The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: perl.perl6.language
From: s...@payrard.net (Stéphane Payrard)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 01:07:18 +0200
Local: Thurs, Sep 18 2003 7:07 pm
Subject: Re: Next Apocalypse
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 02:12:31PM -0700, chromatic wrote: With Perl6, few people will compile whole librairies but most > On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 12:33 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >Ah, shouldn't optimization be automatic? Much preferrable to provide > No. That's why I tend to opt-out of writing in C and opt-in to writing > Perl (all versions) and Parrot are built around the assumption that will load bytecode. At this late stage there is little place for tunable optimization except JITting or it would defeat the sharing of such code between different intances of Perl6. Nothing will preclude to dynamically extend classes. I note that in Perl6 many optimizations were autoloading for deferring compilation of material until it's really needed. With bytecode, it makes sense (at least optimization-wise) that the programmer decides if his classes will be sealed or some methods to be final because at the user level it is too late to decide. -- > -- c You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||