Received: by 10.236.153.5 with SMTP id e5mr42554564yhk.5.1335991056309;
        Wed, 02 May 2012 13:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: pinta@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.121.65 with SMTP id q41ls1207716yhh.8.gmail; Wed, 02 May
 2012 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.180.28 with SMTP id h28mr12814337anp.24.1335991055828;
        Wed, 02 May 2012 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.180.28 with SMTP id h28mr12814336anp.24.1335991055812;
        Wed, 02 May 2012 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <cameronwhit...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yw0-f50.google.com (mail-yw0-f50.google.com [209.85.213.50])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z24si3060762yhh.1.2012.05.02.13.37.35
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 02 May 2012 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cameronwhit...@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.50;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cameronwhit...@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=cameronwhit...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-yw0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j63so1209705yhj.9
        for <pinta@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 02 May 2012 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=9sC36tK+wDP4B8+eEk7l3OnekEpK5NrorVSNJ7isTQI=;
        b=tSr3/JjhTcVNLoQ66G5BTBcT72H/TzTQKu+Pd3+QPSbkp4lSva1/kSgwNbzayUgmN1
         O4xTFvftLkq/LHC66HoRuDWZPeLQlCbmTZ23VlsKZFw9Gt+9QlT0r6clMup7HyvJpfza
         CkmFs6ZVjJTq3BCuTKBDgKjftSZ+q94JWvv8DtsTZ/wswKqy7wrCuNZWho9ysvxPeoiY
         9pF8FLnpJjMTNdu5zVZnD8h/od/99oNm+phZxu5XJFNEi2Cg9DTh3dXLY1pzMUPJTlHK
         EySgeC/v6bPQqTYci1ULeFHYoeJr5A6ClqM9SEJwjennBJOQwUzJoScfnQyvP8OL+xY4
         /5aA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.168.42 with SMTP id j30mr32322908yhl.25.1335991055566;
 Wed, 02 May 2012 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.146.206.10 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2012 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ef8e2a08-dd91-4913-b9d6-9b8db1d01...@r32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
References: <98917e17-14d7-4ca1-9c3b-58578c74c...@e15g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
	<3cea7b84-1b3f-4bee-ad97-e9c766ad7...@d20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
	<CADbC2cMgb+FhMuQ_o827QOzekqmhL=1atrk=23dA+xTpO_L...@mail.gmail.com>
	<ef8e2a08-dd91-4913-b9d6-9b8db1d01...@r32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:37:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CADbC2cPT9m9J+wpyPCf69htKj3k0dk0ijmZUVOKzoJxn2ON...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Layers and Images pads are not consistent when name is too large
 to fit into current window
From: Cameron White <cameronwhit...@gmail.com>
To: pinta@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

A bug report would be a good idea so that we don't lose track of this.

Cam

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:25 AM, IgorZ <igo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with 2a solution. Should I report a bug on bugtracker, that
> this info is not lost?