Steve Fink <st...@fink.com> wrote:Not yet. We basically have two kinds of dynamically compiled code:
> ... Leo's @ANON implementation of
> your scheme works great for me (I have no problem wrapping that around
> my code.) All this does raise the question of garbage collection for
> packfile objects; is there any?
1) loaded modules - persistent code used until end of program
But the current implementation doesn't know about that difference. The
We finally need a packfile PMC that is the owner of packfile segments.
But it would still be useful to differentiate between 1) and 2). For 1)
For 2) a distinct constant table is needed.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.