REPRODUCTION Consider the concept of supply and demand; as applied to
human beings. If there is a shortage of humans, then they will have a
higher value and will be treated better. But if there is a surplus of
humans, then their value will be low, and they will be treated poorly,
according to their low value according to supply and demand. So that
when women are considering how many humans to produce in terms of how
large a family to have; collectively, they have quite an impact on how
we all are treated by those economic forces that rule over us all. And
then there is the conservative, religious rules over our sexuality.
But first let us consider sexual reproduction in itself. Sexual
reproduction produces offspring that are not exact copies of their
parents, but who are different from their parents to some degree. So,
sexual reproduction generates differences between each of us. Now, if
we were all to have sex with each other in unrestricted sexual
reproduction, then those differences would be spread all back among
our population and we would not build on or accentuate those
differences. But that’s not the way sexual reproduction works in our
world. Sexual reproduction is restricted to one man one woman and to
form a family grouping to raise the offspring produced. People of like
interests and skills tend to hand around with each other; and that is
where they are likely to meet a mate. So that the differences
generated by sexual reproduction are preserved and compounded over
each successive generation; so that different groups of people are
developed each being good in one particular area, while not so good in
the other areas. So that as individuals they cannot function well, but
only as a group can they work together to combine their good areas to
make a complete and competent societal whole. Thus the rulers of a
society have at their beck and call, all the humans of the society to
do their bidding, because as individuals they are all unbalanced in
their skills, incapable of being self sufficient as individuals, who
can only survive and excel by joining as a group each to contribute
their best skill. So that what the conservative rules over our sexual
reproduction do is to breed individuals who are slaves who are easily
molded by the rulers of a society, who are incapable of much
independence as individuals, so that we are more so a commodity to be
used by those who rule over us. Human sexuality doesn’t stop, but
continues to generate differences in the offspring; and with the
conservative rules remaining in place, this results in ever increasing
specialization in an individual’s best skill area, while the rest of
the individual’s areas lag further and further behind; so that
individuals become more and more unbalanced so that eventually the
individual becomes a commodity (which is their best skill), and is not
so much alive anymore in any of the other areas; as generation after
generation of sexual reproduction under conservative rule progresses.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIn a world where the force of destruction is a
problem, we shall see that being at medium ability, not at barren,
neither rich ability; is the solution. Concerning the unbalanced
individual; being at barren ability in all the other areas, is not
good; and the other areas, although lagging behind, need to be
advanced too, eventually; otherwise it doesn’t work out. However,
outside the considerations of dealing with destruction; what is the
best configuration to have, concerning the societal entity (which is
made up of the best skills of each individual); and also concerning
the individual entity? The societal entity, and the individual entity,
are both areas (of value) that can be grown into and improved. To
leave a vacuum in any one of these areas, represents an improvement
that can be made and grown into. To act so that either of these areas
is to be sacrificed, is destructive, and is against the directives of
growth/goodness and love, which God purportedly is. Also there is the
consideration of coordination. As unbalance progresses in the
individual, the individual looses sight of where its best skill fits
into the other societal areas, as its own ’other areas’ are so feeble.
Eventually the societal entity becomes the individual, as the
individual entity no longer exists. What was the individual entity, is
now like cells of the body -incapable of any life or action outside
the body -there is no longer any intelligent life at this level. The
result of all this, is the causation of a rich area (the societal
entity); and a barren area (the individual entity); from what used to
be a medium ability situation. What has occurred is a polarization to
absolutes, by using sexual reproduction and conservative rules over
sexual reproduction; over the generations. Note that neither of these
absolutes is capable of dealing with the problem and force of
destruction; whereas the medium ability environment is. And since we
live in a world still with the problem of destruction, we will need to
bring back these medium ability environments. And this means we at
some point need to interrupt this conservative breeding program that
has been cornering the effects of human sexuality; and violate it.
