                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: ctasada <ctas...@gmail.com>
To: project-voldemort@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <caa4da3f-2dff-48f2-b10a-79eec549c180@googlegroups.com>
Subject: AdminClient fetchKeys performance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1481_4044202.1349210994555"

------=_Part_1481_4044202.1349210994555
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1482_23184810.1349210994555"

------=_Part_1482_23184810.1349210994555
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi guys,

What's the expected performance of the AdminClient.fetchKeys? I'm using it 
but the behaviour is a bit heretic. I get something like 10K keys every 1.5 
seconds, which is good, but then suddenly, the streaming stops for 30 to 60 
seconds.

My suspicious is that the stops are caused by BDB reading, since some keys 
may not be cached. Is there any way to validate this theory? 

Also, checking the code I see that internally is doing 
storeEngine.get(key). Wouldn't it be more optimal to use getAll with blocks 
of keys?

Regards,
Carlos.

------=_Part_1482_23184810.1349210994555
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi guys,<div><br></div><div>What's the expected performance of the AdminClient.fetchKeys? I'm using it but the behaviour is a bit heretic. I get something like 10K keys every 1.5 seconds, which is good, but then suddenly, the streaming stops for 30 to 60 seconds.</div><div><br></div><div>My suspicious is that the stops are caused by BDB reading, since some keys may not be cached. Is there any way to validate this theory?&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Also, checking the code I see that internally is doing storeEngine.get(key). Wouldn't it be more optimal to use getAll with blocks of keys?</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Carlos.</div>
------=_Part_1482_23184810.1349210994555--

------=_Part_1481_4044202.1349210994555--