Hey
I'm having trouble getting past the warning screen on the emulator which keeps telling me "Some content cannot be displayed due to Smartphone Security Settings".
As far as development here, we haven't really bothered to go down this road. I took a look at running Fennec on Windows Mobile, and I looked at Qt a bit, mostly because we would prefer to have a modern browser as opposed to Mobile IE 6.
That being said, tweaking for CSS and JS differences is slightly different than writing each app in its own completely different language. It'd be great if there was a .Net WebView that was based on WebKit that we could use, and if there was a way to get around the security warnings to allow the user to go straight into the app. I think those are my two huge wishlists when looking at Windows Mobile.
But yeah, it's a good proof of concept. I'm worried about the Javascript cruft that would appear having to develop for two different browsers, though.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Joe Bowser <bow...@gmail.com> wrote:Hey
I'm having trouble getting past the warning screen on the emulator which keeps telling me "Some content cannot be displayed due to Smartphone Security Settings".
What warning screen are you referring to? I'm not getting any. I'm using WM6 Standard SDK and 6.1 emulator images.
As far as development here, we haven't really bothered to go down this road. I took a look at running Fennec on Windows Mobile, and I looked at Qt a bit, mostly because we would prefer to have a modern browser as opposed to Mobile IE 6.
IE Mobile has been a pain but I thought it was the natural choice
That being said, tweaking for CSS and JS differences is slightly different than writing each app in its own completely different language. It'd be great if there was a .Net WebView that was based on WebKit that we could use, and if there was a way to get around the security warnings to allow the user to go straight into the app. I think those are my two huge wishlists when looking at Windows Mobile.
Yes, it will be difficult to achieve that the same app runs in BlackBerry and Windows Mobile but IMO the user will find way easier some tweaks here and there than learning Java or C#. I can't comment on the Webkit issue but I'm sure we can manage to remove the warnings in your environment if I'm not getting them here.
But yeah, it's a good proof of concept. I'm worried about the Javascript cruft that would appear having to develop for two different browsers, though.
Well, the BlackBerry code I sent last week suffers from this problem as well (it required the use of cookies). I'm not sure it's avoidable
And the real question is? Are you interested if I continue down this road and implement some of the APIs or do you have your own architecture and roadmap?
Great work Jose,
I had the same warnings on the emulator, but deploying it on my device
worked fine.
Like Joe said, fork off stable (http://github.com/sintaxi/phonegap)
> And the real question is? Are you interested if I continue down this road
> and implement some of the APIs or do you have your own architecture and
> roadmap?
and do the rest of what he says.
Let me know when you have done so, and I can coordinate my
contributions with you to the WinMo code.
Currently we don't have any usable code yet, just my experimental
stuff getting WebKit into WinMo, and creating an activex control to
bridge between Javascript and native code. However, once Windows
Mobile 6.5 is released it will be interesting how their Widgets API
will fit in with PhoneGap. For now integrating with IE is the fastest
way currently for PhoneGap support, especially since the Windows
Mobile MarketPlace is launching this summer.
A few suggestions: I would suggest to keep to the "gap://action/
[arguments]" URL scheme for WinMo like the iPhone code unlike what you
have in the PoC,
and also I would change Command.accept(string instruction) to not need
to test for instructions with a leading slash (ie remove the slash).
Shaz