Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
project-voldemort
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Maven (and minor bug)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Alex Feinberg  
View profile  
 More options May 19 2011, 5:19 pm
From: Alex Feinberg <feinb...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:19:43 -0700
Local: Thurs, May 19 2011 5:19 pm
Subject: Re: [project-voldemort] Re: Maven (and minor bug)
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I'd love to see a maven version, or at least the ability generate a
pom.xml reliably from ant

If someone wants to contribute a patch, that would be great.

However, a whole-sale mavenification may be difficult: my suggestion
is to either generate a pom.xml or consider ivy

(No specific bias for or against maven, just it's generally difficult
to mavenize an existing ant project)

Good catch on the file separator: unfortunately we don't have any
Windows machine to test this on. Feel free to make a pull request.

Thanks,
- Alex

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Eric Turcotte <lumin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Organizing the project into submodules makes it a little easier to
> build the individual components.  Maven 3's has the parallel build
> feature but this project builds fast already.  It's easy to get
> carried away with splitting the project into submodules though.  There
> could be client, core, server, store api, serialization api, 1 for
> each contrib folder, 1 for each type of store, etc.  Any thoughts on
> the right level of granularity?

> On May 19, 1:10 pm, Sunny Gleason <sunny.glea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1, I'd love to see the Maven thing happen

>> Bonus points if there's separate jars for api and
>> implementation to help make it easy for storage
>> engine implementors...  :)

>> Willing to pitch in as well,

>> -Sunny

>> On 5/19/11, Eric Turcotte <lumin...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > Is anyone still working on coveting the project to Maven?  Is this a
>> > possibility so it can be available on Maven Central?  I'd like to work
>> > on this effort.

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "project-voldemort" group.
> To post to this group, send email to project-voldemort@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to project-voldemort+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/project-voldemort?hl=en.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google