Newsgroups: perl.perl6.internals
Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!news.glorb.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.perl.org
Return-Path: <dough...@lafayette.edu>
Mailing-List: contact perl6-internals-h...@perl.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list perl6-intern...@perl.org
Received: (qmail 12369 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2005 12:15:03 -0000
Received: from x1a.develooper.com (HELO x1.develooper.com) (216.52.237.111)
  by lists.develooper.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2005 12:15:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 7161 invoked by uid 225); 7 Apr 2005 12:15:03 -0000
Delivered-To: perl6-intern...@perl.org
Received: (qmail 7156 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2005 12:15:01 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=8.0
	tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: la.mx.develooper.com
Received-SPF: pass (x1.develooper.com: domain of dough...@lafayette.edu designates 139.147.8.40 as permitted sender)
Received: from lafayette.edu (HELO lafayette.edu) (139.147.8.40)
    by la.mx.develooper.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:14:58 -0700
Received: from maxwell.phys.lafayette.edu (account doughera [139.147.232.16] verified)
  by lafayette.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 15559546 for perl6-intern...@perl.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:09:44 -0400
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:15:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-X-Sender: dough...@maxwell.phys.lafayette.edu
To: Perl 6 Internals <perl6-intern...@perl.org>
Subject: Re: Monthly Release Schedule
In-Reply-To: <20050407022803.GV12946@perlsupport.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.62.0504070803350.23755@maxwell.phys.lafayette.edu>
References: <20050406222449.GS12946@perlsupport.com>
 <6.2.1.2.2.20050406221051.03ce88b8@pop.mindspring.com>
 <20050407022803.GV12946@perlsupport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Approved: n...@nntp.perl.org
From: dough...@lafayette.edu (Andy Dougherty)

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:

> According to MrJoltCola:
>> At 06:24 PM 4/6/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
>>>  * What platforms are required for release?  I'd guess that we'd get
>>>    almost of all of our developers (and users, for that matter) with:
>>>
>>>      darwin
>>>      linux-x86-gcc3.*
>>>      win32-ms-cl
>>
>> You should round that out with 64-bit Sparc.
>
> How many Sparc developers have we got?

I generally try to keep an eye on Solaris/SPARC to make sure it doesn't 
break, but I'm not guaranteed to have the quick turnaround time you 
envision.  It'll probably work most months, but perhaps shouldn't be 
featured as one of the "target" platforms.

-- 
     Andy Dougherty		dough...@lafayette.edu