servers are computers that have a database
that would contain all other server names and their corresponding
numerical addresses. So when I command my computer to communicate
with say news.motzarella.net it would need to have the numerical
address of news.motzarella.net to communicate with it. So to obtain
the numerical address of news.motzarella.net my computer would make
contact with the designated Domain Name Server (DNS) of Singnet. So
since my computer had reported that it could not recognise the server
names that I had provided then it had become obvious to me that I am
under Singapore Government Hackers' attack.
So there was nothing that I could do but take a break to think about
the situation. After a few hours when I tested my computer again I
found that my computer is able to recognise freenews.netfront.net but
not news.motzarella.net . There could be only one simple explanation
for this. Singapore Government Hackers had realised that
freenews.netfront.net is only for downloading and reading purposes and
that there would be no reason to block it and restrict other users as
well. However news.motzarella.net is a posting server that exists
outside Singapore and outside the jurisdiction of the Singapore
courts, and so it is a dangerous tool that could be used for dissent.
So it remains unrecognisable to my computer since the Singnet DNS
refuses to translate the alphabetical name to numerical address or
Internet Protocol.
So based on my experiences and attacks I had concluded that I am under
attack from Singapore Government Hackers.
So why am I writing about my grievances to the American and European
governments? Well recent newspaper reports suggest that the United
Nations, European Union, ASEAN and the United States of America had
been very troubled by the unrest in Burma and had despatched an high
level envoy to Burma to negotiate changes that might lead to a people
elected government. Particularly since Singapore as chair of ASEAN
had been supporting United Nations move to initiate changes in
Burma.
So I am now questioning to the sincerity of Singapore Government, USA
Government, European Government to see Burma embrace political
freedom. Currently the Singapore Government Hackers are violating my
freedom of political speech in the Internet to the extent of
intercepting my electronic transmissions and cancelling them. The
Singapore Government Hackers could only do so with the forensic
technology, knowledge and training provided by Europeans and Americans
who had invented and created such things. So on the one hand I see
the Europeans and American calling for political freedom and an end to
oppression and suppression in Burma and on the other hand they are
aiding Singapore Government Hackers with forensic technology, know how
and trainings to stop politically dissenting comments from people like
me.
As far as I am concerned the Americans and Europeans are hypocrites
for aiding the Singapore Government Hackers. Of course one might
accuse me of all lying about Singapore Government Hackers. But do the
Europeans and Americans dare to check what is happening in the
Singapore Internet World. How would the Americans and Europeans know
on whether their knowledge and technology had been used to suppress
and oppress political freedom in ASEAN? Do they care about it?
The Australians had been correct to make noise a few years ago about
the Singapore Telecommunication group's purchase of a satellite that
was partially being used by the Australian defence force. It seems
that the Singapore Government's survival comes first as far as it is
concerned and the Australians were correct to put their defence
concerns first above their trust of the Singapore Government.
Similarly global governments are right to be concerned about Foreign
Sovereign Funds like Singapore's that may value freedom of speech
lesser than the western world. Under the influences of Foreign
Sovereign Funds political freedom and speech could take a severe
beating.
One might ask on why should my case bother the western regimes?
Microsoft, Yahoo and Google are multi-billion dollars American
technological companies. Motzarella is a German European company. I
am using free email and newsgroups services provided by these
companies. By posting thousands of messages via Motzarella into
newsgroups I had helped to advertise Motzarella in the internet since
my every post carries Motzarella's name. Likewise by including Yahoo,
Microsoft Hotmail and now even Google emails addresses in my messages
I had also helped to advertise these companies. Google had become a
multi-billion dollars company by aggressive and prudent
advertisements. So advertisements could bring in much currency to a
company. When the Singapore Government Hackers prevent me from posting
via Motzarella they are preventing me from adding to the value of
Motzarella, Yahoo, Microsoft Hotmail and Google.
So are not the Singapore Government's actions affecting USA's and
European's cooperate world? The hacking of Yahoo & MSN Hotmail email
accounts is a direct violation of the US-Singapore Free Trade
Agreement. Though Motzarella Newserver is based in Germany the
Singapore Government Hackers decision to remove its name from the
Singtel Domain Name Server also violates access to telecommunication
service between Europe and Singapore. Since ASEAN is negotiating a
Free Trade Agreement with Europe or something of the like then I now
urge the Europeans to give importance to Freedom of speech and
expression as part of the Human Rights requirements that European
Union is very concerned about.
My comments are my analysis of matters and therefore are my personal
intellectual property and I reserve all rights. I choose to post them
in forum pages worldwide. Singapore Government Hackers' work to
censor me had gone against the spirit of freedom of speech and had
even violated Singapore Laws pertaining to computer usage and
electronics transmissions.
I urge the Americans and Europeans to compel the Singapore Government
to respect freedom and speech and restrain itself from harassing
private citizens.
Justice delayed is not only justice denied, and justice denied is not
only justice denied but they are also injustice enforced by in
action. Justice should not only be perceived done but it should also
be done as well. Anything less would only be ingredients to brew civil
wars.
In the recent International Bar Association conference in Singapore
the Singapore Law Minister Professor Jayakumar had reiterated about
the rule of Law for a more stable system. However one cannot easily
forget the retort from a Japanese Judge who serve in the International
Court of Justice that the Rule of Law is only the enforcement and
administration of a process or procedure and justice could only be
done if the substance of the law carries it. He went on to cite
Hitler's German Nuremberg Laws that were used to persecute and kill
Jews. Though the Jews were killed lawfully could one also say that
they were killed justly? That is the perfect example that law is not
justice. Law is just a tool while justice is a principle. A tool
could be used to destroy or create. Therefore more important than Rule
of Law is the substance of justice embedded within those laws. Only
then the government could uphold justice. If no one cares about
justice then why have a judicial system. So what if people are robbed
or murdered? Lets not forget that the laws were created to uphold
justice. To just uphold law without justice is to just feed a dead
human and there would be no meaning to the Rule of Law. To just
believe in the Rule of Law is to just believe in a Tool. We the
people should create, destroy and amend the tools to fit Justice and
the tools should not exist at the expense of Justice.
I hope that the Governments of the Free World would embrace the higher
principle that the laws were created to uphold. Justice that is all
that they need to do and force the Singapore Government to embrace as
well.
For :
".. we could not accept the paradox that the responsibility is the
least
where the power is the greatest. ... "
- said after World War II at the International Military Tribunal
(IMT),
created to try Nazi War Criminals retroactively!
I know that after I had sent out this mail the Government of Singapore
will set out on the paramount mission to search, find, chase, hunt
down and finally kill me. Well I am not afraid and am ready to die.
Or perhaps they might sacrifice me to the GODs that had sent down to
Earth their only begotten son be the only Founding Father of
Singapore.
GOODBYE.
_________________________________________________
LKYs_...@gmail.com LKYs_Mother(at)gmail.com
LKYs_...@yahoo.com LKYs_Mother(at)yahoo.com
LKYs_...@hotmail.com LKYs_Mother(at)hotmail.com
PS:
I am a STAR WARS fan and love the character Master Jedi Yoda. So I
had taken the liberty to bestow the title of LORD KNIGHT upon Master
Jedi Yoda. Therefore Yoda is now known as LORD KNIGHT YODA (LKY).
PS1:
Lately urgently I had learned to configure my computer to access a
Domain Name Server in the United States of America. So now I could
PING the Germany News Server but had not posted to Newsgroups yet. But
I am so sure that the Singapore Government would throw its obligations
under US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement to the winds and ban the
access of the American Domain Name Server Internet Protocols as
well. Once again I take this opportunity to thank the United States
of America and the European Union for providing the Singapore
Government with the Forensic Technology, knowledge and trainings to
find and persecute, prosecute or even torture dissidents. Well done.
