Newsgroups: perl.perl6.internals
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.perl.org
Return-Path: <d...@sidhe.org>
Mailing-List: contact perl6-internals-h...@perl.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list perl6-intern...@perl.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: dan@localhost (Unverified)
Message-ID: <a05111b03b9a8e07218dc@[129.132.7.178]>
In-Reply-To: <3D81C11C.5040104@toetsch.at>
References: <3D819911.9090605@toetsch.at> <a05111b02b9a75ad94588@[129.132.7.178]> <3D81C11C.5040104@toetsch.at>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:51:17 +0200
To: Leopold Toetsch <l...@toetsch.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC] How are compound keys with a PerlHash intended to work?
Cc: P6I <perl6-intern...@perl.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-SMTPD: qpsmtpd/0.11-dev, http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/
Approved: n...@nntp.perl.org
From: d...@sidhe.org (Dan Sugalski)
Lines: 17

At 12:42 PM +0200 9/13/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>_But_:
>
>What about all these bogus additional vtable methods of e.g. 
>PerlHash, that are currently implemented, or have dummy function 
>bodies?

Toss them. I have one more overhaul for vtables, and we may well go 
entirely multimethod for them soon.
-- 
                                         Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
d...@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                       teddy bears get drunk