Yes, I have red that, but have no clue how to fix my problem. If I add minus signs inside the variable braces, then everything goes on single line, which is not good at all.
> Yes, I have red that, but have no clue how to fix my problem. If I add
> minus signs inside the variable braces, then everything goes on single
> line, which is not good at all.
Remember that without the "minus" trick, any whitespace is kept. In this case, it’s not the whitespace inside the macro definition but around the call.
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:02:43 PM UTC+3, Simon Sapin wrote:
> Le 23/10/2012 12:30, Jānis Ģeņģeris a écrit : > > Yes, I have red that, but have no clue how to fix my problem. If I add > > minus signs inside the variable braces, then everything goes on single > > line, which is not good at all.
> Remember that without the "minus" trick, any whitespace is kept. In this > case, it’s not the whitespace inside the macro definition but around the > call.
> I think, I'll give up on this, takes too much time ;>. Thanks.
> On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:02:43 PM UTC+3, Simon Sapin wrote:
>> Le 23/10/2012 12:30, Jānis Ģeņģeris a écrit : >> > Yes, I have red that, but have no clue how to fix my problem. If I add >> > minus signs inside the variable braces, then everything goes on single >> > line, which is not good at all.
>> Remember that without the "minus" trick, any whitespace is kept. In this >> case, it’s not the whitespace inside the macro definition but around the >> call.