Hypocrites !
From : Euclid Megara
To: The USA Government,
pres...@whitehouse.gov [president<at>whitehouse.gov]
vice.pr...@whitehouse.gov [vice.president<at>whitehouse.gov]
singapore....@mail.doc.gov
[singapore.office.box<at>mail.doc.gov]
singapore...@state.gov [singaporeusembassy<at>state.gov]
inq...@useic.org [inquiry<at>useic.org]
singapore...@state.gov [singaporefulbright<at>state.gov]
singap...@state.gov [singaporecon<at>state.gov]
singap...@state.gov [singaporeacs<at>state.gov]
democrat...@foreign.senate.gov
[democrat_interns<at>foreign.senate.gov]
USA....@mail.fedinfo.gov [USA.gov1<at>mail.fedinfo.gov]
wsj....@wsj.com [wsj.ltrs<at>wsj.com]
edit.f...@wsj.com [edit.features<at>wsj.com]
let...@feer.com [letters<at>feer.com]
colum....@feer.com [colum.murphy<at>feer.com]
2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Violations!
Was There Any Action Taken?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Government of United States of America,
As referred in the Annex dated November 07,2007 below there were
violations
against the 2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement committed by the
Government of Singapore.
I would like to know if you people had taken the Annex seriously. If
you think
that this is a prank mail then I am sorry for bothering you.
Thank you for reading and best regards.
__________________________
EUCLID MEGARA (Deceased)
Euclid...@gmail.com [EuclidMegara<at>gmail.com]
Annex A:
----------------
http://groups.google.com.sg/group/soc.culture.singapore/msg/b8913c3e2f84243f?dmode=source
Date: Wednesday November 07, 2007
Are Oppression & Suppression Only In Burma? (Wednesday November 7,
2007)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To:
k...@un.org
wynho...@un.org
maki...@un.org
globalcomp...@un.org
wynho...@un.org
enqu...@dfid.gov.uk
postste...@bmz.bund.de
i...@bmwi.bund.de
postste...@auswaertiges-amt.de
postste...@bpra.bund.de
InternetP...@bundesregierung.de
presserefe...@bundestag.de
presid...@whitehouse.gov
vice_presid...@whitehouse.gov
comme...@whitehouse.gov
sg-web-presid...@ec.europa.eu
euro-ombuds...@europarl.eu.int
s_r_nat...@istana.gov.sg
lee_hsien_lo...@pmo.gov.sg
abdullah_tarm...@parl.gov.sg
p...@parl.gov.sg
siewkumh...@gmail.com
hri.ku...@drewnapier.com
charles_ch...@singaporeair.com.sg
yamk...@pacific.net.sg
chia...@singnet.com.sg
l...@wp.org.sg
chan_sek_ke...@supcourt.gov.sg
koh_beng_...@supcourt.gov.sg
leana_...@supcourt.gov.sg
subct_regist...@subct.gov.sg
chao_hick_...@agc.gov.sg
a...@agc.gov.sg
presid...@lawsoc.org.sg
law...@lawsoc.org.sg
direc...@aware.org.sg
n...@newstoday.com.sg
stfo...@sph.com.sg
t...@sph.com.sg
w...@wp.sg
spea...@singaporedemocrat.org
pa...@pap.org.sg
TheOpti...@yahoogroups.com
TheOptical-ow...@yahoogroups.com
report...@channelnewsasia.com
lett...@iht.com
letters.edi...@ft.com
lett...@feer.com
webadmin.h...@unog.ch
jana...@sph.com.sg
and...@sph.com.sg
newsedit...@wsj.com
feedb...@wsj.com
wolfg...@motzarella.org
Are Oppression & Suppression Only In Burma? (Wednesday November 7,
2007)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear United Nations & Western Regimes,
Lately you guys had been busy pressing for human rights in Burma.
Obviously you had been pressing for changes to improve human rights
and quality of life in Burma. Your call to ASEAN, now chaired by
Singapore, to make a more drastic stance on the situation had been met
with only rhetoric. Of course the governments of Singapore and other
ASEAN states had reiterated that the military junta in Burma is
fundamental and cannot be done away with and that any change must
involve the military junta. In addition to that, ASEAN also stresses
that its influences would mean nothing if the giants India and China
won't help out. So Singapore being the chair of ASEAN had put up an
image that it is all for human rights but only could not act to make
changes. Well should the world believe Singapore Government's
rhetoric? Or should it care to know more about what this Singapore
Government does in its own territory before coming to any conclusion?
Many people in ASEAN nations protested against the arrest of
protestors in Burma. Well as far as I know only in Singapore the
government arrested all four protestors who protested outside the
presidential palace. Those four protestors' demands included that the
Singapore Government clarify its relationship with the Burmese
Government that not only produces and exports narcotics to the rest of
the world but also deny freedom of speech and expression to its people
who want self determination via democracy or via representative
elected cameral.
I now tend to think that the Singapore Government is just giving lip
services to the United Nations to appear good in the eyes of the
Europeans with whom ASEAN is now negotiating a Free Trade Agreement or
something of the like. However the Europeans as are concerned of
human rights violations in ASEAN. For example a few months ago some
European Union Parliament Members made a tour of the ASEAN region.
These European MPs had said that they were able to have public forums
with the people in Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines ...etc. However
these Europeans MPs were denied permission by the Singapore Police to
address the Singapore public in an indoor conference. Even the
Deputy Speaker of Singapore Parliament said that she could not
interfere in police decision since it involved possible law and order
problems. Well that is what the Singapore Government had been using
to suppress and oppress rightful and just political dissent. So if
law and order in public are all that important that the Government of
Singapore has no choice but to resort to strict procedures, laws and
rules in a densely populated city and country, then what law and order
problems are there in the internet forum pages that express political
dissatisfaction with the Government of Singapore that the Government
of Singapore had to resort to Draconian measures to deny freedom of
speech and expression?
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I am affected directly by one such
oppressive suppression. I am sorry that I have to waste your time to
elaborate this.
In Singapore many companies are owned and operated by the government
directly or indirectly. One such company is Singapore
Telecommunications(Singtel) which is more than half owned by Temasek
Holdings which is one of the investment companies of the Ministry of
Finance of Singapore. Lee Hsien Loong the Prime Minister of Singapore
is also the Finance Minister, and his second wife is the Chief
Executive Officer of Temasek Holdings that controls Singapore
Telecommunications.
Singnet, a member of the Singapore Telecommunications Group, offers
subscribers access to Internet. I am personally accessing Internet
via a Singet Internet subscription plan. As an Internet Service
Provider (ISP) Singtel is obligated or at least should be obligated to
provide the services it is collecting fees for. Internet provides
access to many world wide web (WWW) portals like Google, Yahoo, MSN,
AOL ...etc.
Certain world-wide-web portals like Google also provide users access
to read from and post to Newsgroups (also known as USENET).
Newsgroups are electronic forums pages. Example of a Newsgroup via
Google :
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.singapore/browse_frm/thread/44f65126f89918bb/
I am also a user of these Newsgroups. I read from and post to these
Newsgroups for quite sometime by now. Many criticise my postings and
I too criticise many postings of others. I must admit that America
and Europe had done a fantastic job of exporting and making available
freedom of speech and expression to the international community via
the Internet and Newsgroups and I thank you for that.
Even before Google, Newsgroups till the present time are made
available by Newsgroup servers(computers). Messages are read from and
posted to these Newsgroup servers via the use of News Network Transfer
Protocol (NNTP) that is transmittable via the Internet.
