Date : Saturday 04 April 2009
From : Euclid Megara
To: The USA Government,
presid...@whitehouse.gov [president<at>whitehouse.gov]
vice.presid...@whitehouse.gov [vice.president<at>whitehouse.gov]
singapore.office....@mail.doc.gov
[singapore.office.box<at>mail.doc.gov]
singaporeusemba...@state.gov [singaporeusembassy<at>state.gov]
inqu...@useic.org [inquiry<at>useic.org]
singaporefulbri...@state.gov [singaporefulbright<at>state.gov]
singapore...@state.gov [singaporecon<at>state.gov]
singapore...@state.gov [singaporeacs<at>state.gov]
democrat_inte...@foreign.senate.gov
[democrat_interns<at>foreign.senate.gov]
USA.g...@mail.fedinfo.gov [USA.gov1<at>mail.fedinfo.gov]
wsj.l...@wsj.com [wsj.ltrs<at>wsj.com]
edit.featu...@wsj.com [edit.features<at>wsj.com]
lett...@feer.com [letters<at>feer.com]
colum.mur...@feer.com [colum.murphy<at>feer.com]
2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Violations!
Was There Any Action Taken?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Dear Government of United States of America,
As referred in the Annex dated November 07,2007 below there were
violations
against the 2004 US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement committed by the
Government of Singapore.
I would like to know if you people had taken the Annex seriously. If
you think
that this is a prank mail then I am sorry for bothering you.
Thank you for reading and best regards.
__________________________
EUCLID MEGARA (Deceased)
EuclidMeg...@gmail.com [EuclidMegara<at>gmail.com]
Annex A:
----------------
http://groups.google.com.sg/group/soc.culture.singapore/msg/b8913c3e2...
Date: Wednesday November 07, 2007
Are Oppression & Suppression Only In Burma? (Wednesday November 7,
2007)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
To:
k...@un.org
wynho...@un.org
maki...@un.org
globalcomp...@un.org
wynho...@un.org
enqu...@dfid.gov.uk
postste...@bmz.bund.de
i...@bmwi.bund.de
postste...@auswaertiges-amt.de
postste...@bpra.bund.de
InternetP...@bundesregierung.de
presserefe...@bundestag.de
presid...@whitehouse.gov
vice_presid...@whitehouse.gov
comme...@whitehouse.gov
sg-web-presid...@ec.europa.eu
euro-ombuds...@europarl.eu.int
s_r_nat...@istana.gov.sg
lee_hsien_lo...@pmo.gov.sg
abdullah_tarm...@parl.gov.sg
p...@parl.gov.sg
siewkumh...@gmail.com
hri.ku...@drewnapier.com
charles_ch...@singaporeair.com.sg
yamk...@pacific.net.sg
chia...@singnet.com.sg
l...@wp.org.sg
chan_sek_ke...@supcourt.gov.sg
koh_beng_...@supcourt.gov.sg
leana_...@supcourt.gov.sg
subct_regist...@subct.gov.sg
chao_hick_...@agc.gov.sg
a...@agc.gov.sg
presid...@lawsoc.org.sg
law...@lawsoc.org.sg
direc...@aware.org.sg
n...@newstoday.com.sg
stfo...@sph.com.sg
t...@sph.com.sg
w...@wp.sg
spea...@singaporedemocrat.org
pa...@pap.org.sg
TheOpti...@yahoogroups.com
TheOptical-ow...@yahoogroups.com
report...@channelnewsasia.com
lett...@iht.com
letters.edi...@ft.com
lett...@feer.com
webadmin.h...@unog.ch
jana...@sph.com.sg
and...@sph.com.sg
newsedit...@wsj.com
feedb...@wsj.com
wolfg...@motzarella.org
Are Oppression & Suppression Only In Burma? (Wednesday November 7,
2007)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Dear United Nations & Western Regimes,
Lately you guys had been busy pressing for human rights in Burma.
Obviously you had been pressing for changes to improve human rights
and quality of life in Burma. Your call to ASEAN, now chaired by
Singapore, to make a more drastic stance on the situation had been met
with only rhetoric. Of course the governments of Singapore and other
ASEAN states had reiterated that the military junta in Burma is
fundamental and cannot be done away with and that any change must
involve the military junta. In addition to that, ASEAN also stresses
that its influences would mean nothing if the giants India and China
won't help out. So Singapore being the chair of ASEAN had put up an
image that it is all for human rights but only could not act to make
changes. Well should the world believe Singapore Government's
rhetoric? Or should it care to know more about what this Singapore
Government does in its own territory before coming to any conclusion?