Otherwise we will be in hell. (// Note that to actually obey the
command to die to yourself for Christ's sake; that when you take into
and part of yourself (so that it becomes part of yourself), this
action to die to yourself; that you must also die to this dieing to
yourself; so that an incomplete dying to yourself actually results;
which provides the medium environment needed, not these absolute
polarizations.//) The religious exhortations to be like a seed and die
to yourself so you can be part of the great big religion in the sky;
so that you can be part of the body: an arm, a leg, an eye or an ear
or a hand maybe; so that you can die to yourself and be one(in the
(societal)body): are all leading you down the wrong path; it seems to
me. Because the appeal of Jesus Christ, and need that he fulfills, as
being part of humanity; as being in between the absolutes of highness
and lowness, representing humanity and the in between: is not found
here. And the creation of a barren area in what used to be the
individual entity, is against the directives of growth and love. Now,
in response to a totally evil environment, this would be a good
response. But life is no longer so much so. Yet the controls are set
on autopilot in this direction, and need to be changed. A little bit
of this unbalance is OK, because it causes the individual entity to
also share with the societal entity, so that both entities can exist
and grow. But too much unbalance forces the individual entity to death
so that only the societal entity remains. But then I am reminded of
the idea that if high good ways exist, we as individuals should seek
to give up our individual ways, because individual ways are fraught
with more destruction and are not as good as the higher ways (of a
societal entity). But wait a minute: this is not that situation. The
directive to bring the individual entity to nothing as a means of
solving the imperfections of the individual entity/position; is a
different solution than the solution of having a robust individual
entity lay aside its ways and let the societal ways fill its needs
(with the medium level Jesus Christ entity as facilitator); because in
this solution, both the societal entity and the individual entity
EXIST and are well grown into. (Not all of the individual’s actions
are defective; some are wholly good and evil free.) Now then, not all
evils are based on need. The ones that are, are eliminated by both
these solutions, dealing with the neediness of the individual
position. But other evils that pop up, well, if there is no individual
position, then they must be dealt with by the only remaining position -
the high and rich societal position. And as we shall see, when an evil
is put into a rich environment, a firestorm results and the whole
thing is burnt down. Better to let evils be worked out in the
individual position, so that the societal position, (which is made of
the best parts of the individuals collectively and is very rich) can
know how to avoid these evils, having learned from its individuals.
Once again, I reiterate: we are screwing ourselves if we continue down
this path to death of the individual entity through conservative
running of our sexual reproduction! Get off your ass and fuck
different people (while trying to avoid a venereal disease, which is
the weakness of this directive). And have some, but not too many kids
from this. Otherwise, if you insist on being good and morally,
sexually conservative; you along with the rest of your kind will be
the cause of the end of the world scenarios that religious
fundamentalists predict.  Because when hatreds are worked out on the
individual levels, it is with guns and knives and clubs. But when
there is no more individual level, and there are still hatreds to be
worked out; the societal entities work these out with atom bombs.  And
who wants to be responsible for blowing up the whole world?  Who is
the biggest terrorist now?  Why it is the conservative
fundamentalists.  So, in the war on terror, we ask you to loosen your
morals a little.