NNPT is just an electronic envelope (or electronic frame) that carries
messages and is sent and received through the Internet to post to and
read from Newsgroup servers. There are many Newsgroup servers
worldwide.
Newsgroup Servers would reject these NNTP or electronic envelopes and
the message they carry if these NNTP envelopes did not carry certain
necessary basic information like:
Name (That Poster wish to be displayed in post) :
Organisation (Optional) :
Email Address (The Email Address of poster) :
Reply Email Address (Optional) :
NewsServer Name :
News Port (NNTP) :
NewsServer Account Name :
NewsServer Account Password :
The basic information that I used were as follows:
Name (That Poster wish to be displayed in post) : LKYs Mother
Organisation (Optional) :
Email Address (The Email Address of poster) : LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com
Reply Email Address (Optional) :
NewsServer Name : news.motzarella.net
News Port (NNTP) : 119 (commonly 119 for non-encrypted
communications)
NewsServer Account Name : fernandez1
NewsServer Account Password : **********
So anyone who wants to post to or read from Newsgroups forums using
NNTP must have read or post access to a Newsgroup Server. This
access is granted by the issuing of usernames and passwords by the
Newsgroup servers. Usually there is no need for username and password
to read from Newsgroups Servers but most of the time to post to
Newsgroups Servers username and password are needed.
I find it convenient to use NNTP and had been using it to read from
and post to Newsgroups servers. However lately I could not post to the
Newsgroup Server news.motzarella.net. I suspect that I had been
technically restricted in using NNTP by the Government of Singapore or
by agents or other elements that work directly or indirectly for the
Government of Singapore. From hereon this suspected hackers shall be
referred to as the Singapore Government Hackers. So the Singapore
Government Hackers are selectively denying my NNTP outgoing electronic
traffic.
One might ask how sure am I that it is the Singapore Government
Hackers that are the ones restricting my worldwide Newsgroup access?
Again I have to elaborate here and sorry for the lengthy explanation.
As I had said earlier to access Newsgroups one needs to create unique
username and password. To create a username and password in Newsgroup
news.motzarella.net one needs a valid email address. Usually
transactions in the Internet would most of the time require a valid
email address. So I created the email addresses :
LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com
GODs_Mot...@hotmail.com
Please note that Yahoo and Hotmail(microsoft) are American companies.
With the above addresses I applied for unique usernames and passwords
from the Newsgroup Server : news.motzarella.org (this server is
based in Germany)
Two user names, fernandez1 & fernandez2 with passwords, were created
in the Motzarella Newsgroup Server and I used them to post to the
German Newsgroup server.
Most of the time users would need a software to read and post to
Newsgroup Servers. I use freely downloadable Microsoft Outlook
Express and Netscape Mail & Newsgroup Software to communicate with the
Motzarella Newsgroup Server.
Live was happy till I got a warning on 28 October 2007 from a poster
who went by the poster name "kingsnake". This person warned that a
police report had been made against my usage of the email address:
LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com for NNTP posting purposes. According to this
person the letters 'LKY' could be used only to reference "Lee Kuan
Yew" the founding father of Singapore and any other use would be
defamation and that I am liable to be sued. Please refer to the
Google achieve for the postings :
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.singapore/tree/browse_frm/thread/44f65126f89918bb/ce3e0ebd63f686eb?rnum=1&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fsoc.culture.singapore%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F44f65126f89918bb%2F%3F#doc_e7eba05bdf820191
Of course I did not agree and countered that the term "LKY" could mean
many things to different people and it all depends on the
perspective. However within a few days I encountered the following
problems :
a) I could not post to the German Newsgroup Server news.motzarella.net
using as Source Email Address: LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com and Poster Name:
LKY's Mother. I was denied posting rights and error message given was
that my account was in some ban list.
b) So I Switched to using another Motzarella Server Address :
news1.motzarella.org and posted till I was denied posting rights and
error message given was that my account was in some ban list.
c) Now after changing the Source Email Address to something else but
retaining the same Poster Name I was able to post for sometime till
again the restriction was applied again. Again the error message said
that my account was in the banned list.
d) Next I changed both the Source Email Address and the Poster Name to
something else and I able to post till restrictions applied again.
Again the error message said that my account was in the banned list.
It looked like the Singapore Government Hackers were intercepting my
outgoing NNPT packets (or electronic envelops) and cancelling them if
they contained Poster Names and Email Addresses that they did not like
and they did not like I using the term "LKYs_Mother". They could only
do this kind of diagnostics and interceptive operations with Forensic
Technology and Know How given to them by the American and European
counterparts who had invented and sold them. So I hold the American
and the European Governments directly or indirectly responsible for
supporting and proliferating attacks on politically dissenting speech
and expression in Singapore.
e) Meanwhile I Switched to using another Motzarella Server Address :
news2.motzarella.org but found that the server no longer recognized my
usernames and passwords. Surprisingly my Motzarella usernames and
passwords had been cancelled. Motzarella' web page has a service that
could be triggered to send username and password information to users'
email addresses. When I used this service it replied that none of my
usernames existed. Now how could that happen if Motzarella
administrators were not doing it? Of course there is always the
possibility of Motzarella administrators cancelling my usernames and
passwords, but they are do busy to do that or politically too liberal
to help the Singapore Government fight what may look like possible
dissent in the Newsgroups. So I still could not pin point on whether
the Singapore Government Hackers or Motzarella administrators who were
had cancelled my Motzarella usernames and passwords.
f) Yet I once again used my Yahoo and Microsoft Hotmail Email
Addresses to create new Motzarella usernames and passwords.
Additionally I also created a Google Email Address (also known gmail)
and also used it to create another Motzarella username and password.
Now I used different Poster Name and Email Address that were different
from the term "LKYs Mother" to post to Newsgroups again successfully.
But still this only lasted less than an hour before the restrictions
came again. Well this time the error message was that the
news.motzarella.org server had denied NNTP posts from my IP Address.
That was very comforting and fascinating.
How could a Newsgroup administrator be so available to just waste time
to only restrict my access to the Newsgroups? In addition to that I
also found that the Motzarella usernames and passwords that I had
created with the use of Yahoo and Microsoft Hotmail Email Addresses
were cancelled once again but surprisingly the Motzarella username and
password created using Google's gmail Email Address was not
cancelled. Though I had used all three Motzarella usernames only two
were cancelled this time. This would be highly inefficient if
Motzorella administrator was the one cancelling the my Motzarella
username and passwords. However it is also highly possible that it
could be the work of Singapore Government Hackers. Apparently the
Singapore Government Hackers had intercepted my NNTP outgoing packets
and had cancelled those packets and had also learned my Motzarella
NewsServer usernames. Then they had used the Motzarella online
password recovery service to send information about my Motzarella
usernames and passwords my Yahoo, Microsoft Hotmail and Google gmail
Email Accounts. It seems that the Singapore Government Hackers are
able to hack into Yahoo and Microsoft Hotmail accounts but not
Google's gmail. I think that is how they possibly got to know my
Motzarella usernames and passwords, and with that they must have
cancelled my usernames and passwords by issuing remote control
commands to the Motzarella Newsgroup Server.
Of course one could still argue that the Motzarella username
cancellations were done by the Motzarella administrator but such a
doubt was recently removed when the Singapore Government Hackers
started doing other things.
