apo/A06.pod: spelling error(s)?

[Steven Philip Schubiger]

In
macro circumfix:(*...*) () is parsed(/.*?/ { "" }

is the second enclosing part of the "parsed" parentheses omitted
by intention? If not, I'd volunteer to provide a patch.

Steven

[Luke Palmer]

Fixed. Thanks.

Luke

[Steven Philip Schubiger]

On 20 Apr, Luke Palmer wrote:

You missed some.

Steven

--- perl6/doc/trunk/design/apo/A06.pod Wed Apr 20 20:03:19 2005
+++ perl6/doc/trunk/design/apo/A06.pod Wed Apr 20 20:05:32 2005
@@ -3004,12 +3004,12 @@
interpolated with a special C< ... > marker, which is considered part
of the name:

- macro circumfix:(*...*) () is parsed(/.*?/ { "" }
+ macro circumfix:(*...*) () is parsed(/.*?/) { "" }

[Update: That's now solved by use of existing slice syntax:

- macro circumfix:<(* *)> () is parsed(/.*?/ { "" }
- macro circumfix:{'(*', '*)'} () is parsed(/.*?/ { "" }
+ macro circumfix:<(* *)> () is parsed(/.*?/) { "" }
+ macro circumfix:{'(*', '*)'} () is parsed(/.*?/) { "" }

That's so convenient that we'll discard the special rule about
splitting symmetrically in favor of requiring a two element slice.]

[Patrick R. Michaud]

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 08:13:20PM +0200, Steven Philip Schubiger wrote:
> On 20 Apr, Luke Palmer wrote:
> : Steven Philip Schubiger writes:
> :> In
> :> macro circumfix:(*...*) () is parsed(/.*?/ { "" }
> :>
> :> is the second enclosing part of the "parsed" parentheses omitted
> :> by intention? If not, I'd volunteer to provide a patch.
> :
> : Fixed. Thanks.
> :
> : Luke
>
> You missed some.

Fixed some. Thanks!

Pm