<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>postscriptbarcode Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode</link>
  <description>Barcode Writer in Pure Postscript, http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter, implements the printing of barcodes entirely in PostScript. Transforming of the input into a printout is performed by the printer, avoiding the need to re-implement barcode generation code if your language needs change.</description>
  <language>en-GB</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Generate an odd number&#39;s code128 barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/646f743fdcd06152?show_docid=646f743fdcd06152</link>
  <description>
  If Code128 is just able to code pair numbers, so why can AxelCodBar do &lt;br&gt; it ? &lt;br&gt; Have you got an idea about how I can bypass the problem ?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/646f743fdcd06152?show_docid=646f743fdcd06152</guid>
  <author>
  f...@free.fr
  (zzzer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:33:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [postscriptbarcode] Re: Generate an odd number&#39;s code128 barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/277188878d1a9f5e?show_docid=277188878d1a9f5e</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ve created an entry for this in the issue tracker which you can track here: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/postscriptbarcode/issues/detail?id=15&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/277188878d1a9f5e?show_docid=277188878d1a9f5e</guid>
  <author>
  t...@terryburton.co.uk
  (Terry Burton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:11:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Generate an odd number&#39;s code128 barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/cbc0d79a9f1c2312?show_docid=cbc0d79a9f1c2312</link>
  <description>
  That&#39;s what I don&#39;t want to do ^^ &lt;br&gt; I d&#39;want to code all into C mode...
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/cbc0d79a9f1c2312?show_docid=cbc0d79a9f1c2312</guid>
  <author>
  f...@free.fr
  (zzzer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:56:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [postscriptbarcode] Generate an odd number&#39;s code128 barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/cb4bd5a16fed36bb?show_docid=cb4bd5a16fed36bb</link>
  <description>
  &amp;lt;...snip...&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; or C mode ? &lt;br&gt; Hi, &lt;br&gt; The short answer is that you need to manually switch alphabets to &lt;br&gt; catch the final odd digit (or at least cater for this in your Ruby &lt;br&gt; application). I intend to write an efficient auto-encoder for Code128 &lt;br&gt; as soon as I have finished the auto-encoder for Aztec Code or maybe &lt;br&gt; even beforehand as the task should be reasonably simple.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/cb4bd5a16fed36bb?show_docid=cb4bd5a16fed36bb</guid>
  <author>
  t...@terryburton.co.uk
  (Terry Burton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:51:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Generate an odd number&#39;s code128 barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/1376ee60b2685add?show_docid=1376ee60b2685add</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;d like to generate a Code128C barcode from a non-pair number (11 &lt;br&gt; digits). &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;When I try it with RGhost_barcode, it doesn&#39;t work. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;But when I try it with AxelCodBar (downloadable here : &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.chambily.com/softs/barcode.zip&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;), it works fine ! &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Do you know how I can do with Rghost_barcode without changing the A, B
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/a3f040e0eb7e5ee5/1376ee60b2685add?show_docid=1376ee60b2685add</guid>
  <author>
  f...@free.fr
  (zzzer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:35:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [postscriptbarcode] aztec - readerinit</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/b8ba911486fafb53/dd51f40bc4baf7d1?show_docid=dd51f40bc4baf7d1</link>
  <description>
  Hi Robert, &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;readerinit&amp;quot; refers to a special class of Aztec Code symbol that is &lt;br&gt; used for programming compatible barcode scanners. The message content &lt;br&gt; is specific to the particular hardware that you are programming, the &lt;br&gt; purpose being that the data encoded in such symbols is used to update &lt;br&gt; the device&#39;s scanning parameters and would not normally be presented
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/b8ba911486fafb53/dd51f40bc4baf7d1?show_docid=dd51f40bc4baf7d1</guid>
  <author>
  t...@terryburton.co.uk
  (Terry Burton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:50:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>aztec - readerinit</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/b8ba911486fafb53/fd30aeee1847111b?show_docid=fd30aeee1847111b</link>
  <description>
  Hi Terry &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I analyzed Your code in barcode.ps (aztec scrap) and I&#39;m not sure what &lt;br&gt; the readerinit means. &lt;br&gt; Can You explain this parameter in details (always &#39;false&#39; inYour &lt;br&gt; code) ? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;best regards &lt;br&gt; Robert &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;ps. I&#39;ve never seen postscript language before .. It&#39;s smart-funny &lt;br&gt; stack language. &lt;br&gt; My brain is my debugger :) I translated Your code (aztec scrap)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/b8ba911486fafb53/fd30aeee1847111b?show_docid=fd30aeee1847111b</guid>
  <author>
  rob...@preon.pl
  (preon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:41:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Error while executing gem install -y rghost_barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/8d31e6bfe76db904/42c7ff9a48900bed?show_docid=42c7ff9a48900bed</link>
  <description>