Though I posted to the Germany based Motzarella Newsgroup Server most
of the time I did not download Newsgroup messages from it. Instead I
found it much faster to download Newsgroup messages from the Newsgroup
Server freenews.netfront.net . Going by its IP (internet protocol)
address it is based in Hong Kong which is much nearer to me. So I
downloaded hundreds of messages from freenews.netfront.net and replied
via news.motzarella.net . I could not post via freenews.netfront.net
because I do not have posting rights there.
All of a Sudden I found that I not only could not access Motzarella
Newsgroup server but also could not access the Nerfront server. So
what are the possibilities of Motzarella administrators manipulating
and restricting my reading access into a Newsgroup server based in
Hong Kong? Definitely this is the work of the Singapore Government
Hackers.
That is because few days ago I could PING the Motzarella and Netfront
Newsgroup Servers but now I could not. PING is an Internet Control
Message Protocol(ICMP) that could be used to check the connectivity
from the user's computer to any destination or target server or
computer. However at the moment when I PING these Newsgroups my
computer reports that it cannot recognise the addresses. That is only
possible if the Internet Service Provider Singnet is messing with the
Domain Name Servers.
Since I am using Singnet Internet service then naturally my computer
is configured to use (DNS) Domain Name Servers of Singnet :
Domain Name Server (DNS) #1: 165.21.83.88
Domain Name Serfer (DNS) #2: 165.21.100.88
Every computer server in the Internet has a unique numerical address
and with these addresses the computers communicate with each other.
But we humans are not comfortable to remember server addresses when
they are numbers. So we give meaningful memorable names like www.singnet.com.sg
to servers. Domain Name Servers are computers that have a database
that would contain all other server names and their corresponding
numerical addresses. So when I command my computer to communicate
with say news.motzarella.net it would need to have the numerical
address of news.motzarella.net to communicate with it. So to obtain
the numerical address of news.motzarella.net my computer would make
contact with the designated Domain Name Server (DNS) of Singnet. So
since my computer had reported that it could not recognise the server
names that I had provided then it had become obvious to me that I am
under Singapore Government Hackers' attack.
So there was nothing that I could do but take a break to think about
the situation. After a few hours when I tested my computer again I
found that my computer is able to recognise freenews.netfront.net but
not news.motzarella.net . There could be only one simple explanation
for this. Singapore Government Hackers had realised that
freenews.netfront.net is only for downloading and reading purposes and
that there would be no reason to block it and restrict other users as
well. However news.motzarella.net is a posting server that exists
outside Singapore and outside the jurisdiction of the Singapore
courts, and so it is a dangerous tool that could be used for dissent.
So it remains unrecognisable to my computer since the Singnet DNS
refuses to translate the alphabetical name to numerical address or
Internet Protocol.
So based on my experiences and attacks I had concluded that I am under
attack from Singapore Government Hackers.
So why am I writing about my grievances to the American and European
governments? Well recent newspaper reports suggest that the United
Nations, European Union, ASEAN and the United States of America had
been very troubled by the unrest in Burma and had despatched an high
level envoy to Burma to negotiate changes that might lead to a people
elected government. Particularly since Singapore as chair of ASEAN
had been supporting United Nations move to initiate changes in
Burma.
So I am now questioning to the sincerity of Singapore Government, USA
Government, European Government to see Burma embrace political
freedom. Currently the Singapore Government Hackers are violating my
freedom of political speech in the Internet to the extent of
intercepting my electronic transmissions and cancelling them. The
Singapore Government Hackers could only do so with the forensic
technology, knowledge and training provided by Europeans and Americans
who had invented and created such things. So on the one hand I see
the Europeans and American calling for political freedom and an end to
oppression and suppression in Burma and on the other hand they are
aiding Singapore Government Hackers with forensic technology, know how
and trainings to stop politically dissenting comments from people like
me.
As far as I am concerned the Americans and Europeans are hypocrites
for aiding the Singapore Government Hackers. Of course one might
accuse me of all lying about Singapore Government Hackers. But do the
Europeans and Americans dare to check what is happening in the
Singapore Internet World. How would the Americans and Europeans know
on whether their knowledge and technology had been used to suppress
and oppress political freedom in ASEAN? Do they care about it?
The Australians had been correct to make noise a few years ago about
the Singapore Telecommunication group's purchase of a satellite that
was partially being used by the Australian defence force. It seems
that the Singapore Government's survival comes first as far as it is
concerned and the Australians were correct to put their defence
concerns first above their trust of the Singapore Government.
Similarly global governments are right to be concerned about Foreign
Sovereign Funds like Singapore's that may value freedom of speech
lesser than the western world. Under the influences of Foreign
Sovereign Funds political freedom and speech could take a severe
beating.
One might ask on why should my case bother the western regimes?
Microsoft, Yahoo and Google are multi-billion dollars American
technological companies. Motzarella is a German European company. I
am using free email and newsgroups services provided by these
companies. By posting thousands of messages via Motzarella into
newsgroups I had helped to advertise Motzarella in the internet since
my every post carries Motzarella's name. Likewise by including Yahoo,
Microsoft Hotmail and now even Google emails addresses in my messages
I had also helped to advertise these companies. Google had become a
multi-billion dollars company by aggressive and prudent
advertisements. So advertisements could bring in much currency to a
company. When the Singapore Government Hackers prevent me from posting
via Motzarella they are preventing me from adding to the value of
Motzarella, Yahoo, Microsoft Hotmail and Google.
So are not the Singapore Government's actions affecting USA's and
European's cooperate world? The hacking of Yahoo & MSN Hotmail email
accounts is a direct violation of the US-Singapore Free Trade
Agreement. Though Motzarella Newserver is based in Germany the
Singapore Government Hackers decision to remove its name from the
Singtel Domain Name Server also violates access to telecommunication
service between Europe and Singapore. Since ASEAN is negotiating a
Free Trade Agreement with Europe or something of the like then I now
urge the Europeans to give importance to Freedom of speech and
expression as part of the Human Rights requirements that European
Union is very concerned about.
My comments are my analysis of matters and therefore are my personal
intellectual property and I reserve all rights. I choose to post them
in forum pages worldwide. Singapore Government Hackers' work to
censor me had gone against the spirit of freedom of speech and had
even violated Singapore Laws pertaining to computer usage and
electronics transmissions.
I urge the Americans and Europeans to compel the Singapore Government
to respect freedom and speech and restrain itself from harassing
private citizens.
Justice delayed is not only justice denied, and justice denied is not
only justice denied but they are also injustice enforced by in
action. Justice should not only be perceived done but it should also
be done as well. Anything less would only be ingredients to brew civil
wars.
In the recent International Bar Association conference in Singapore
the Singapore Law Minister Professor Jayakumar had reiterated about
the rule of Law for a more stable system. However one cannot easily
forget the retort from a Japanese Judge who serve in the International
Court of Justice that the Rule of Law is only the enforcement and
administration of a process or procedure and justice could only be
done if the substance of the law carries it. He went on to cite
Hitler's German Nuremberg Laws that were used to persecute and kill
Jews. Though the Jews were killed lawfully could one also say that
they were killed justly? That is the perfect example that law is not
justice. Law is just a tool while justice is a principle. A tool
could be used to destroy or create. Therefore more important than Rule
of Law is the substance of justice embedded within those laws. Only
then the government could uphold justice. If no one cares about
justice then why have a judicial system. So what if people are robbed
or murdered? Lets not forget that the laws were created to uphold
justice. To just uphold law without justice is to just feed a dead
human and there would be no meaning to the Rule of Law. To just
believe in the Rule of Law is to just believe in a Tool. We the
people should create, destroy and amend the tools to fit Justice and
the tools should not exist at the expense of Justice.
I hope that the Governments of the Free World would embrace the higher
principle that the laws were created to uphold. Justice that is all
that they need to do and force the Singapore Government to embrace as
well.
