Paul: Each project only gets one vote, the project internally decided what
they vote.
David: He is the "community guy" at servergrove.org. Since each project only
gets one vote, the people who are members of the group won't change that. If
the person is notable and has a reputation worth voting on we should do it.
I say +1 to let him join the group, but he does not have any vote.
- Jon
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Paul M Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote:
You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or for
training, consulting, application development, or business related questions
at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
Sorry, but this is not a talk show, it's a technical working group. If he wants to follow the discussion, he can read the archives. If he wants to provide input on behalf of Symfony, he can do it through Fabien or you. That was the idea all along, and I don't see why we should change it now.
> Paul: Each project only gets one vote, the project internally > decided what they vote.
> David: He is the "community guy" at servergrove.org. Since each > project only gets one vote, the people who are members of the group > won't change that. If the person is notable and has a reputation > worth voting on we should do it.
> I say +1 to let him join the group, but he does not have any vote.
> - Jon
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Paul M Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2009, at 09:28 , David Zülke wrote:
> > Don't we already have Symfony representatives? (I googled his name > > and only Symfony came up)
> This raises a good question: who all on the list represents which > projects?
> Does each project need more than one or two representatives present?
> You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or > for training, consulting, application development, or business > related questions at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "PHP Standards Working Group" group. > To post to this group, send email to php-standards@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to php-standards+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/php-standards?hl=en > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> Sorry, but this is not a talk show, it's a technical working group. If he
> wants to follow the discussion, he can read the archives. If he wants to
> provide input on behalf of Symfony, he can do it through Fabien or you. That
> was the idea all along, and I don't see why we should change it now.
> On 04.11.2009, at 16:45, Jonathan Wage wrote:
> Paul: Each project only gets one vote, the project internally decided what
>> they vote.
>> David: He is the "community guy" at servergrove.org. Since each project
>> only gets one vote, the people who are members of the group won't change
>> that. If the person is notable and has a reputation worth voting on we
>> should do it.
>> I say +1 to let him join the group, but he does not have any vote.
>> - Jon
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Paul M Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> On Nov 4, 2009, at 09:28 , David Zülke wrote:
>> > Don't we already have Symfony representatives? (I googled his name
>> > and only Symfony came up)
>> This raises a good question: who all on the list represents which
>> projects?
>> Does each project need more than one or two representatives present?
>> You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or for
>> training, consulting, application development, or business related questions
>> at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
-- Jonathan H. Wage (+1 415 992 5468)
Open Source Software Developer & Evangelist
sensiolabs.com | jwage.com | doctrine-project.org | symfony-project.org
You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or for
training, consulting, application development, or business related questions
at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
So that everyone is on the same page (and for organizational / sanity
purposes), I've started a wiki page where we can list the member
projects and the representative(s) for each project.
I got lazy after 4 entries, please add yourselves.
Also, each project should denote (with a * next to the name, or
something) the person who is the designated to vote for the given
project. Finally, anyone not designated to vote, please don't clutter
up the list with +1 / -1 responses to things, it only makes tallying
more difficult / annoying.
> Paul: Each project only gets one vote, the project internally
> decided what they vote.
> David: He is the "community guy" at servergrove.org. Since each
> project only gets one vote, the people who are members of the group
> won't change that. If the person is notable and has a reputation
> worth voting on we should do it.
> I say +1 to let him join the group, but he does not have any vote.
> - Jon
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Paul M Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2009, at 09:28 , David Zülke wrote:
> > Don't we already have Symfony representatives? (I googled his name
> > and only Symfony came up)
> This raises a good question: who all on the list represents which
> projects?
> Does each project need more than one or two representatives present?
> You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or
> for training, consulting, application development, or business
> related questions at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
Also, with respect to ServerGrove, I'm gonna have to go with David on
this one.
Nothing personal, I just don't see the benefit. If somebody can
demonstrate that a representative of a hosting company has some
practical value to add to the discussion, I'd be happy to change my
vote.
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:48 AM, David Zülke <david.zue...@bitextender.com > > wrote:
> Sorry, but this is not a talk show, it's a technical working group.
> If he wants to follow the discussion, he can read the archives. If
> he wants to provide input on behalf of Symfony, he can do it through
> Fabien or you. That was the idea all along, and I don't see why we
> should change it now.
> On 04.11.2009, at 16:45, Jonathan Wage wrote:
> Paul: Each project only gets one vote, the project internally
> decided what they vote.
> David: He is the "community guy" at servergrove.org. Since each
> project only gets one vote, the people who are members of the group
> won't change that. If the person is notable and has a reputation
> worth voting on we should do it.
> I say +1 to let him join the group, but he does not have any vote.
> - Jon
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Paul M Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2009, at 09:28 , David Zülke wrote:
> > Don't we already have Symfony representatives? (I googled his name
> > and only Symfony came up)
> This raises a good question: who all on the list represents which
> projects?
> Does each project need more than one or two representatives present?
> You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or
> for training, consulting, application development, or business
> related questions at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
> -- > Jonathan H. Wage (+1 415 992 5468)
> Open Source Software Developer & Evangelist
> sensiolabs.com | jwage.com | doctrine-project.org | symfony- > project.org
> You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or
> for training, consulting, application development, or business
> related questions at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Nate Abele <nate.ab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So that everyone is on the same page (and for organizational / sanity
> purposes), I've started a wiki page where we can list the member projects
> and the representative(s) for each project.
> I got lazy after 4 entries, please add yourselves.
> Also, each project should denote (with a * next to the name, or something)
> the person who is the designated to vote for the given project. Finally,
> anyone *not *designated to vote, please don't clutter up the list with +1
> / -1 responses to things, it only makes tallying more difficult / annoying.
> Thanks,
> - Nate
> On Nov 4, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Jonathan Wage wrote:
> Paul: Each project only gets one vote, the project internally decided what
> they vote.
> David: He is the "community guy" at servergrove.org. Since each project
> only gets one vote, the people who are members of the group won't change
> that. If the person is notable and has a reputation worth voting on we
> should do it.
> I say +1 to let him join the group, but he does not have any vote.
> - Jon
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Paul M Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 4, 2009, at 09:28 , David Zülke wrote:
>> > Don't we already have Symfony representatives? (I googled his name
>> > and only Symfony came up)
>> This raises a good question: who all on the list represents which
>> projects?
>> Does each project need more than one or two representatives present?
> You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or for
> training, consulting, application development, or business related questions
> at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
-- Jonathan H. Wage (+1 415 992 5468)
Open Source Software Developer & Evangelist
sensiolabs.com | jwage.com | doctrine-project.org | symfony-project.org
You can contact Jonathan about Doctrine, Symfony and Open-Source or for
training, consulting, application development, or business related questions
at jonathan.w...@sensio.com
As said by others, I think each project should only have one vote (the lead developer/project manager of each project makes sense), but for bigger projects, I think it also makes sense to accept other core team members; people who are actually substantially to the project code.
As far as symfony is concerned, I think we already have enough people representing the project (except for Fabian who is also a big contributor to the project).