  The -p param doesn&#39;t work, so I&#39;ve downloaded the gem files and it&#39;s &lt;br&gt; now ok. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thanks ;)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/8d31e6bfe76db904/42c7ff9a48900bed?show_docid=42c7ff9a48900bed</guid>
  <author>
  f...@free.fr
  (zzzer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:48:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Onecode algorithm&#39;s performance</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/456d383bcfe1ad7d/d325c62224ab12cc?show_docid=d325c62224ab12cc</link>
  <description>
  Hi Terry, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yes, the latest release of BWIPP has a huge increase in performance &lt;br&gt; when dealing with the OneCode barcode! &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thanks! &lt;br&gt; Jean-François
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/456d383bcfe1ad7d/d325c62224ab12cc?show_docid=d325c62224ab12cc</guid>
  <author>
  coyoteg...@gmail.com
  (coyotegrin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:32:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [postscriptbarcode] Re: OneCode specification E</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/5654f93ddd2e5b7b/cc48fde62e30330b?show_docid=cc48fde62e30330b</link>
  <description>
  Hi Richard. &lt;br&gt; Glad to hear it. In my tests the VM&#39;s usertime dropped from 380ms to &lt;br&gt; 0ms (at a resolution of 10ms). The fix was one of those awkward &lt;br&gt; tradeoffs between (1) keeping the small but potentially costly table &lt;br&gt; generation algorithm for human significance or (2) embedding a large &lt;br&gt; and mysterious table of constants. In this case it was clearly better
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/5654f93ddd2e5b7b/cc48fde62e30330b?show_docid=cc48fde62e30330b</guid>
  <author>
  t...@terryburton.co.uk
  (Terry Burton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:18:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: OneCode specification E</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/5654f93ddd2e5b7b/6859e90af474373a?show_docid=6859e90af474373a</link>
  <description>
  Hi Terry, &lt;br&gt; The latest (2008-07-10) implementation of OneCode is *Much* faster - &lt;br&gt; thanks. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I made some changes as follows to the size of the OneCode barcodes:- &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; /height 0.150 def % Was /height 0.175 def &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;then:- &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; /bbs 65 array def &lt;br&gt; /bhs 65 array def &lt;br&gt; 0 1 64 { &lt;br&gt; /i exch def
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/5654f93ddd2e5b7b/6859e90af474373a?show_docid=6859e90af474373a</guid>
  <author>
  richard.mull...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:57:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [postscriptbarcode] Error while executing gem install -y rghost_barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/8d31e6bfe76db904/1f5b39b14b049683?show_docid=1f5b39b14b049683</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m sorry... change the work instalação(Portuguese) installation :) &lt;br&gt; On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Shairon Toledo &amp;lt;shairon.tol...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/8d31e6bfe76db904/1f5b39b14b049683?show_docid=1f5b39b14b049683</guid>
  <author>
  shairon.tol...@gmail.com
  (Shairon Toledo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:48:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [postscriptbarcode] Error while executing gem install -y rghost_barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/8d31e6bfe76db904/940f708d90fedd1b?show_docid=940f708d90fedd1b</link>
  <description>
  I think this issue isn&#39;t about barcodes, but &amp;quot;excuse me Terry I will answer &lt;br&gt; it&amp;quot; :) &lt;br&gt; You can fix the problem using the param -p to set proxy or get the gem files &lt;br&gt; and make the manual instalação .
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/8d31e6bfe76db904/940f708d90fedd1b?show_docid=940f708d90fedd1b</guid>
  <author>
  shairon.tol...@gmail.com
  (Shairon Toledo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:47:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Error while executing gem install -y rghost_barcode</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/8d31e6bfe76db904/ec692375bc322177?show_docid=ec692375bc322177</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve programmed a little RGhost_barcode. &lt;br&gt; On my PC (under Windows 2000), the installation of Ruby and its &lt;br&gt; plugins work very well. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I wanted to show it to my boss (under Windows XP), but when I execute &lt;br&gt; (on his PC) the command gem install -y rghost_barcode there&#39;s an &lt;br&gt; error : &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;ERROR: While executing gem ... (Gem::RemoteFetcher::FetchErro r)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/8d31e6bfe76db904/ec692375bc322177?show_docid=ec692375bc322177</guid>
  <author>
  f...@free.fr
  (zzzer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:58:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [postscriptbarcode] Onecode algorithm&#39;s performance</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/456d383bcfe1ad7d/57df8b2d6422c402?show_docid=57df8b2d6422c402</link>
  <description>
  &amp;lt;...snip...&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Hi Jean-François, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve just run some basic profiling on the encoder and (unsurprisingly) &lt;br&gt; I find that almost all of the processing time is spent in the two &lt;br&gt; routines that look like this: &lt;br&gt; --------8&amp;lt;-------- &lt;br&gt; % Conversion from codewords to characters &lt;br&gt; /tab513 1287 dict def &lt;br&gt; /lo 0 def
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/postscriptbarcode/browse_thread/thread/456d383bcfe1ad7d/57df8b2d6422c402?show_docid=57df8b2d6422c402</guid>
  <author>
  t...@terryburton.co.uk
  (Terry Burton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:15:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