For :
".. we could not accept the paradox that the responsibility is the
least
where the power is the greatest. ... "
- said after World War II at the International Military Tribunal
(IMT),
created to try Nazi War Criminals retroactively!
I know that after I had sent out this mail the Government of Singapore
will set out on the paramount mission to search, find, chase, hunt
down and finally kill me. Well I am not afraid and am ready to die.
Or perhaps they might sacrifice me to the GODs that had sent down to
Earth their only begotten son be the only Founding Father of
Singapore.
GOODBYE.
_________________________________________________
LKYs_...@gmail.com LKYs_Mother(at)gmail.com
LKYs_...@yahoo.com LKYs_Mother(at)yahoo.com
LKYs_...@hotmail.com LKYs_Mother(at)hotmail.com
PS:
I am a STAR WARS fan and love the character Master Jedi Yoda. So I
had taken the liberty to bestow the title of LORD KNIGHT upon Master
Jedi Yoda. Therefore Yoda is now known as LORD KNIGHT YODA (LKY).
PS1:
Lately urgently I had learned to configure my computer to access a
Domain Name Server in the United States of America. So now I could
PING the Germany News Server but had not posted to Newsgroups yet. But
I am so sure that the Singapore Government would throw its obligations
under US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement to the winds and ban the
access of the American Domain Name Server Internet Protocols as
well. Once again I take this opportunity to thank the United States
of America and the European Union for providing the Singapore
Government with the Forensic Technology, knowledge and trainings to
find and persecute, prosecute or even torture dissidents. Well done.
Hypocrites !
euclid...@gmail.com
Apr 7, 2009, 2:17:39 AM4/7/09
to Protest
From "USA....@mail.fedinfo.gov" <USA....@mail.fedinfo.gov>
Apr 6 (16 hours ago)
To euclid...@gmail.com
date Apr 6, 2009 9:28 PM
subject RE: Other [T20090404001V]
Thank you for contacting USA.gov.
With regard to your e-mail concerning a violation in the
If you are not a citizen of the United States and wish to
express your opinion to the government of the United
States, please contact the U.S. Embassy in your country. To
find a U.S. embassy or consulate, please visit:
http://www.usembassy.gov/
We hope you find this information helpful.
Regards,
USA.gov Citizen Response Team
We cannot accept replies at this e-mail address. If you
have further questions, please send us a message through
our web form at:
http://USA.gov/questions
You can also call our National Contact Center at
1-800-FED-INFO (1-800-333-4636) from the USA and Canada or
1-202-208-1576 from elsewhere. We are open Monday through
Friday from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., Washington, D.C., time. We
would like your feedback on our performance. You can let us
know what you think at the link below.
http://www.info.gov/NCCsurvey.htm
[FGE8000] [FGE1110]
On Apr 5, 8:32 pm, "euclidmeg...@gmail.com" <euclidmeg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> vice.presid...@whitehouse.gov [vice.president<at>whitehouse.gov]
> singapore.office....@mail.doc.gov
> [singapore.office.box<at>mail.doc.gov]
> singaporeusemba...@state.gov [singaporeusembassy<at>state.gov]
> inqu...@useic.org [inquiry<at>useic.org]
> singaporefulbri...@state.gov [singaporefulbright<at>state.gov]
> singapore...@state.gov [singaporecon<at>state.gov]
> singapore...@state.gov [singaporeacs<at>state.gov]
> democrat_inte...@foreign.senate.gov
> [democrat_interns<at>foreign.senate.gov]
> USA.g...@mail.fedinfo.gov [USA.gov1<at>mail.fedinfo.gov]
> wsj.l...@wsj.com [wsj.ltrs<at>wsj.com]
> edit.featu...@wsj.com [edit.features<at>wsj.com]
> lett...@feer.com [letters<at>feer.com]
> colum.mur...@feer.com [colum.murphy<at>feer.com]
>
> Annex A:
> ----------------http://groups.google.com.sg/group/soc.culture.singapore/msg/b8913c3e2...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Google :http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.singapore/browse_frm/threa...
> Google achieve for the postings :http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.singapore/tree/browse_frm/...
> LKYs_Mot...@gmail.com LKYs_Mother(at)gmail.com
> LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com LKYs_Mother(at)yahoo.com
> LKYs_Mot...@hotmail.com LKYs_Mother(at)hotmail.com
Apr 6 (16 hours ago)
To euclid...@gmail.com
date Apr 6, 2009 9:28 PM
subject RE: Other [T20090404001V]
Thank you for contacting USA.gov.
With regard to your e-mail concerning a violation in the
2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement committed by the
government of Singapore:
If you are not a citizen of the United States and wish to
express your opinion to the government of the United
States, please contact the U.S. Embassy in your country. To
find a U.S. embassy or consulate, please visit:
http://www.usembassy.gov/
We hope you find this information helpful.
Regards,
USA.gov Citizen Response Team
We cannot accept replies at this e-mail address. If you
have further questions, please send us a message through
our web form at:
http://USA.gov/questions
You can also call our National Contact Center at
1-800-FED-INFO (1-800-333-4636) from the USA and Canada or
1-202-208-1576 from elsewhere. We are open Monday through
Friday from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., Washington, D.C., time. We
would like your feedback on our performance. You can let us
know what you think at the link below.
http://www.info.gov/NCCsurvey.htm
[FGE8000] [FGE1110]
On Apr 5, 8:32 pm, "euclidmeg...@gmail.com" <euclidmeg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Date : Saturday 04 April 2009
>
> From : Euclid Megara
>
> To: The USA Government,
> presid...@whitehouse.gov [president<at>whitehouse.gov]
>
> From : Euclid Megara
>
> To: The USA Government,
> vice.presid...@whitehouse.gov [vice.president<at>whitehouse.gov]
> singapore.office....@mail.doc.gov
> [singapore.office.box<at>mail.doc.gov]
> singaporeusemba...@state.gov [singaporeusembassy<at>state.gov]
> inqu...@useic.org [inquiry<at>useic.org]
> singaporefulbri...@state.gov [singaporefulbright<at>state.gov]
> singapore...@state.gov [singaporecon<at>state.gov]
> singapore...@state.gov [singaporeacs<at>state.gov]
> democrat_inte...@foreign.senate.gov
> [democrat_interns<at>foreign.senate.gov]
> USA.g...@mail.fedinfo.gov [USA.gov1<at>mail.fedinfo.gov]
> wsj.l...@wsj.com [wsj.ltrs<at>wsj.com]
> edit.featu...@wsj.com [edit.features<at>wsj.com]
> lett...@feer.com [letters<at>feer.com]
> colum.mur...@feer.com [colum.murphy<at>feer.com]
>
> 2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Violations!
> Was There Any Action Taken?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Violations!
> Was There Any Action Taken?
>
> Dear Government of United States of America,
>
> As referred in the Annex dated November 07,2007 below there were
> violations
> against the 2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement committed by the
> Government of Singapore.
>
> I would like to know if you people had taken the Annex seriously. If
> you think
> that this is a prank mail then I am sorry for bothering you.
>
> Thank you for reading and best regards.
>
> __________________________
> EUCLID MEGARA (Deceased)
> EuclidMeg...@gmail.com [EuclidMegara<at>gmail.com]
> Dear Government of United States of America,
>
> As referred in the Annex dated November 07,2007 below there were
> violations
> against the 2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement committed by the
> Government of Singapore.
>
> I would like to know if you people had taken the Annex seriously. If
> you think
> that this is a prank mail then I am sorry for bothering you.
>
> Thank you for reading and best regards.
