Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Are there good reasons for not choosing Play over Spring?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Stephane C  
View profile  
 More options Aug 1 2012, 8:48 am
From: Stephane C <stefatw...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 05:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Aug 1 2012 8:48 am
Subject: Re: Are there good reasons for not choosing Play over Spring?

Perhaps if you are targeting a servlet based web server, you may decide
that Spring MVC is more suitable...

On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 1:13:02 PM UTC+2, johanandren wrote:

> One reason could be that it is easier to find developers that has got
> experience with Spring. That could be pretty important as well if we are
> talking multi-year-multi-developer projects where there is a risk that the
> members of the team will be replaced over time. There is probably more
> books you can buy and read about Spring.

> I cannot se any obvious technical reasons for not choosing Play though,
> any library that is available to Spring is probably available as a
> standalone java library that can be used directly from a Play project.

> Also if we are talking about coding in Scala I'd certainly recommend Play
> over Spring.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.