Message from discussion
Namespaces in IMCC
Newsgroups: perl.perl6.internals
Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.perl.org
Return-Path: <l...@toetsch.at>
Mailing-List: contact perl6-internals-h...@perl.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list perl6-intern...@perl.org
Received: (qmail 29724 invoked by uid 76); 10 Mar 2004 18:12:38 -0000
Received: from x1.develooper.com (HELO x1.develooper.com) (63.251.223.170)
by onion.perl.org (qpsmtpd/0.27-dev) with SMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:12:38 -0800
Received: (qmail 29249 invoked by uid 225); 10 Mar 2004 18:12:34 -0000
Delivered-To: perl6-intern...@perl.org
Received: (qmail 29116 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2004 18:12:12 -0000
Received: from [195.170.70.48] (HELO mail.nextra.at) (195.170.70.48)
by la.mx.develooper.com (qpsmtpd/0.27-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:12:12 -0800
Received: from lux.leo.home (at24a01-dial-166.nextranet.at [195.170.73.166])
by mail.nextra.at (20030919/20030919/nextra) with ESMTP id i2AIC8Sa018170;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:12:09 +0100 (MET)
Received: from thu8.leo.home (thu8.leo.home [192.168.1.5])
by lux.leo.home (Postfix on linux 2.0.36 (i386)) with ESMTP
id 1AAFA118024; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:11:25 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from lt@localhost)
by thu8.leo.home (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) id i2AHwtD07887;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:58:55 +0100
Message-ID: <200403101758.i2AHwtD07887@thu8.leo.home>
To: d...@sidhe.org (Dan Sugalski)
Subject: Re: Namespaces in IMCC
In-Reply-To: <a06010203bc74de115974@[10.0.1.2]>
References: <a06010201bc73817cf36b@[10.0.1.2]> <200403092000.i29K0oU06790@thu8.leo.home> <a06010203bc74de115974@[10.0.1.2]>
Reply-To: l...@toetsch.at
Cc: perl6-intern...@perl.org
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:58:55 +0100
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on x1.develooper.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.63
Approved: n...@nntp.perl.org
From: l...@toetsch.at (Leopold Toetsch)
Dan Sugalski <d...@sidhe.org> wrote:
> At 9:00 PM +0100 3/9/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>While I see that's necessary it's not that simple ...
> Oh, sure it is. :)
> Well, from what I've seen so far, you're slamming all subs into the
> base namespace, so that if I have IMCC code that does:
> .pcc_sub foo
> .end
> there's a foo entry in the base namespace. Which is fine. What I want
> the .namespace (or whatever) thing to do is alter the default
> namespace that's used.
Silly me. Of course.
Should be ratber simple to implement. Tomorrow.
leo