>
> __________________________
> EUCLID MEGARA (Deceased)
>
> Annex A:
> ----------------http://groups.google.com.sg/group/soc.culture.singapore/msg/b8913c3e2...
>
> Date: Wednesday November 07, 2007
>
> Are Oppression & Suppression Only In Burma? (Wednesday November 7,
> 2007)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Wednesday November 07, 2007
>
> Are Oppression & Suppression Only In Burma? (Wednesday November 7,
> 2007)
> LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com LKYs_Mother(at)yahoo.com
> LKYs_Mot...@hotmail.com LKYs_Mother(at)hotmail.com
euclid...@gmail.com
Apr 16, 2009, 8:58:49 AM4/16/09
to Protest
s_r_n...@istana.gov.sg s_r_nathan<at>istana.gov.sg
tan_en...@istana.gov.sg tan_eng_beng<at>istana.gov.sg
doris_...@istana.gov.sg doris_tan-por<at>istana.gov.sg
lai_ch...@istana.gov.sg lai_choon_yen<at>istana.gov.sg
kok_a...@istana.gov.sg kok_ah_wang<at>istana.gov.sg
desmon...@istana.gov.sg desmond_yong<at>istana.gov.sg
ho_sa...@istana.gov.sg ho_sai_gin<at>istana.gov.sg
eddi...@psc.gov.sg eddie_teo<at>psc.gov.sg
goh_so...@psd.gov.sg goh_soon_poh<at>psd.gov.sg
shirley_...@psd.gov.sg shirley_lee-tong<at>psd.gov.sg
maggi...@psd.gov.sg maggie_chua<at>psd.gov.sg
mha_fe...@mha.gov.sg mha_feedback<at>mha.gov.sg
spf_customer_r...@spf.gov.sg
spf_customer_relations_branch<at>spf.gov.sg
khoo_b...@spf.gov.sg khoo_boon_hui<at>spf.gov.sg
soh_w...@spf.gov.sg soh_wai_wah<at>spf.gov.sg
anselm...@spf.gov.sg anselm_lopez<at>spf.gov.sg
re...@reach.gov.sg reach<at>reach.gov.sg
abdullah...@parl.gov.sg abdullah_tarmugi<at>parl.gov.sg
lee_hsi...@pmo.gov.sg lee_hsien_loong<at>pmo.gov.sg
goh_ch...@pmo.gov.sg goh_chok_tong<at>pmo.gov.sg
lee_ku...@pmo.gov.sg lee_kuan_yew<at>pmo.gov.sg
jayak...@mfa.gov.sg jayakumar_s<at>mfa.gov.sg
wong_k...@mha.gov.sg wong_kan_seng<at>mha.gov.sg
teo_ch...@mindef.gov.sg teo_chee_hean<at>mindef.gov.sg
teo_ch...@mindef.gov.sg teo_chee_hean<at>mindef.gov.sg
thar...@mof.gov.sg tharman_s<at>mof.gov.sg
khaw_b...@moh.gov.sg khaw_boon_wan<at>moh.gov.sg
yaacob_...@mewr.gov.sg yaacob_ibrahim<at>mewr.gov.sg
lim_sw...@pmo.gov.sg lim_swee_say<at>pmo.gov.sg
lim_hn...@mti.gov.sg lim_hng_kiang<at>mti.gov.sg
lim_bo...@pmo.gov.sg lim_boon_heng<at>pmo.gov.sg
mah_b...@mnd.gov.sg mah_bow_tan<at>mnd.gov.sg
ng_en...@moe.gov.sg ng_eng_hen<at>moe.gov.sg
ng_en...@mindef.gov.sg ng_eng_hen<at>mindef.gov.sg
vivia...@mcys.gov.sg vivian_bala<at>mcys.gov.sg
raymo...@mot.gov.sg raymond_lim<at>mot.gov.sg
k_sha...@mlaw.gov.sg k_shanmugam<at>mlaw.gov.sg
gan_ki...@mom.gov.sg gan_kim_yong<at>mom.gov.sg
lim_hw...@mof.gov.sg lim_hwee_hua<at>mof.gov.sg
lim_hw...@mot.gov.sg lim_hwee_hua<at>mot.gov.sg
lt...@mica.gov.sg lty1<at>mica.gov.sg
ho_pe...@mlaw.gov.sg ho_peng_kee<at>mlaw.gov.sg
ho_pe...@mha.gov.sg ho_peng_kee<at>mha.gov.sg
balaji_s...@mfa.gov.sg balaji_sadasivan<at>mfa.gov.sg
zainul_abi...@mfa.gov.sg zainul_abidin_rasheed<at>mfa.gov.sg
s_is...@mti.gov.sg s_iswaran<at>mti.gov.sg
s_is...@moe.gov.sg s_iswaran<at>moe.gov.sg
grac...@mnd.gov.sg grace_fu<at>mnd.gov.sg
grac...@moe.gov.sg grace_fu<at>moe.gov.sg
foo_ye...@mcys.gov.sg foo_yee_shoon<at>mcys.gov.sg
heng_c...@pmo.gov.sg heng_chee_how<at>pmo.gov.sg
ko...@mindef.gov.sg kootk<at>mindef.gov.sg
yis...@mti.gov.sg yishyan<at>mti.gov.sg
yis...@mom.gov.sg yishyan<at>mom.gov.sg
matthi...@pa.gov.sg matthias_yao<at>pa.gov.sg
indrane...@drewnapier.com indranee.rajah<at>drewnapier.com
teo_h...@pa.gov.sg teo_ho_pin<at>pa.gov.sg
amy_...@mewr.gov.sg amy_khor<at>mewr.gov.sg
amy_...@pa.gov.sg amy_khor<at>pa.gov.sg
zainudi...@pa.gov.sg zainudin_nordin<at>pa.gov.sg
haw...@mom.gov.sg hawazi<at>mom.gov.sg
haw...@moh.gov.sg hawazi<at>moh.gov.sg
masagos_...@moe.gov.sg masagos_zulkifli<at>moe.gov.sg
masagos_...@mha.gov.sg masagos_zulkifli<at>mha.gov.sg
teo_se...@mcys.gov.sg teo_ser_luck<at>mcys.gov.sg
maliki...@mnd.gov.sg maliki_osman<at>mnd.gov.sg
ct...@yewtee.org.sg ctyeo<at>yewtee.org.sg
chi...@singnet.com.sg chiamco<at>singnet.com.sg
leebo...@live.com.sg leeboonyang<at>live.com.sg
charle...@singaporeair.com.sg
charles_chong<at>singaporeair.com.sg
l...@wp.sg ltk<at>wp.sg
chans...@gmail.com chansoosen<at>gmail.com
inde...@singnet.com.sg inderjit<at>singnet.com.sg
dr.li...@gmail.com dr.lilyneo<at>gmail.com
sen...@ntuc.org.sg senght<at>ntuc.org.sg
boona...@drewnapier.com boonann.sin<at>drewnapier.com
a...@ii-vi.com.sg amm<at>ii-vi.com.sg
ams...@singnet.com.sg amshktc<at>singnet.com.sg
ong...@gmail.com ongah5<at>gmail.com
on...@singnet.com.sg ongkm<at>singnet.com.sg
ye...@ntuc.org.sg yeogk<at>ntuc.org.sg
arthur....@gmail.com arthur.fong339<at>gmail.com
pio...@pap.org.sg pioneer<at>pap.org.sg
ho...@singnet.com.sg hogcm<at>singnet.com.sg
penn...@prpg-grc.sg penny_low<at>prpg-grc.sg
on...@mptc.org.sg ongsh<at>mptc.org.sg
cynthi...@aljuniedgrc.org.sg cynthia.phua<at>aljuniedgrc.org.sg
we...@stengg.com weesk<at>stengg.com
hal...@ntuc.org.sg halimah<at>ntuc.org.sg
ire...@iseas.edu.sg ireneng<at>iseas.edu.sg
ykb...@gmail.com ykbaey<at>gmail.com
chrisd...@leenlee.com.sg chrisdesouza<at>leenlee.com.sg
