Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Suggest about data sharding
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
XiaoFei  
View profile  
 More options Dec 2 2011, 8:33 pm
From: XiaoFei <sor...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:33:18 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Dec 2 2011 8:33 pm
Subject: Suggest about data sharding
hi all,

We prepare to store our data which about 2000 million entries in
voldemort (2 million entries increase daily). Size of key is 6 bytes,
with 16 ~ 96 bytes value.  After estimating in 3 nodes, 2 replicas,
put 1 million entries, we got about 150Mb in every node. Whole data
will be 300Gb in every node.

Is there anyone have performance data about bdb je that hold such big
data ? ( 2000*2/3 million entries in one bdb je enviroment. )
Should i shard data in several stores (bdb.one.env.per.store=true) ?
How many entries in one store is efficient?

Any suggest is appreciated. Thank you.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »