<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>ProcessTalk Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk</link>
  <description>For open discussions re Process by Jumsoft</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Strange Column Behaviour</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8ff48bd1c0feddf4/b6157d5c67c627c3?show_docid=b6157d5c67c627c3</link>
  <description>
  I thought Jumsoft was watching this little list too. Maybe you should &lt;br&gt; post on the PIM list.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8ff48bd1c0feddf4/b6157d5c67c627c3?show_docid=b6157d5c67c627c3</guid>
  <author>
  dancingbr...@gmail.com
  (db)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 02:25:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Strange Column Behaviour</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8ff48bd1c0feddf4/2b1da4ebcd7aad55?show_docid=2b1da4ebcd7aad55</link>
  <description>
  It&#39;s so true, customer service is crucial to reputation. Every company, &lt;br&gt; software not, has it&#39;s problems, what counts is what you DO about it. &lt;br&gt; We&#39;ve turned the occassional client problem into a positive by talking &lt;br&gt; to them and sorting it out straight away. In fact it ends up leaving a &lt;br&gt; good taste where-as to leave it to fester leaves a very sour taste they
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8ff48bd1c0feddf4/2b1da4ebcd7aad55?show_docid=2b1da4ebcd7aad55</guid>
  <author>
  john.rick...@mac.com
  (JR-London)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 10:14:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Strange Column Behaviour</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8ff48bd1c0feddf4/aee42f2a9e88efbb?show_docid=aee42f2a9e88efbb</link>
  <description>
  Hi JR, &lt;br&gt; It is too bad the lack of response from these developers. It seems so &lt;br&gt; many want to make the big money but fall short where it matters.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8ff48bd1c0feddf4/aee42f2a9e88efbb?show_docid=aee42f2a9e88efbb</guid>
  <author>
  dancingbr...@gmail.com
  (db)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:48:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Strange Column Behaviour</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8ff48bd1c0feddf4/1e30ebfa947a61a0?show_docid=1e30ebfa947a61a0</link>
  <description>
  I too am finding some odd behaviour. I want to use Process to give me &lt;br&gt; an at-a-glace of sales prospects I&#39;m talking to. I&#39;ve added extra &lt;br&gt; columns for name, phone number etc. &lt;br&gt; I had to enter one name which was a little longer than I&#39;d allowed for &lt;br&gt; so dragged the column a little wide to make room for the name. Process
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8ff48bd1c0feddf4/1e30ebfa947a61a0?show_docid=1e30ebfa947a61a0</guid>
  <author>
  john.rick...@mac.com
  (JR-London)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:31:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Funky item-list behavior</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/44336496a0bb2b97/2b5de100c3260e65?show_docid=2b5de100c3260e65</link>
  <description>
  Hi there. I just installed Process on my computer and I&#39;m testing it &lt;br&gt; out as I&#39;m looking for a way to keep track of my projects and keep a &lt;br&gt; lock on my productiveness. I like the potential of this program, but it &lt;br&gt; seems a little rough still.. but maybe it&#39;s me. &lt;br&gt; So I&#39;ve created a project, and I notice that the item-list doesn&#39;t act
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/44336496a0bb2b97/2b5de100c3260e65?show_docid=2b5de100c3260e65</guid>
  <author>
  keno-m...@nosubstance.net
  (keno)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 22:06:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Just pulled down the Beta</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8fd2fc1257ab95d1/d9fdc87db6daa8e3?show_docid=d9fdc87db6daa8e3</link>
  <description>
  There is facility within OS X for handling dates properly; I don&#39;t know &lt;br&gt; why they wouldn&#39;t use them. &lt;br&gt; I actually wish we (the US) could adopt the more logical european &lt;br&gt; format for dates (day,month year) Using Apple&#39;s internal date &lt;br&gt; structures should allow us all to use what we want, with no consequence &lt;br&gt; to others.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8fd2fc1257ab95d1/d9fdc87db6daa8e3?show_docid=d9fdc87db6daa8e3</guid>
  <author>
  dancingbr...@gmail.com
  (db)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:13:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Just pulled down the Beta</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8fd2fc1257ab95d1/ca0328f9a1c4e1fc?show_docid=ca0328f9a1c4e1fc</link>
  <description>
  Like what I see so far but I hope they are late as I&#39;ve just found &lt;br&gt; there is no facility for international date formats ! &lt;br&gt; ie I tried to enter a date of when I first contacted a new prospect, &lt;br&gt; which for me was the 31st of January 2006, so here in the UK we would &lt;br&gt; enter this as 31.1.06. &lt;br&gt; It threw up an error message as it can&#39;t handle this format and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8fd2fc1257ab95d1/ca0328f9a1c4e1fc?show_docid=ca0328f9a1c4e1fc</guid>
  <author>
  john.rick...@mac.com
  (JR-London)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:32:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Just pulled down the Beta</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8fd2fc1257ab95d1/ae07199ff11ef1ec?show_docid=ae07199ff11ef1ec</link>
  <description>
  Hi JR, &lt;br&gt; We&#39;ll be curious to see what you think. In case you didn&#39;t see, the &lt;br&gt; final version is due today, but we all know how hat can go. Hopefully &lt;br&gt; we&#39;ll hear or see some news at least.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8fd2fc1257ab95d1/ae07199ff11ef1ec?show_docid=ae07199ff11ef1ec</guid>
  <author>
  dancingbr...@gmail.com
  (db)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:05:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Just pulled down the Beta</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8fd2fc1257ab95d1/9a712bf6d5159f3d?show_docid=9a712bf6d5159f3d</link>
  <description>
  Thanks for flaggign the application up. I&#39;ve never used this type or &lt;br&gt; app before but it could certainly be useful. Running a sales based &lt;br&gt; company I need to follow through on prospects I&#39;m trying to win and &lt;br&gt; keep a track on live jobs in. I do use JopPro which containes these &lt;br&gt; functions currently but there is no iCal or Address book link unless
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/8fd2fc1257ab95d1/9a712bf6d5159f3d?show_docid=9a712bf6d5159f3d</guid>
  <author>
  john.rick...@mac.com
  (JR-London)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:37:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Jumsoft releases Process 2.0 Beta 3 (cross post)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/24e1f377067ad2ae/bc2933700960683f?show_docid=bc2933700960683f</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.jumsoft.com/process/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; via MacMinute: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;This release fixes a critical iCal sync bug and other major bugs such &lt;br&gt; as undo/redo, sorting, document scrolling, unusual text styles, locked &lt;br&gt; projects, software update, pop-up columns, file saving and bugs with &lt;br&gt; sources. The final version of Process 2.0 is expected by the end of the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/24e1f377067ad2ae/bc2933700960683f?show_docid=bc2933700960683f</guid>
  <author>
  dancingbr...@gmail.com
  (db)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:57:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Welcome to ProcessTalk</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/bf3ac6db298222b8/1699f6301f324fcd?show_docid=1699f6301f324fcd</link>
  <description>
  Welcome to ProcessTalk, a place for open discussions regarding Process &lt;br&gt; by Jumsoft: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.jumsoft.com/process/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; This is started primarily because Jumsoft doesn&#39;t have a public forum, &lt;br&gt; and I personally think it is most useful to existing and potential &lt;br&gt; users to have an open forum where they can discuss any thing related to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/processtalk/browse_frm/thread/bf3ac6db298222b8/1699f6301f324fcd?show_docid=1699f6301f324fcd</guid>
  <author>
  dancingbr...@gmail.com
  (db)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:16:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
