Newsgroups: perl.perl6.language
From: gregory.p.kee...@lmco.com (Gregory P. Keeney)
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:53:52 -0700
Local: Fri, Sep 3 2004 11:53 am
Subject: Re: Synopsis 9 draft 1
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: I think 'shape' fits better than 'cardinal' or 'dimension'; these things > Maybe it's just my BASIC upbringing, but "shape" doesn't seem like the > right word. Words like "dimension" and "cardinal" fit better in my > But "shape" makes me want to do something like this: > my num @a is shape('triangle'); > That might make sense for triangles, but not the others (unless have a 'dimension' that is distinct from their shape (e.g., C<my int @a is shape(3;4;5);> has three dimensions). 'shape' implies the topology of the array; though I can see how it would be easy to assume 'shape' means 'polygon'. Think of it more like "the shape of ships, the shape of ships, the shape Forgive me if I come across pedantic; I'm just trying to provide some Gregory Keeney > Anyway ...my two cents. If "shape" is carved in stone, I'll live with See, a stone has another shape! <grin> > it :) You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||