From: l...@toetsch.at (Leopold Toetsch)
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 10:23:48 +0200
Local: Sun, Apr 24 2005 4:23 am
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [perl6.internals] Re: [PROPOSAL] calling convention abstraction]
[ CC'ed to list again ]
Roger Hale wrote:Sorry about that.
> I find myself on the horns of a variant of Warnock's dilemma here:
> Having done my best to clarify why I think the return context cannotThe subject of the thread was "calling convention abstraction". My
> helpfully be attached to either @IN_ARGS nor @OUT_ARGS, the thread has
> no further response from you.
proposal was about one possible way to go, and I'd like to thank you for
the input. But there is much more then the one discussed issue.
I'd like to have HLL folks create a workable scheme for abstract and
The current scheme is too limit and worse, as defined in terms of PASM,
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.