fatimah.a...@sgh.com.sg fatimah.abd.lateef<at>sgh.com.sg
hri....@drewnapier.com hri.kumar<at>drewnapier.com
liang....@pcf.org.sg liang.eng.hwa<at>pcf.org.sg
lbc...@singnet.com.sg lbclaw<at>singnet.com.sg
fai...@nus.edu.sg faishal<at>nus.edu.sg
sea...@fairprice.com.sg seahkp<at>fairprice.com.sg
sam...@cdac.org.sg samtan<at>cdac.org.sg
te...@ntuc.org.sg teoj<at>ntuc.org.sg
alvi...@wongpartnership.com.sg alvin.yeo<at>wongpartnership.com.sg
ask...@keathong.com ask.mp<at>keathong.com
vpm...@gmail.com vpmlam<at>gmail.com
l...@lbw.com.sg lbw<at>lbw.com.sg
leeel...@gmail.com leeellengh<at>gmail.com
wee...@starhub.net.sg weekiak<at>starhub.net.sg
mich...@harryelias.com.sg michaelp<at>harryelias.com.sg
dp...@starhub.net.sg dphua<at>starhub.net.sg
denis...@pathlight.org.sg denisephua<at>pathlight.org.sg
jess...@hotmail.com jesstansn<at>hotmail.com
syl...@wp.sg sylvia<at>wp.sg
nmp...@rafflesmedical.com nmploo<at>rafflesmedical.com
eun...@euniceolsen.com eunice<at>euniceolsen.com
cha...@ntuc.org.sg chamhf<at>ntuc.org.sg
gautam....@sg.pwc.com gautam.banerjee<at>sg.pwc.com
swk...@nus.edu.sg swkkkm<at>nus.edu.sg
ek...@yahoo.com.sg ekhew<at>yahoo.com.sg
phuaj...@gmail.com phuajessie<at>gmail.com
siewk...@gmail.com siewkumhong<at>gmail.com
law...@nus.edu.sg lawtla<at>nus.edu.sg
pa...@parl.gov.sg parl<at>parl.gov.sg
oscaro...@sgpoolz.com.sg oscaroliveiro<at>sgpoolz.com.sg
othm...@yahoo.com.sg othman_he<at>yahoo.com.sg
Thilaghaava...@parl.gov.sg
Thilaghaavathy_GOVINDAN<at>parl.gov.sg
audre...@agc.gov.sg audrey_wong<at>agc.gov.sg
sim_k...@agc.gov.sg sim_kim_poh<at>agc.gov.sg
jeffre...@agc.gov.sg jeffrey_chan<at>agc.gov.sg
patri...@agc.gov.sg patricia_ng<at>agc.gov.sg
audre...@agc.gov.sg audrey_wong<at>agc.gov.sg
a...@agc.gov.sg agc<at>agc.gov.sg
pres...@lawsoc.org.sg president<at>lawsoc.org.sg
law...@lawsoc.org.sg lawsoc<at>lawsoc.org.sg
aw...@aware.org.sg aware<at>aware.org.sg
dire...@aware.org.sg director<at>aware.org.sg
chan_se...@supcourt.gov.sg chan_sek_keong<at>supcourt.gov.sg
supcourt...@supcourt.gov.sg
supcourt_registry<at>supcourt.gov.sg
Chao_H...@agc.gov.sg Chao_Hick_Tin<at>agc.gov.sg
koh_be...@supcourt.gov.sg koh_beng_yan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
lean...@supcourt.gov.sg leana_lim<at>supcourt.gov.sg
s_p_rav...@supcourt.gov.sg s_p_raveendran<at>supcourt.gov.sg
caro...@supcourt.gov.sg carol_yap<at>supcourt.gov.sg
agne...@supcourt.gov.sg agnes_yao<at>supcourt.gov.sg
tay_le...@supcourt.gov.sg tay_lee_hoon<at>supcourt.gov.sg
jane...@supcourt.gov.sg jane_tan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
oh_so...@supcourt.gov.sg oh_soh_wan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
yong_m...@supcourt.gov.sg yong_mei_june<at>supcourt.gov.sg
leong_...@supcourt.gov.sg leong_yu_fun<at>supcourt.gov.sg
patric...@supcourt.gov.sg patricia_see<at>supcourt.gov.sg
ginny...@supcourt.gov.sg ginny_tham<at>supcourt.gov.sg
norashid...@supcourt.gov.sg norashidah_laily<at>supcourt.gov.sg
cylin...@supcourt.gov.sg cylin_chua<at>supcourt.gov.sg
adeli...@supcourt.gov.sg adelia_tay<at>supcourt.gov.sg
eugen...@supcourt.gov.sg eugene_chng<at>supcourt.gov.sg
foo_ch...@supcourt.gov.sg foo_chee_hock<at>supcourt.gov.sg
haryati...@supcourt.gov.sg haryati_sungit<at>supcourt.gov.sg
audre...@supcourt.gov.sg audrey_lim<at>supcourt.gov.sg
susa...@supcourt.gov.sg susan_ho<at>supcourt.gov.sg
sharo...@supcourt.gov.sg sharon_lim<at>supcourt.gov.sg
tan_ke...@supcourt.gov.sg tan_ken_hwee<at>supcourt.gov.sg
kenne...@supcourt.gov.sg kenneth_yap<at>supcourt.gov.sg
yeong_...@supcourt.gov.sg yeong_zee_kin<at>supcourt.gov.sg
corn...@supcourt.gov.sg cornie_ng<at>supcourt.gov.sg
davi...@supcourt.gov.sg david_lee<at>supcourt.gov.sg
leong_k...@supcourt.gov.sg leong_kwang_ian<at>supcourt.gov.sg
jeyendra...@supcourt.gov.sg
jeyendran_jeyapal<at>supcourt.gov.sg
janic...@supcourt.gov.sg janice_wong<at>supcourt.gov.sg
teo_gu...@supcourt.gov.sg teo_guan_siew<at>supcourt.gov.sg
tan_we...@supcourt.gov.sg tan_wen_hsien<at>supcourt.gov.sg
denis...@supcourt.gov.sg denise_wong<at>supcourt.gov.sg
lim_j...@supcourt.gov.sg lim_jian_yi<at>supcourt.gov.sg
then...@supcourt.gov.sg then_ling<at>supcourt.gov.sg
hung_ni...@supcourt.gov.sg hung_ning_shing<at>supcourt.gov.sg
tan_we...@supcourt.gov.sg tan_wen_shan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
dariu...@supcourt.gov.sg darius_chan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
saqib...@supcourt.gov.sg saqib_alam<at>supcourt.gov.sg
leong_w...@supcourt.gov.sg leong_weng_tat<at>supcourt.gov.sg
nathani...@supcourt.gov.sg nathaniel_khng<at>supcourt.gov.sg
lione...@supcourt.gov.sg lionel_leo<at>supcourt.gov.sg
peh_a...@supcourt.gov.sg peh_aik_hin<at>supcourt.gov.sg
chen_...@supcourt.gov.sg chen_siyuan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
adria...@supcourt.gov.sg adrian_loo<at>supcourt.gov.sg
pao_p...@supcourt.gov.sg pao_pei_yu<at>supcourt.gov.sg
cryst...@supcourt.gov.sg crystal_tan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
tan_lia...@supcourt.gov.sg tan_liang_ying<at>supcourt.gov.sg
