Re: [project-voldemort] KV store w/ persistence
35 views
Skip to first unread message
Geir Magnusson
Nov 9, 2012, 6:24:49 AM11/9/12
to project-...@googlegroups.com
What's wrong with bdb?
Marc Logemann <marc.l...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi,
we are checking alternatives for our current redis way of doing this. We heavily use key value collections to store agregated statistics data. So we have heavy writes, not so heavy reads on our redis instance. We are quite happy the way how redis works but since we want to implement / embed the NoSQL server in one of our java based products, redis being C based is a no go. So we evaluated a lot of projects. Voldemort comes nearest in terms of our requirements for now. I wrote about that there.
May i ask some questions to this group because we really need to get some facts right:
- We certainly dont want to use BDB. Is there an alternative (file based) store available for Voldemort? We love file based because of freedom wrt installations.
- Is an embedded installation scenario with just one node ok? Scaling to different nodes just as an option...
- what about range queries for keys?
Thanks a lot for clearification. If we would settle on Voldemort, our dev team would be happy to contribute back in some form. We just need to make a sane decission how to go on and since its for two of our products, it would be a long lasting decission ;-)
Marc
CEO LOGENTIS GmbH
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "project-voldemort" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to project-voldem...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/project-voldemort?hl=en.
Marc Logemann <marc.l...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi,
we are checking alternatives for our current redis way of doing this. We heavily use key value collections to store agregated statistics data. So we have heavy writes, not so heavy reads on our redis instance. We are quite happy the way how redis works but since we want to implement / embed the NoSQL server in one of our java based products, redis being C based is a no go. So we evaluated a lot of projects. Voldemort comes nearest in terms of our requirements for now. I wrote about that there.
May i ask some questions to this group because we really need to get some facts right:
- We certainly dont want to use BDB. Is there an alternative (file based) store available for Voldemort? We love file based because of freedom wrt installations.
- Is an embedded installation scenario with just one node ok? Scaling to different nodes just as an option...
- what about range queries for keys?
Thanks a lot for clearification. If we would settle on Voldemort, our dev team would be happy to contribute back in some form. We just need to make a sane decission how to go on and since its for two of our products, it would be a long lasting decission ;-)
Marc
CEO LOGENTIS GmbH
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "project-voldemort" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to project-voldem...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/project-voldemort?hl=en.
Marc Logemann
Nov 9, 2012, 11:41:36 AM11/9/12
to project-...@googlegroups.com
uhh. two threads now about my question.... anyway....
My answer: Licensing.
Marc
My answer: Licensing.
Marc
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages