Actually, I didn't really intend for it to go up for a vote. :) When I
was going through the emails and pulling out the requested features I
saw it and thought it important enough to pull out and archive where
it was handy. :)
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Ben Ramsey <b...@benramsey.com> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 8:16 am, Matthew Turland <tobias...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 as well.
> Goodness, you people like to vote! :-)
> I don't think this was ever up for a vote to keep or change.
> Regardless, if it were up for vote, it wouldn't be up to this group to
> decide that. :-)
Ben Ramsey wrote: > Goodness, you people like to vote! :-)
> I don't think this was ever up for a vote to keep or change. > Regardless, if it were up for vote, it wouldn't be up to this group to > decide that. :-)
Well, then let me state it another way:
I have been and will continue to be supportive of that. ;)
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:35 AM, D. Keith Casey Jr. <ke...@caseysoftware.com>wrote:
> Ben Ramsey wrote: > > Goodness, you people like to vote! :-)
> > I don't think this was ever up for a vote to keep or change. > > Regardless, if it were up for vote, it wouldn't be up to this group to > > decide that. :-)
> Well, then let me state it another way:
> I have been and will continue to be supportive of that. ;)
+1 on not voting on the mission statement then. HA.
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:35 AM, D. Keith Casey Jr. <ke...@caseysoftware.com > > wrote:
> Ben Ramsey wrote: > > Goodness, you people like to vote! :-)
> > I don't think this was ever up for a vote to keep or change. > > Regardless, if it were up for vote, it wouldn't be up to this > group to > > decide that. :-)
> Well, then let me state it another way:
> I have been and will continue to be supportive of that. ;)
> +1 on not voting on the mission statement then. > HA.
> On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Elizabeth Naramore wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:35 AM, D. Keith Casey Jr.
>> <ke...@caseysoftware.com
>> > wrote:
>> Ben Ramsey wrote:
>> > Goodness, you people like to vote! :-)
>> > I don't think this was ever up for a vote to keep or change.
>> > Regardless, if it were up for vote, it wouldn't be up to this
>> group to
>> > decide that. :-)
>> Well, then let me state it another way:
>> I have been and will continue to be supportive of that. ;)
>> +1 on not voting on the mission statement then.
>> HA.