Many people in ASEAN nations protested against the arrest of
protestors in Burma. Well as far as I know only in Singapore the
government arrested all four protestors who protested outside the
presidential palace. Those four protestors' demands included that the
Singapore Government clarify its relationship with the Burmese
Government that not only produces and exports narcotics to the rest of
the world but also deny freedom of speech and expression to its people
who want self determination via democracy or via representative
elected cameral.
I now tend to think that the Singapore Government is just giving lip
services to the United Nations to appear good in the eyes of the
Europeans with whom ASEAN is now negotiating a Free Trade Agreement or
something of the like. However the Europeans as are concerned of
human rights violations in ASEAN. For example a few months ago some
European Union Parliament Members made a tour of the ASEAN region.
These European MPs had said that they were able to have public forums
with the people in Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines ...etc. However
these Europeans MPs were denied permission by the Singapore Police to
address the Singapore public in an indoor conference. Even the
Deputy Speaker of Singapore Parliament said that she could not
interfere in police decision since it involved possible law and order
problems. Well that is what the Singapore Government had been using
to suppress and oppress rightful and just political dissent. So if
law and order in public are all that important that the Government of
Singapore has no choice but to resort to strict procedures, laws and
rules in a densely populated city and country, then what law and order
problems are there in the internet forum pages that express political
dissatisfaction with the Government of Singapore that the Government
of Singapore had to resort to Draconian measures to deny freedom of
speech and expression?
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I am affected directly by one such
oppressive suppression. I am sorry that I have to waste your time to
elaborate this.
In Singapore many companies are owned and operated by the government
directly or indirectly. One such company is Singapore
Telecommunications(Singtel) which is more than half owned by Temasek
Holdings which is one of the investment companies of the Ministry of
Finance of Singapore. Lee Hsien Loong the Prime Minister of Singapore
is also the Finance Minister, and his second wife is the Chief
Executive Officer of Temasek Holdings that controls Singapore
Telecommunications.
Singnet, a member of the Singapore Telecommunications Group, offers
subscribers access to Internet. I am personally accessing Internet
via a Singet Internet subscription plan. As an Internet Service
Provider (ISP) Singtel is obligated or at least should be obligated to
provide the services it is collecting fees for. Internet provides
access to many world wide web (WWW) portals like Google, Yahoo, MSN,
AOL ...etc.
Certain world-wide-web portals like Google also provide users access
to read from and post to Newsgroups (also known as USENET).
Newsgroups are electronic forums pages. Example of a Newsgroup via
Google :
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.singapore/browse_frm/threa...
I am also a user of these Newsgroups. I read from and post to these
Newsgroups for quite sometime by now. Many criticise my postings and
I too criticise many postings of others. I must admit that America
and Europe had done a fantastic job of exporting and making available
freedom of speech and expression to the international community via
the Internet and Newsgroups and I thank you for that.
Even before Google, Newsgroups till the present time are made
available by Newsgroup servers(computers). Messages are read from and
posted to these Newsgroup servers via the use of News Network Transfer
Protocol (NNTP) that is transmittable via the Internet.
NNPT is just an electronic envelope (or electronic frame) that carries
messages and is sent and received through the Internet to post to and
read from Newsgroup servers. There are many Newsgroup servers
worldwide.
Newsgroup Servers would reject these NNTP or electronic envelopes and
the message they carry if these NNTP envelopes did not carry certain
necessary basic information like:
Name (That Poster wish to be displayed in post) :
Organisation (Optional) :
Email Address (The Email Address of poster) :
Reply Email Address (Optional) :
NewsServer Name :
News Port (NNTP) :
NewsServer Account Name :
NewsServer Account Password :
The basic information that I used were as follows:
Name (That Poster wish to be displayed in post) : LKYs Mother
Organisation (Optional) :
Email Address (The Email Address of poster) : LKYs_Mot...@yahoo.com
Reply Email Address (Optional) :
NewsServer Name : news.motzarella.net
News Port (NNTP) : 119 (commonly 119 for non-encrypted
communications)
NewsServer Account Name : fernandez1
NewsServer Account Password : **********
So anyone who wants to post to or read from Newsgroups forums using
NNTP must have read or post access to a Newsgroup Server. This
access is granted by the issuing of usernames and passwords by the
Newsgroup servers. Usually there is no need for username and password
to read from Newsgroups Servers but most of the time to post to
Newsgroups Servers username and
...
|
