                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
From:  Jens <j...@look-s.de>
To:  Photoblogs <photoblogs@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Critical remarks about onexposure.net
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:43:47 -0700
Message-ID: <1181065427.856732.271010@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <498699F9-9B02-4040-B563-4DBEC3572C42@gmail.com>
References: <1181056798.226970.194220@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <BAY112-F262491E0E877040D9C4048BE200@phx.gbl>
   <1181063883.780434.154750@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <498699F9-9B02-4040-B563-4DBEC3572C42@gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ohhh....you found it Jacob....finally.

>>> About  "strange moderating actions in the forum":
> >>
> >>> * Like every serious forum, we remove posts being off-topic or of
> >>> low
> >>> value for the majority of the users. Jens posted some poor-written
> >>> nonconstructive critique in a place where it didn't belong, without
> >>> doing the most logic thing - bringing up his issues with the site
> >>> crew
> >>> first by e-mail. These posts were removed to keep the quality in the
> >>> forum.

Jacob this simply a lie. I told you more than once that my remarks on
that are concerning another member of OE at that time and I will not
mention his name here but maybe he will find this thread here by
himself.

By the way:

Isnt=B4t it true that Ralph used my name (besides others) in an
interview of a swedish newspaper to promote OE without asking anyone
if he is allowed to do this?
Isn=B4t it true that you displayed my photos at a domein which is called
nowords.nu without asking me to agree?
Isn=B4t it true that you established that membervote after my
registration and changed therefore the attitude of the site which
should be alone a reason to respect my multiple wish to withdraw?
Besides this:

>>> * It almost sounds like Jens didn't come to Onexposure for the give-
> >>> and-take experience. He came to be exposed. When we tried to be fair
> >>> against other members and rejected the photo that didn't meet our
> >>> requirements, he no longer had the control himself and our site was
> >>> not interesting anymore.

I think at that time I was one of the 30% who commented in the forum
as well as the pictures displayed. You can dry again to discredit
myself with your WRONG explanation that I left because of this one
photograph but in the end I did nothing here but telling the
truth....I cannot say this about your words.