Message from discussion
Photoblog Names/Titles...
Received: by 10.36.23.8 with SMTP id 8mr3611243nzw.1174354510541;
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <moev...@gmail.com>
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h49si22790nzf.2007.03.19.18.35.10;
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of moev...@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.239 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so1546536wxd
for <photoblogs@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=VivZdmOtZUN9A5hijWo25rQbUbU5ec1q/hW2gU+/CjKaaQ/emkSeb1eVT6gKia1v141pDpkOwj/qDcTySByXk9Bm2Zit24E8kK7v9cmbhChnVKeGI1XDtUH6/+/qnn7avaejT06EZbIMcVpMRmIhFaeRyHLVgdTSy9UGvYKIr6k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=CjyjLvolGg/etY3yihWEBdSRWJgsdUrDsyWpZrW1a/ug5VMi2q+p30ChSxHDbVbV4IcwirEBUpK11TZAX/qDfsC/XBO1UenooC6539SKzYgY23Rc3Byff1sXKC1z6FA8cf+gT0v8c3wstEXHBL1qDT5/4lLmz76r5GkvaVk2dk4=
Received: by 10.70.80.6 with SMTP id d6mr9740023wxb.1174354509609;
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.16.9 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <82b844190703191835q44b379c5k2a1553954a047bb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:35:09 -0500
From: "Aaron Molina" <moev...@gmail.com>
To: photoblogs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [photoblogs-discuss] Photoblog Names/Titles...
In-Reply-To: <1174352215.760372.278960@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_151738_16800977.1174354509360"
References: <1174352215.760372.278960@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
------=_Part_151738_16800977.1174354509360
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Tough thing to avoid with all the blogs out there and using some fairly
common camera descriptions for names of blogs... things will get clogged up
fast. You have already established DailySnap so don't go changing but
consider adding your name to it? Jess...@dailysnap.com? Beyond that I find
that most people don't find me by googling my photoblog name but by doing a
search for photographers in my area or with photoblogs.org. I have
Moeview.com just my nickname and my house has a nice view and it works well,
not many moeview's out there? Tough question... you want to stand out but
really should we be just using our names? Thats the way it used to be? Now
we can name ourselves what ever we want? Jessyel Ty Gonzalez Photography?
Wow thats professional? Whats the money roll in huh? Take care. Aaorn
Molina (www.moeview.com)
On 3/19/07, Jessyel Ty Gonzalez <jess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I was googling my own photoblog the other day (yes, I have no life)
> and noticed that there are six other photoblogs out there that share
> my site's name. I tried it with a few other sites I like, and noticed
> the same thing. I just want to know what others think about this -
> even if it's not affecting your site. Small, dumb question, but I was
> just amazed at the whole thing...
>
>
> >
>
--
MOEVIEW (photoblog)
http://www.moeview.com
MOEVIEW on FLICKR
http://www.flickr.com/people/moeview/
MOERADIO (my radio station)
http://www.moeview.com *click moeradio link*
------=_Part_151738_16800977.1174354509360
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Tough thing to avoid with all the blogs out there and using some fairly common camera descriptions for names of blogs... things will get clogged up fast. You have already established DailySnap so don't go changing but consider adding your name to it?
<a href="mailto:Jess...@dailysnap.com">Jess...@dailysnap.com</a>? Beyond that I find that most people don't find me by googling my photoblog name but by doing a search for photographers in my area or with <a href="http://photoblogs.org">
photoblogs.org</a>. I have <a href="http://Moeview.com">Moeview.com</a> just my nickname and my house has a nice view and it works well, not many moeview's out there? Tough question... you want to stand out but really should we be just using our names? Thats the way it used to be? Now we can name ourselves what ever we want? Jessyel Ty Gonzalez Photography? Wow thats professional? Whats the money roll in huh? Take care. Aaorn Molina (
<a href="http://www.moeview.com">www.moeview.com</a>)<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/19/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jessyel Ty Gonzalez</b> <<a href="mailto:jess...@gmail.com">jess...@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>I was googling my own photoblog the other day (yes, I have no life)<br>and noticed that there are six other photoblogs out there that share
<br>my site's name. I tried it with a few other sites I like, and noticed<br>the same thing. I just want to know what others think about this -<br>even if it's not affecting your site. Small, dumb question, but I was
<br>just amazed at the whole thing...<br><br><br></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>MOEVIEW (photoblog)<br><a href="http://www.moeview.com">http://www.moeview.com</a><br><br>MOEVIEW on FLICKR<br><a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/moeview/">http://www.flickr.com/people/moeview/
</a><br><br>MOERADIO (my radio station)<br><a href="http://www.moeview.com">http://www.moeview.com</a> *click moeradio link*
------=_Part_151738_16800977.1174354509360--