Received: by 10.224.220.12 with SMTP id hw12mr3894861qab.8.1350110166149;
        Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: pgxn-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.146.194 with SMTP id i2ls7162352qav.6.gmail; Fri, 12 Oct
 2012 23:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.223.14 with SMTP id ii14mr3902162qab.3.1350110165840;
        Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.223.14 with SMTP id ii14mr3902161qab.3.1350110165832;
        Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <da...@justatheory.com>
Received: from smtp.pobox.com (b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com. [208.72.237.35])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id ba11si1880199qcb.2.2012.10.12.23.36.05;
        Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 208.72.237.35 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of da...@justatheory.com) client-ip=208.72.237.35;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 208.72.237.35 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of da...@justatheory.com) smtp.mail=da...@justatheory.com; dkim=pass header...@pobox.com
Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B946769A;
	Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:36:05 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=content-type
	:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=sasl; bh=
	2KpEQT01fPSAnX8rdptGkyFDo48=; b=g7pu8pncd1HTnDKmqjecHV526jFQBEeD
	KRqFJt8yvk3xjO4IWo95a5e49PaZo2Z2FasEPHUgM+L5x53wEISotiCCthdcgWvV
	L23mPNfhMwze7K5T6k2yLt8/PlN7eQza91NQsmUROBtXesGb9Xznl+EtS/DJl9Ya
	K/wrb+WeFIs=
Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8967699;
	Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:36:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (unknown [50.137.40.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher
 AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
 b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 085117698; Sat, 13 Oct 2012
 02:36:03 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: Semver and prerelease
From: "David E. Wheeler" <da...@justatheory.com>
In-Reply-To: <4911176.sXsOo8QR65@ropc>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:36:02 -0700
Cc: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varra...@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <636C37FE-6936-4C62-A569-C022ED805...@justatheory.com>
References: <1b128157-6168-413e-8605-187568afbaf0@googlegroups.com>
 <507566C7.8030...@freedomcircle.com>
 <CA+mi_8avw_6Y4yM6KpM920SxbkHkeSxvo7ScGcRsuqET+Q9...@mail.gmail.com>
 <4911176.sXsOo8QR65@ropc>
To: pgxn-users@googlegroups.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 42F5CEFA-1500-11E2-B5B9-BB652E706CDE-76319746!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com

On Oct 10, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Ronan Dunklau <rdunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I understand the problem, and would just like to know: is PGXN likely =
to=20
> change its "prerelease" versioning scheme ? Or can I confidently =
release a=20
> 1.0.0beta and finally get over it ?

If we change the scheme, it will be backwards compatible. So yes, you =
can release that confidently. :-)

> I actually don't care at all, I just want to release a beta, and this =
proves=20
> to be more difficult than expected.

Only because the semver format changed under us. Irritating.

David