Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion How are compound keys with a PerlHash intended to work?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Steve Fink  
View profile  
 More options Sep 15 2002, 6:48 pm
Newsgroups: perl.perl6.internals
From: st...@fink.com (Steve Fink)
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 15:18:54 -0700
Local: Sun, Sep 15 2002 6:18 pm
Subject: Re: [RFC] How are compound keys with a PerlHash intended to work?

On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 11:44:24AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> What about the rest of my proposal:

> All e.g. in perlhash unimplemented vtable functions are handled by
> default.pmc (or invalid.pmc), which should _IMHO_ through an exception
> with a meanigful text like: "class <class> tried to call illegal funtion
> <func> at <pc>".

Dan already okayed this a while back. I was supposed to be doing it,
but my tuit shipment was confiscated due to heightened airport
security. So go right ahead (please!). The conclusion of the
discussion the last time this was brought up was that you don't even
need to keep the unused default implementations around; we can
resurrect them from CVS if we ever need them.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.