GOOD VS EVIL:
 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Let us Consider
that goodness, growth, and being kind to one another, is a superior
force over the force of destruction, death, decay, and being mean to
each other. (To do this, we consider all possibilities) -Considering
what’d happen if in a universe with only the force of goodness-and-
growth: -If in a universe where only the force of death/destruction
existed: -Or if we were in a universe with both forces. Here on earth
we’re in the situation where both forces exist. But that doesn’t mean
this is the only way, -that other situations aren’t possible.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Let’s
consider a universe of only the force of destruction and death. As
death /destruction progress, they take whatever is alive, and kill it,
so that where life once was, now exists (is produced) nothing and
nothingness. Ashes to ashes, and dust to dust. Pretty soon, life
becomes in scarce supply, while a whole lot of empty space and
inanimate material is left behind. After awhile, all the life is
killed, and then what? With no life left to kill, the force of
destruction comes to a stop (no more destroying can be done), because
from nothing, this force can go no further from there. Here is a
definite bottom to the universe.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Now consider
the force of good-and-growth as being the only force around. As this
force acts, it takes nothingness/lifeless matter (dust), and creates
life in its place. Soon everything starts to come alive. Pretty soon
we begin to run out of improvements to make. Emptiness and undeveloped
raw material (dust) starts to come into short supply. If everything is
alive, then no more growth can be done, and thus the force of good is
stopped, right? Well, there’s not so much an absolute ceiling, as
there is an absolute bottom. You see, life forms can advance/be
advanced and become ever more capable and alive; and this thus
continues the force of good. And, a universe that is alive (full of
life), is very capable -able to do lots of things, (unlike a barren
universe consisting of nothingness). And with that life/capability, it
can bridge barriers and reach raw material (dust) that had previously
been separated from it by a barrier. Hence, the force of goodness and
growth can survive by itself much better than the force of destruction/
death can. This is an advantage: -When the force of destruction  can
be escaped from; (the good separated from the destructive); that which
is destructive, when alone, burns itself out, finds itself boxed in by
barriers, and ceases to exist; Whereas the good alone, survives,
bridges barriers, and continues to grow. Of course when both forces
are around, the force of good generates life for the force of
destruction to feed on and destroy as it survives. (and the force of
death/decay generates voids, which the force of good uses as its
starting material.) This is the way things are here on earth. And both
the forces of; good, and destruction, have an easy time finding
material to work with (compared to if they were alone).
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ALSO, it takes life-and-
capability to do or be either the force of good-and-growth, or the
force of destruction. The lack of life can’t do/be either force. Since
what the force of good produces is life, such life can continue to do
forces. But since what the force of destruction produces is death and
nothingness and voids in life; since this cannot do or support either
force, then the force of destruction alone is destined to a quick end
while the force of good and growth alone is destined to continue.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ALSO,
since only life can do-be either force: When destruction experiences
what it produces, or is applied to itself, it doesn’t grow, but
instead shrinks to nothing. xxxxxxxxxx But when goodness experiences
what it produces, (when goodness is good to itself) it does not die,
but instead, grows. So, the force of destruction needs something other
than just itself to exist (is a parasitic force), while the force of
good does not and is self sufficient with just itself. So that when
alone, good survives while destruction self eliminates and vanishes.
From this we can see that good and growth, is a superior force to the
force of death and destruction.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzz
Let us consider some situations, while keeping in mind these truths: -
that it takes life and ability to do/be either goodness, or
destruction (and that lack-of-life is unable to cause either of these
forces); Inputs and outputs: -that the force of destruction takes in
that which is alive as its input/raw material; and produces voids-in-
life and inanimate material as its output, as what it produces. -That
the force of goodness/growth takes in voids-in-life and inanimate
material, as its input/raw material; and produces -life- as its output
and what it produces.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx With these
concepts in mind let’s consider the situation of the force of
destruction in a rich environment. Not only does this force have
plenty of its raw material or input (life), present here in the rich
environment; -destruction also has what supports what either force is
made of (which is also, life). Thus here the force of death-and-
destruction can grow rapidly and become quite large here, in a rich
environment.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzz
(In this tangent, please consider that since enforcing rules over the
gray areas of living life causes a patchwork of rich and barren
environments: my question is, why do we scrap together these rich
environments where there is the force of destruction nearby -(as
destruction is inescapably a part of all gray actions at our level of
ability)? This will just result in successive firestorms where the
gray actions’ destructiveness burns down the rich parts of the
patchwork. All this does is feed evil/destructiveness. As for myself,
I do not wish to succor and feed the force of destructiveness. End
tangent.) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Here is another important tangent: Here on earth, we live with what
is destructive and also that which is good and growing. In this
respect, we often do actions which contain both goodness and growth
and also destructiveness in the same action. These actions I would
term ‘human actions’ (also referred to as ‘gray actions’ ). These
human areas are hopelessly a mixture of both goodness and destruction
(at our level of ability we‘re unable to separate the forces), and
there is no purity of action in them, as they contain both goodness as
well as destructiveness inescapably intertwined in the same action.
These mainly center around human hungers and needs. So that whether or
not a human action is done, partially done, or refrained from; some
destruction is always present, just in different areas. Like when we
eat, this is good for our survival, but at the same time, destructive
to some other life form’s survival as a plant or animal had to die to
provide this. And if we don’t eat, this is good for the surrounding
plants and animal’s survival, but destructive to us as we starve.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx However, in our human world,
not all actions are these ‘human’ or ‘gray’ actions. Some actions CAN
be divided up completely (or much more so), into all good vs. all
destructive parts. And it is here, with these non human areas, there
can exist a purity of action as is not seen in the human actions.
Areas of all-good exist, as well as do areas that are all destructive,
exist. However, when areas of purely all destructive exist, they soon
self consume and disappear. So that only the areas of all-good exist
with such a purity of action. Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Still, if that which is all-destructive can find a human action to
join with, it can feed off the good in the human action, and it won’t
have to self consume. -(It can continue to exist and not disappear.)
So, when the all-good casts off the all-destructive: -to achieve
purity of action; the all destructive actions become as ravening
wolves seeking to prey upon human actions, feeding off the good in
human actions, so that they can survive and won’t self consume/die.
And who is going to save a human action from being preyed upon by
these all destructive actions? It is true that the all destructive
action can be separated away from the human action, unlike the
destructiveness within the human action that is part of the human
action; but who is going to do it? The all destructive action is
desperate, as its life depends on preying on a human action, and so
has apparently overpowered the human action. An all-good action might
intervene and separate an all-destructive action from a human action;
but if it did so it would spoil its purity of action and it would no
longer be an all-good action. So that all-good actions are reluctant
to intervene to separate an all-destructive action from its prey human
action, as they loose their purity of action in doing so. So it would
seem the all destructive actions (although since they've mixed with
the human actions, are no longer purely all destructive), have found a
way of survival and a continued food source by preying on the human
actions and human hunger satisfying; thus making the human world more
towards the destructive side; towards barrenness (which preserves the
togetherness of the good and destructive within that human action, as
we‘ll see later). Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx However, what about
this plan: What if the all-good actions split a small part of
themselves off to come and deal with this situation, while leaving
their major part of themselves behind, still separate and still
maintaining their purity of action. (The smaller part that split off
would loose its purity of action through it’s intervening.) The
smaller part that split off would come and separate the all-
destructive part from the human part so that the all destructive part
would finally self consume and die; leaving the human action no longer
preyed upon by the all destructive action; so that it tended not
towards barrenness, but towards medium ability. Thus evil/destruction
would be lessened and much eliminated by this plan.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Now, in the human areas; when the smaller, split off, all good part is
generating/creating something (to medium ability), in the vacuums
(where there is nothing and barrenness) caused by destruction, even
the destruction of rules over human areas,(and even the destructions
that are part of the human actions themselves): it is wise for this
split off part to limit its exposure to only the human part it is
presently creating/generating, and not the rest of that human area;
even if this generated material is eventually for the rest of that
human area. This is because this smaller, split off, all good part can
limit the loss of purity and exposure to destruction, to just what is
in the human part it is generating. Once it is done creating a piece
of this material, it can then withdraw itself and then allow the rest
of the human area to have possession/use of it. So that the split off
all good parts of us can act to generate material in isolation, and
then shortly, to also act to release pieces of that material away from
itself and this isolation, unto the rest of this human area. In these
coordinated set of actions that build parts of human actions/things;
once a certain part has reached medium ability, this part is no longer
generated in isolation, but other parts are, as the split off all good
does move onto these other parts that are in need of being brought
from nothingness to medium level. The parts at medium level that are
no longer being generated, are still participants in the rest of this
human area, and do receive what is released from isolation; its just
that they do not keep on being generated; so that they do not move
then from medium level to high ability, (as a result of this
generating in isolation and then release).
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Note that even if, for the
sake of argument say, it turns out that Christianity is a fraud and
that Jesus wasn’t anybody special: note that the structures of
Christianity still exist in our human world and in our universe and
within us, anyway; as some areas are more easily all good vs all
destructive, while other areas have the destructive and the good
hopelessly intertwined in the same action.
Where does Jesus fit in?  If we take the Biblical account, Jesus was
from God, and is therefore rich.  But Jesus also received God's
punishment for our sins, unto death.  But he survived it as he was
resurrected. So we can't say he is as high as God because he also
recieved God sized punishment.  But we can't say he represents the low
point either, because being of God, he survived the punishment and was
resurected.  Somewhere in between the high and the lowest points, I
would say.  Here we see an entity often in between the highness of
God, and the lowness of death and nothingness or hell: -who
longstandingly represents humanity and the in between; better than any
other mortal human ever could.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It is our (smaller split off part
from our all good areas) that then acts to separate destructive parts
away from human areas that can be separated away, and to fill vacuums
in the human areas to medium ability; and not our main high all good
parts which are separate and kept away from the human area. So that if
we are waiting for God almighty to step in and do this. No. It is the
meek and smaller Jesus representations that are here with us in the
human area, that do this
instead.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Then there
are the times when our smaller split off part is in a lull, where not
much is going on in the generating of human/gray area parts. It then
may turn its attention on generating all good parts, to the best that
it is able. (Those all good parts are more pure and more all
encompassing of every good thing than it is). As the all good is
generated, it is generated as also devoting a part of its new self to
also generating new all good parts, so that eventually, the smaller
split off part has to bear less of the load of generating all good
parts. But then, all of a sudden, the lull is over, and new action in
the human/gray area appears that is needed. It is the purpose and
function of the smaller split off part to deal with the imperfect
human gray area, not the all good area. In this imperfect, impure, and
non absolute area of the human/gray areas; there is one absolute: and
that is when a new, lull breaking human need appears, the smaller
split off part (which had been distracted into generating the all
good), then removes all (not just part, all) of the young all good
material that is destined for all good, but which had not matured into
that yet, away from the human area and human generating; to the best
of its ability. -However, it must share this directive with also, in a
reasonable time frame, to generate in the human needs area. -Just that
this smaller split off part itself, doesn't at all mix the new
generating of human needs, with its distraction generating of the all
good, especially the immature all good that just happens to be caught
when the lull is broken. -It ejects this away from itself before
beginning the lull breaking human need generating. Xxxxx Note that the
newly generated mature all good can break a small part of itself off
to be its contribution to the smaller split off part, and thus add
material to help this situation here.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In this insert, we see that in contrast to our stagnant universe that
doesn’t grow well; that in an all-good universe with lots of growth,
no one is left behind, but are all advanced to high levels, in good
time. (Note: FogoHC means Force of good of High Capability. )When the
joint venture of GROWTH and gripping, does growth and gripping on
itself; there's a circular feedback created that produces tremendous
quantities of growth. When forces of good are producing capability;
they can either produce new forces-of-good; or new neutral-capability.
Forces of good are made of capability. And for one force of good to
produce a second force of good; is a force of good producing a force
of good. A force of good can also be a force of good, by producing
neutral capabilities. There are great advantages for forces of good to
produce more forces of good, as opposed to neutral capability. For one
thing, the newly created force of good can in turn produce force of
good of its own; and an exponential increase in the production of the
force of good will result. Whereas, with the increase of neutral
capability, only a flat rate of capability increase is achieved, and
no new force of good is produced. For another thing, the forces of
good are protected by the fogoHC, while neutral capability is not.