eunic...@supcourt.gov.sg eunice_chua<at>supcourt.gov.sg
ho_ma...@supcourt.gov.sg ho_may_kim<at>supcourt.gov.sg
kathry...@supcourt.gov.sg kathryn_thong<at>supcourt.gov.sg
tan_s...@supcourt.gov.sg tan_sze_yao<at>supcourt.gov.sg
prem_raj_...@supcourt.gov.sg
prem_raj_prabakaran<at>supcourt.gov.sg
paul...@supcourt.gov.sg paul_chan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
loui...@supcourt.gov.sg louis_ng<at>supcourt.gov.sg
lau_k...@supcourt.gov.sg lau_kah_hee<at>supcourt.gov.sg
zhuo_j...@supcourt.gov.sg zhuo_jiaxiang<at>supcourt.gov.sg
tan_ka...@supcourt.gov.sg tan_kai_liang<at>supcourt.gov.sg
jorda...@supcourt.gov.sg jordan_tan<at>supcourt.gov.sg
sngeeta_de...@supcourt.gov.sg
sngeeta_devi_surannad<at>supcourt.gov.sg
l...@wp.org.sg ltk<at>wp.org.sg
yout...@wp.sg youthwing<at>wp.sg
hg...@wp.sg hgcc<at>wp.sg
e...@wp.sg eac<at>wp.sg
n...@wp.sg nac<at>wp.sg
tt...@wp.sg tttan<at>wp.sg
berna...@wp.sg bernardchen<at>wp.sg
choon...@wp.sg choongyong<at>wp.sg
grass...@wp.org.sg grassroots<at>wp.org.sg
w...@wp.sg wp<at>wp.sg
secre...@youngpap.org.sg secretariat<at>youngpap.org.sg
14_...@pap.org.sg 14_bsec<at>pap.org.sg
04_...@pap.org.sg 04_bsec<at>pap.org.sg
pa...@pap.org.sg paphq<at>pap.org.sg
spe...@singaporedemocrat.org speakup<at>singaporedemocrat.org
spe...@yoursdp.org speakup<at>yoursdp.org
ne...@newstoday.com.sg news<at>newstoday.com.sg
myt...@newstoday.com.sg mytoday<at>newstoday.com.sg
der...@newstoday.com.sg derrick<at>newstoday.com.sg
el...@newstoday.com.sg eliza<at>newstoday.com.sg
omy...@sph.com.sg omy...@sph.com.sg
li...@sph.com.sg limlh<at>sph.com.sg
sph...@sph.com.sg sphcorp<at>sph.com.sg
ray...@sph.com.sg rayteoh<at>sph.com.sg
tan...@sph.com.sg tanska<at>sph.com.sg
eliz...@sph.com.sg elizwong<at>sph.com.sg
cka...@sph.com.sg ckaren<at>sph.com.sg
sim...@sph.com.sg simcja<at>sph.com.sg
el...@sph.com.sg elsie<at>sph.com.sg
vik...@sph.com.sg vikram<at>sph.com.sg
ci...@sph.com.sg circs<at>sph.com.sg
CA...@sph.com.sg CATS<at>sph.com.sg
a1s...@sph.com.sg a1sales<at>sph.com.sg
stf...@sph.com.sg stforum<at>sph.com.sg
c...@mediacorp.com.sg cna<at>mediacorp.com.sg
newse...@channelnewsasia.com newseditor<at>channelnewsasia.com
repo...@channelnewsasia.com reporting<at>channelnewsasia.com
let...@iht.com letters<at>iht.com
letters...@ft.com letters.editor<at>ft.com
jan...@sph.com.sg janadas<at>sph.com.sg
news...@wsj.com newsedit<at>wsj.com
feed...@wsj.com feedback<at>wsj.com
wsj....@wsj.com wsj.ltrs<at>wsj.com
edit.f...@wsj.com edit.features<at>wsj.com
let...@feer.com letters<at>feer.com
colum....@feer.com colum.murphy<at>feer.com
wolf...@motzarella.org wolfgang<at>motzarella.org
edit.f...@wsj.com edit.features<at>wsj.com
let...@feer.com letters<at>feer.com
colum....@feer.com colum.murphy<at>feer.com
pres...@whitehouse.gov president<at>whitehouse.gov
vice_pr...@whitehouse.gov vice_president<at>whitehouse.gov
comm...@whitehouse.gov comments<at>whitehouse.gov
sg-web-p...@ec.europa.eu sg-web-president<at>ec.europa.eu
euro-om...@europarl.eu.int euro-ombudsman<at>europarl.eu.int
entr-...@ec.europa.eu entr-reach<at>ec.europa.eu
eacea-e...@ec.europa.eu eacea-eurydice<at>ec.europa.eu
webadm...@unog.ch webadmin.hchr<at>unog.ch
webm...@unog.ch webmaster<at>unog.ch
visi...@unog.ch visit-gva<at>unog.ch
lib...@unog.ch library<at>unog.ch
arodr...@unog.ch arodriguez<at>unog.ch
mest...@unog.ch mestinel<at>unog.ch
info...@unece.org info.ece<at>unece.org
webmas...@unece.org webmaster.ece<at>unece.org
global...@un.org globalcompact<at>un.org
enq...@dfid.gov.uk enquiry<at>dfid.gov.uk
enqu...@dfid.gov.uk enquiries<at>dfid.gov.uk
press...@dfid.gov.uk pressoffice<at>dfid.gov.uk
k-wil...@dfid.gov.uk k-williams<at>dfid.gov.uk
billy-...@dfid.gov.uk billy-stewart<at>dfid.gov.uk
presse...@bk.bund.de pressestelle<at>bk.bund.de
posts...@bmvbs.bund.de poststelle<at>bmvbs.bund.de
in...@unawestminster.org.uk info<at>unawestminster.org.uk
intern...@bmwi.bund.de internetpost<at>bmwi.bund.de
posts...@bmz.bund.de poststelle<at>bmz.bund.de
in...@bmwi.bund.de info<at>bmwi.bund.de
juerge...@bmwi.bund.de juergen.rohm<at>bmwi.bund.de
posts...@auswaertiges-amt.de poststelle<at>auswaertiges-amt.de
posts...@bpra.bund.de poststelle<at>bpra.bund.de
pre...@bpra.bund.de presse<at>bpra.bund.de
Bundespraesiden...@bpra.bund.de
Bundespraesident.Horst.Koehler<at>bpra.bund.de
bve...@bundesverfassungsgericht.de
bverfg<at>bundesverfassungsgericht.de
Intern...@bundesregierung.de
InternetPost<at>bundesregierung.de
publik...@bundesregierung.de
publikationen<at>bundesregierung.de
presse...@bundestag.de pressereferat<at>bundestag.de
bettina.h...@bundestag.de
bettina.herlitzius<at>bundestag.de
vorzimm...@bundestag.de vorzimmer.puk4<at>bundestag.de
singapo...@yahoogroups.com
singaporeforum<at>yahoogroups.com
theop...@yahoogroups.com theoptical<at>ahoogroups.com
ivy...@ntucmedia.org.sg
ivytang<at>ntucmedia.org.sg
tank...@ozemail.com.au
tanktalk<at>ozemail.com.au
theop...@yahoogroups.com theoptical<at>yahoogroups.com
tank...@ozemail.com.au
tanktalk<at>ozemail.com.au
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages