Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
On Sep-06, Jens Rieks wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:I use them for debugging printouts, when I want to print the status of
> > So first:
> > - do we keep these opcodes?
> > If yes some permutations are missing.
> > - if no,? we should either not include experimental.ops in the default
> > opcode set or move it to dynops.
> I have not used them yet, but I think that they can be useful.
> Has anyone else except Leo and Dan used them?
something without defining a bunch of labels and contorting the control
flow. I also use them for simple non-short-circuiting ors and ands.
Nothing terribly important or irreplaceable.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.