Thus forces-of-good producing forces of good, is more advantageous
than forces of good producing neutral capability. However, before
something can be a force of good, it usually has to have some minimum
level of capability. Like, it might help if something were alive, so
it could reproduce itself; or that it be intelligent, so it could rise
above random action, which produces decrease(destruction) as well as
increase(growth). Thus even though the forces of good may want to
increase force-of-good capability right away, they have to go through
an increase of neutral capabilities to reach a minimum level, before
forces of good can start increasing forces of good. (And, a neutral
capability cannot be gripped before it exists/-before it is produced.
›But when it is produced/created; who says it has to be a separate
entity from the fogoHC? Isn't the fogoHC in contact with it to create
it? Yet this is not necessarily so, if only a f.o.g. (especially if
not together with the fogoHC), creates it.›) When a force of good that
is able to do gripping- (that is, a fogoHC), comes in contact
(together) with neutral-capability produced by forces of good; that
neutral-capability becomes a part of the fogoHC, and is thus
protected. We see a picture of the fogoHC going about gripping forces
of good and gripping the neutral capability that all forces of good
initially produce. With more neutral capability being produced; those
forces of good who can do gripping (that is forces ogoHC), have more
neutral capability to grip, and thus turn into force of good
capability. As we can see, there is always more and more neutral
capability (to grip) that is being produced. But where does the
capability go after it has been gripped and is a marginal force of
good? Well, there are 2 possibilities: A) it goes no further and
serves to produce neutral capability for the fogoHC. it remains at
about its original level of capability and fails to advance: being
frozen at some level of advancement so that it is useful to the
fogoHC, but that it advances no further. or possibility B.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx B) it could advance in its abilities to first become
alive; then advance in intelligence; and finally become a fogoHC. it
continues to advance and eventually becomes a fogoHC itself. With
possibility A, more and more neutral capability is produced. The
amount of it increases exponentially. But the fogoHC becomes no
larger. There is no growth in the fogoHC because no lower capabilities
are allowed to become fogoHC. For the fogoHC to produce more of
itself, it can replicate itself. But this is taking lower forces of
good and advancing them to be a fogoHC. This is not example B, so the
fogoHC doesn't do this. It finds itself with an ever growing supply of
neutral capability to make contact with. It might get swamped by the
size of it. It needs to grow in size to match the growth of the
neutral capability. It could try and make itself more powerful and
become of higher capability within itself. But whether it could do
this or not is uncertain; whereas the creation of itself has been
proven possible by its own existence. The fogoHC must increase its own
power at an exponential rate just to keep up with the neutral
capability. But this is unlikely as the fogoHC would be increasingly
more busy trying to handle the exponential growth of the neutral
capability, that it would have less and less time to work on its own
advancement. Also, it is into uncharted areas, as it has never been
that powerful before. It is a driven and desperate fogoHC, that is
forced to keep up a growth output and is driven by growth needs, if it
can keep up at all. In this picture of a universe, it is easy to see
how a fogoHC could become overextended and how the marginal force of
good and neutral capability could overgrow a fogoHC, and eventually
become unmanageable. It could cease contacting the neutral capability,
but that would make it vulnerable to evil. Thus the force of evil
would step in and stagnation would result after some point of
expansion. Possibility B: Now let's observe a universe where the basic
forces of good produced, do advance to finally become a fogoHC. With
possibility B, there would be more and more fogoHC to keep up with the
more and more neutral capability being produced. There would be no
problem of the fogoHC getting swamped. Here, the contacting of the
ever-growing neutral capability is provided by a fogoHC that is also
growing exponentially. Also, the fogoHC isn't forced to grow in
uncharted areas; only in the replication of more of itself, which by
its existence, has already been proven possible to do. So it's very
probable that not only does the fogoHC contact neutral capabilities
and turn them into marginal force of good capability; the fogoHC also
advances these marginal-good capabilities to be very intelligent,
capable, alive; and finally to be forces ogoHC. (Growth plus
advancement.) End important inserts)
Go to http://www.geocities.com/feelosofree/ok.html