Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Why not use Twiml?

Received: by 10.180.20.199 with SMTP id p7mr46743wie.0.1334366506822;
        Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: plivo-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.92.193 with SMTP id co1ls67802wib.3.gmail; Fri, 13 Apr
 2012 18:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.86.227 with SMTP id s3mr43045wiz.2.1334366505701;
        Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.86.227 with SMTP id s3mr43044wiz.2.1334366505667;
        Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <dwil...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m10si144498wie.0.2012.04.13.18.21.45
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dwil...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.172;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dwil...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dwil...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by werb10 with SMTP id b10so2770428wer.3
        for <plivo-users@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=uV7CdRRjWGJCxYYUWpWbQifYoHJxhXGOuh3y9KZC3bA=;
        b=zE7OT8TySFcX9fAePgMUZjYe8B7CDYDqXuzYZ2wLQITc+hIWrAe+fvZDtcY7KyUxHb
         Aw17GfugeodnytBH7/VmA2x7r6DQWLlbbCJre4aG2ap2LALcLuPUHRGlGTSPXYAB/alo
         SGIPhKQP1UELJ+FR6sEOqtZZhn3Zyen8jPPz4t/xR0fR+3tzzzISs81mwfUE2w4t0uq2
         NffLIShOry0byRuMa+m9ByrengkTXX//sPxsg78DALsYJlrJK4mTpytrn9hSeEGsxtaZ
         1G4+Sjgx9wtDtoTw8I/wadBvllLCPUdR+fslFVeZpQN4CYzoohUOG6Y62asl5Bf4Nmn8
         X46w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.95.34 with SMTP id dh2mr697927wib.15.1334366505593; Fri,
 13 Apr 2012 18:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.123.206 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOEO=zS5nv7o+zDtO5Hu9Y2a3UW3H=21-=nhtfHzSRrS+7j...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <40e5ae84-082d-4369-ae4c-16145da54...@t8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com>
	<CAOEO=zS5nv7o+zDtO5Hu9Y2a3UW3H=21-=nhtfHzSRrS+7j...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:21:45 +0700
Message-ID: <CAP5o2MRPBf1tGmzi2Xammu=W7EJVmVLBcOju3h-ps_eR06n...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why not use Twiml?
From: David Wilkie <dwil...@gmail.com>
To: plivo-users@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444803590eab804bd99690b

--f46d0444803590eab804bd99690b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hey Venky,

Thanks for the explanation. I'm still deciding whether to switch to Plivo
or to Verboice (https://bitbucket.org/instedd/verboice/wiki/Home) which
uses Twiml and Asterisk/FreeSwitch. Both seem like cool projects

Dave

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Venky <ve...@plivo.com> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> We have not followed Twiml as a standard for a reason. Our APIs and XML
> allow for much more functionality which Twiml does not.
>
> So following some standard which does not cover the complete functionality
> as a benchmark would only let us do so much.
>
> However, one could build a twilm to RESTXML converter for those who want
> to make porting easier. Would love to see something like that.
>
> Regards
> Venky
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:27 PM, dave <dwil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just found out about Plivo, it looks awesome and am looking at using
>> it as an alternative to Twilio for my app. Just a question though, why
>> use Plivo RESTXML instead of Twiml? Using Twiml would make porting
>> applications that are already on Twilio so much easier. I understand
>> that there are now probably a number of applications written for Plivo
>> RESTXML so you would have to still support it but what would the
>> community think about the development of a gem which allows you to
>> write your apps in Twiml? E.g. similar to if you use the haml gem for
>> a rails app. If this would be a welcome addition I'll go ahead and
>> build a gem for Twiml support.
>>
>>
>

--f46d0444803590eab804bd99690b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey Venky,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for the explanation. I&#39;m still dec=
iding whether to switch to Plivo or to Verboice (<a href=3D"https://bitbuck=
et.org/instedd/verboice/wiki/Home">https://bitbucket.org/instedd/verboice/w=
iki/Home</a>) which uses Twiml and Asterisk/FreeSwitch. Both seem like cool=
 projects</div>
<div><br></div><div>Dave</div><div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, A=
pr 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Venky <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:venky=
@plivo.com">ve...@plivo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-l=
eft:1ex">
Hi Dave,<div><br></div><div>We have not followed Twiml as a standard for a =
reason. Our APIs and XML allow for much more functionality which Twiml does=
 not.</div><div><br></div><div>So following some standard which does not co=
ver the complete functionality as a benchmark would only let us do so much.=
</div>


<div><br></div><div>However, one could build a twilm to RESTXML converter f=
or those who want to make porting easier. Would love to see something like =
that.</div><div><br clear=3D"all">Regards<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=
=3D"#888888"><div>
Venky</div></font></span><div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:27 PM, dave <=
span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dwil...@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank"=
>dwil...@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">


I just found out about Plivo, it looks awesome and am looking at using<br>
it as an alternative to Twilio for my app. Just a question though, why<br>
use Plivo RESTXML instead of Twiml? Using Twiml would make porting<br>
applications that are already on Twilio so much easier. I understand<br>
that there are now probably a number of applications written for Plivo<br>
RESTXML so you would have to still support it but what would the<br>
community think about the development of a gem which allows you to<br>
write your apps in Twiml? E.g. similar to if you use the haml gem for<br>
a rails app. If this would be a welcome addition I&#39;ll go ahead and<br>
build a gem for Twiml support.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--f46d0444803590eab804bd99690b--